|
12-16-2013, 12:43 AM | #31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
See post number 26...
__________________
Rich Taylor I/SA - 321 |
12-16-2013, 06:36 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
once upon a time Strange made a 9" 3rd member that used 12 bolt gears....would THAT be legal in a 9" ford/mopar/chevy not-quite-a-stocker?
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
12-16-2013, 04:41 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
I think the point of this whole discussion is the factory cars are allowed to use rear ends, springs, and overall designs that are nowhere near the OEM configuration. In the old days it would have been classified as a modified production car. I just read the aftermarket has has available OEM type rear ends that are capable of withstanding 1,000+ horsepower for the Challengers. The factory cars should be running OEM design rear ends like the rest of us. Then there is the argument the Corvettes were allowed to eliminate the IRS yes but, they had to run a GM rear end. Also, in those days, the aftermarket wasn't making durable IRS components to take the punishment because of low demand, but it is a different story today.
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 Last edited by njk53; 12-16-2013 at 04:45 PM. |
|
|