|
07-21-2014, 09:53 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 595
Likes: 191
Liked 230 Times in 56 Posts
|
I want big wheelies
My car is running about as fast as I'd expect now, but it only gets a few inches of air under the tires and that's just not gonna cut it for me so let's hear some ideas, eh?
60 foots are 1.50-1.53. 327/275, Advanced clutch, 5.38 gear, Jerico w/ 3.19 low. Car weighs 2915 with driver, no ballast, on a 2910 minimum for E. Calvert split monos, 1 step lower than stock. Rancho RS9000 rear shocks set full stiff, Calvert front shocks. Old 6 cylinder springs with I think 1/2 coil cut off. Del-A-Lum bushings in control arms. Eddie Rezac linkage kit for zero bumpsteer. |
07-21-2014, 10:17 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,904
Likes: 984
Liked 1,016 Times in 264 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
How do your incrementals compare with a fast small block E/S car?
The 60' is about where I was running with a mediocre F/S 69 Camaro 255/350. You can soften the compression damping those rear shocks some. You can loosen the extension on the front shocks some.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
07-21-2014, 11:02 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 553
Likes: 267
Liked 225 Times in 76 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Launch RPM?
|
07-21-2014, 11:14 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 595
Likes: 191
Liked 230 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Alan, I'm not sure how the incrementals compare - I'll do some research at Topeka this weekend. I kind of posted this tongue-in-cheek, but I'm curious nevertheless. The front shocks are not adjustable, and the rears only on extension.
Maurice - I've left at 5800 and 6200 with no noticeable difference in 60'. |
07-22-2014, 12:16 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
Posts: 113
Likes: 28
Liked 21 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Me too...
__________________
Jeff Dudgeon '66 Coronet #10771 - bracket puke "the Flying Brick" |
07-22-2014, 07:12 AM | #6 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 1,620
Liked 9,397 Times in 1,944 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Have 52% or more on the back wheels.
|
07-22-2014, 07:24 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 311
Likes: 2
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Use an "old school" clutch setup in it, with a 40 or 50# wheel.....it wont be the quickest but it will yank the front end the highest
|
07-22-2014, 09:39 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 595
Likes: 191
Liked 230 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Found this photo from last July's national open at MAM...
Looks better but was 3 tenths slower in the 1/8 at that time...changes since that day: More power, fresh clutch, Calvert split monos, and replaced the Moroso springs (that I cut too far) with the original worn out 6 cylinder springs in front. Oh, and new M/T 3056STs last September. |
07-22-2014, 10:14 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 86
Liked 62 Times in 17 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Big wheelstands are only possible with gapless rings.
|
07-22-2014, 10:57 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 396
Likes: 102
Liked 105 Times in 32 Posts
|
Re: I want big wheelies
Do you have a data logger on that car? Being able to dial in that first hit with an adjustable clutch is crucial for getting up on the tires. Some ballast in the rear would help too..
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|