|
07-25-2015, 07:10 AM | #1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1,146
Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts
|
Footbrake quicker than transbrake
The maverick has better ETs on footbrake than transbrake even though transbrake pops a better wheelie. The ladder bars are in middle hole should they be somewhere else?
|
07-25-2015, 07:43 AM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 996
Liked 1,043 Times in 274 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
Over the years I worked in a transmission shop in Nashville, I worked mainly on racing transmissions, and in around 90% of the Super Stock cars, a foot brake transmission was always measurably quicker, consistently. We even built identical transmissions, except for the valvebody, and in nearly every case, the foot brake setup went quicker, regardless of how the chassis was adjusted, even in 4 link cars. We also tried changing rear end gears and low gears in the transmissions, as well as torque converters. In many cases, I think it may be that the engine is happier with the RPM held well below the flash speed, so that the converter flashes hard/higher and does a better job of multiplying torque. Also, a torque converter really needs to be built for the way you intend to use it, either with a transbrake, or foot braking.
I think the modified cars, and maybe some others with high RPM small displacement engines that need a very high stall speed may be quicker with a transbrake, if the car can be adjusted for it, simply due to how hard it is to make the converter work well. I know they are easier to drive well with a transbrake.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
07-25-2015, 08:46 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 495
Likes: 256
Liked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
Bobby I agree with Alan. (yes I know Alan, it is hard to believe). On a side note tho, I will say that I believe you have to take every variable into consideration. Like my car with the Cleveland, it likes to leave off the two-step (haven't tried a transbrake yet).
__________________
Duane Eiskant 1354 Stock/Super Stock |
07-27-2015, 12:51 PM | #4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
I have never drove a transbrake car, but does the t.b. preload the car's suspension like foot braking does ?
Or is the suspension relaxed while on the brake ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
07-27-2015, 12:58 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
|
07-27-2015, 03:45 PM | #6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
OK.
I can see where the footbrake might be quicker (e.t. wise) than the t.b. then.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
07-27-2015, 04:46 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
Depends on the combo. Mine is faster off the trans brake. About a tenth.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
07-27-2015, 06:04 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 521
Likes: 246
Liked 550 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
My car has always been faster footbraking from an idle than transbrake off the two step (~3,000 rpm). But mine is a carburated combo. I've always chalked the difference up to all the nasty raw fuel flowing through the manifold, ports and cyls while the throttle was wide open and the car was at only 3,000 rpm coughing and barking on the two step. then when you let the button go there is a period of time where its very rich until all that mess cleans up. Now that I have a logger, sure enough the O2 graphs show this exact thing to be the case.
I suspect the guys with fuel injection don't have the same problem, since when you are on the two step, the program is also limiting fuel as well???? |
07-28-2015, 09:57 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
I have never drove a transbrake car, but does the t.b. preload the car's suspension like foot braking does ?
Or is the suspension relaxed while on the brake ? During heat of summer leaving off of the t-brake and a relaxed suspension the converter flash stall will often cause my small tires to spin causing a couple hundredths variance in the 60'. But when the track is below 115 degrees it will dead hook and feels like it's going to break the windshield due to the torque. It is only 2 or 3 hundredths quicker in the heat. I wish I was better at footbreaking because the car leaves so much better. With a preload on the suspension the leaves level and real smooth. where as the brake it lifts the driver side wheel about a foot off ground and is all twisted. Like I mentioned in the heat ET's are real close but in cool weather there is about a tenth difference. Just wish I was a better footbreaker, it agrees with my car much better. BTW, this is a 3400lb wagon converted from stock which runs in the low elevens and still using 9" slicks, causing my traction issues in the heat. |
07-28-2015, 03:46 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake
So it makes sense that a lower rpm launch in a footbrake car could make RT's quicker? Sometimes I increase RPM's and the RT gets worse. I never know if it's me or the car.
Kinda off topic, but what do trans temps do to RT's? |
|
|