HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2015, 02:17 PM   #21
cudadoug
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

Great idea ATI as quite a few class racers have mentioned to me that the current contingency program is a joke, at best.


That said, (and not rain on anyone's parade) I'm sure the suits in Glendora are discussing the next "fee" to circumvent this...oops I mean to "enhance the manufacture's experience".
cudadoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 03:24 PM   #22
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,273
Likes: 1,631
Liked 9,426 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

ATI has very good products with great response in customer service!
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 03:36 PM   #23
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
ATI has very good products with great response in customer service!
Wish I had the money I wasted on testing other converters back. Keep putting that same ATI back in. Won't waste anymore money there. Charley knows.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 06:55 PM   #24
Dale Rethke
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 4
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

Remember Getting those awesome manufacturer t shirts off the trailers years ago really cheap! Now their is nothing like that as they are prohibited from that when I asked a few years back.
Sad
Dale Rethke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 07:20 PM   #25
Rob Petrie E395
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 162
Liked 219 Times in 79 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

I'm wondering how long it will be before they pass a new rule. That you cant have a companies contingency decal on a car at a NHRA event. Unless the company is part of the NHRA contingency program.
Rob Petrie E395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 10:15 AM   #26
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1,064
Liked 1,212 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Petrie E395 View Post
I'm wondering how long it will be before they pass a new rule. That you cant have a companies contingency decal on a car at a NHRA event. Unless the company is part of the NHRA contingency program.
You are probably right. The Marketing Morons in California are overpaid and under qualified to support us. It is too bad, because we want NHRA to succeed and many Manufacturers want to participate. They have not changed with the times. They cannot continue to reduce the value and increase the cost. The draconian measures that they will take to protect their litterbox is a little bit like the crooked politicians in Chicago and Cook county behave. In cook county, businesses were leaving because they could no longer afford the shakedown in taxes and fees. So Cook county is trying to pose exit fees. The upper Management in NHRA seems to have the same twisted approach to attacking the problems they face.

I only hope that Someone in NHRA wakes up before it is too late. They are really missing an opportunity on both ends here.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK

Last edited by james schaechter; 01-31-2015 at 10:26 AM.
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 01:16 PM   #27
jmcarter
VIP Member
 
jmcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 1,970
Liked 2,678 Times in 850 Posts
Default Re: ATI to self-administer NHRA contingency

Quote:
Originally Posted by james schaechter View Post
You are probably right. The Marketing Morons in California are overpaid and under qualified to support us. It is too bad, because we want NHRA to succeed and many Manufacturers want to participate. They have not changed with the times. They cannot continue to reduce the value and increase the cost. The draconian measures that they will take to protect their litterbox is a little bit like the crooked politicians in Chicago and Cook county behave. In cook county, businesses were leaving because they could no longer afford the shakedown in taxes and fees. So Cook county is trying to pose exit fees. The upper Management in NHRA seems to have the same twisted approach to attacking the problems they face.

I only hope that Someone in NHRA wakes up before it is too late. They are really missing an opportunity on both ends here.
There was a very interesting article on their 2013 tax return...interesting how a 501 organization can pay the people we interface with squat and Compton makes $850K a year.
__________________
Jim Carter
2340 Super Stock
2340 SST/2340 Stock
jmcarter is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.