HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2018, 09:26 PM   #161
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm View Post
We just got a 2018 Ecoboost 6 speed in today at work. K/S?
The classification guide does not list the 2018 Ecoboost Mustang, so if you wanted to run it, I think you'd have to back-date it and run it as a 2015 model. I know the nose is different, but I don't know what else is different.

If you're able to run it, it would be a natural J/S car at 12.78 pounds per factored horsepower. You could add or subtract weight to run one class up or down (K/S or I/S).

If the one you have is a Performance Package car, they have larger/heavier front brakes than the non Performance Package car.

Have you driven it?

Last edited by 6130; 06-26-2018 at 10:51 PM.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 02:28 PM   #162
Troy Henderson
Member
 
Troy Henderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 397
Likes: 104
Liked 106 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

I want to see Ecoboost Mustangs heads-up racing Ecotec Camaros. Stick only and we could call it Jr Factory Stock. It would sound like a swarm of mad bumblebees
__________________
Troy Henderson
Henderson Race Shop LLC 816-520-5389
www.hendersonraceshop.com
Troy Henderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 03:13 PM   #163
Bobby Lundholm
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 421
Likes: 94
Liked 85 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
The classification guide does not list the 2018 Ecoboost Mustang, so if you wanted to run it, I think you'd have to back-date it and run it as a 2015 model. I know the nose is different, but I don't know what else is different.

If you're able to run it, it would be a natural J/S car at 12.78 pounds per factored horsepower. You could add or subtract weight to run one class up or down (K/S or I/S).

If the one you have is a Performance Package car, they have larger/heavier front brakes than the non Performance Package car.

Have you driven it?
I didn't drive that one. I did drive a 2018 GT350 a couple of weeks ago. Pretty quick and I like the sport mode for the exhaust.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA
Bobby Lundholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 04:13 PM   #164
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm View Post
I didn't drive that one. I did drive a 2018 GT350 a couple of weeks ago. Pretty quick and I like the sport mode for the exhaust.
I don't think the GT350 (or it's flat-plane engine) is listed in the NHRA Stock Classification Guides, and it's only available as a stick-shift.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 04:41 PM   #165
Bobby Lundholm
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 421
Likes: 94
Liked 85 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
I don't think the GT350 (or it's flat-plane engine) is listed in the NHRA Stock Classification Guides, and it's only available as a stick-shift.
I didn't think it was either. I think the ecoboost Mustang would be a fun ride. Stickered at $35,000 isn't that bad either.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA
Bobby Lundholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2018, 06:43 PM   #166
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm View Post
I didn't think it was either. I think the ecoboost Mustang would be a fun ride. Stickered at $35,000 isn't that bad either.
Stickered at $25,000 is even better.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 11:35 AM   #167
Bobby Lundholm
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 421
Likes: 94
Liked 85 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
Stickered at $25,000 is even better.
Very true. I think this is the top of the line package. Orange Fury is the color.
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA
Bobby Lundholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 01:10 PM   #168
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm View Post
Very true. I think this is the top of the line package. Orange Fury is the color.
The base Ecoboost Mustang starts at $25,845.

The "Premium" Ecoboost Mustang starts at $30,860.

The Orange Fury paint (which I like) is a $495 option.

And the "Performance Package", which adds 19" wheels, stiffer suspension, 3.55 Torsen diff, bigger brakes, and a few other odds and ends, is a $2,495 option. This option would make it more fun as a street car, but the extra weight would not be helpful for a drag car. I'd pass on the "Performance Package" and put that $2,495 into things that make it go faster.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2018, 02:21 PM   #169
Bobby Lundholm
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlevoix, MI
Posts: 421
Likes: 94
Liked 85 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
The base Ecoboost Mustang starts at $25,845.

The "Premium" Ecoboost Mustang starts at $30,860.

The Orange Fury paint (which I like) is a $495 option.

And the "Performance Package", which adds 19" wheels, stiffer suspension, 3.55 Torsen diff, bigger brakes, and a few other odds and ends, is a $2,495 option. This option would make it more fun as a street car, but the extra weight would not be helpful for a drag car. I'd pass on the "Performance Package" and put that $2,495 into things that make it go faster.
I agree totally. If I were to get one I would special order it and get all the extras deleted off. No need to pay for something you are going to take right off. Order the stiffer rear gear right from Ford and take advantage of some of their performance stuff.

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-4209-88409A

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-4130-MA
__________________
Bobby Lundholm 3516 G/SA
Bobby Lundholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2018, 12:27 PM   #170
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Mustang Ecoboost K/SA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Lundholm View Post
I agree totally. If I were to get one I would special order it and get all the extras deleted off. No need to pay for something you are going to take right off. Order the stiffer rear gear right from Ford and take advantage of some of their performance stuff.

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-4209-88409A

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-4130-MA
I don't think you'll need the rear axles for a Stock Eliminator type car.

And I'd run the numbers before purchasing the 4.09 ring & pinion- the power peak on the Ecoboost engine is only at 5,500 rpm. First gear is so deep, that you'd have a pretty steep launch ratio even with the stock gearing. And turbo engines tend to be more tolerant of taller gearing anyway.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.