HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2015, 07:10 AM   #1
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1,146
Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts
Default Footbrake quicker than transbrake

The maverick has better ETs on footbrake than transbrake even though transbrake pops a better wheelie. The ladder bars are in middle hole should they be somewhere else?
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 07:43 AM   #2
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 996
Liked 1,043 Times in 274 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

Over the years I worked in a transmission shop in Nashville, I worked mainly on racing transmissions, and in around 90% of the Super Stock cars, a foot brake transmission was always measurably quicker, consistently. We even built identical transmissions, except for the valvebody, and in nearly every case, the foot brake setup went quicker, regardless of how the chassis was adjusted, even in 4 link cars. We also tried changing rear end gears and low gears in the transmissions, as well as torque converters. In many cases, I think it may be that the engine is happier with the RPM held well below the flash speed, so that the converter flashes hard/higher and does a better job of multiplying torque. Also, a torque converter really needs to be built for the way you intend to use it, either with a transbrake, or foot braking.


I think the modified cars, and maybe some others with high RPM small displacement engines that need a very high stall speed may be quicker with a transbrake, if the car can be adjusted for it, simply due to how hard it is to make the converter work well. I know they are easier to drive well with a transbrake.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 08:46 AM   #3
Duane Eiskant II
Member
 
Duane Eiskant II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 495
Likes: 256
Liked 53 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

Bobby I agree with Alan. (yes I know Alan, it is hard to believe). On a side note tho, I will say that I believe you have to take every variable into consideration. Like my car with the Cleveland, it likes to leave off the two-step (haven't tried a transbrake yet).
__________________
Duane Eiskant
1354 Stock/Super Stock
Duane Eiskant II is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 12:51 PM   #4
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

I have never drove a transbrake car, but does the t.b. preload the car's suspension like foot braking does ?

Or is the suspension relaxed while on the brake ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 12:58 PM   #5
bigfoot584
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
I have never drove a transbrake car, but does the t.b. preload the car's suspension like foot braking does ?

Or is the suspension relaxed while on the brake ?
It's relaxed.
No power to the output shaft in trans until botton is released.
bigfoot584 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 03:45 PM   #6
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

OK.
I can see where the footbrake might be quicker (e.t. wise) than the t.b. then.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 04:46 PM   #7
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

Depends on the combo. Mine is faster off the trans brake. About a tenth.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 06:04 PM   #8
Kevin Panzino
Senior Member
 
Kevin Panzino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 521
Likes: 246
Liked 550 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

My car has always been faster footbraking from an idle than transbrake off the two step (~3,000 rpm). But mine is a carburated combo. I've always chalked the difference up to all the nasty raw fuel flowing through the manifold, ports and cyls while the throttle was wide open and the car was at only 3,000 rpm coughing and barking on the two step. then when you let the button go there is a period of time where its very rich until all that mess cleans up. Now that I have a logger, sure enough the O2 graphs show this exact thing to be the case.

I suspect the guys with fuel injection don't have the same problem, since when you are on the two step, the program is also limiting fuel as well????
Kevin Panzino is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 09:57 AM   #9
Bimbo Jones
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

I have never drove a transbrake car, but does the t.b. preload the car's suspension like foot braking does ?

Or is the suspension relaxed while on the brake ?

During heat of summer leaving off of the t-brake and a relaxed suspension the converter flash stall will often cause my small tires to spin causing a couple hundredths variance in the 60'. But when the track is below 115 degrees it will dead hook and feels like it's going to break the windshield due to the torque. It is only 2 or 3 hundredths quicker in the heat. I wish I was better at footbreaking because the car leaves so much better. With a preload on the suspension the leaves level and real smooth. where as the brake it lifts the driver side wheel about a foot off ground and is all twisted. Like I mentioned in the heat ET's are real close but in cool weather there is about a tenth difference. Just wish I was a better footbreaker, it agrees with my car much better. BTW, this is a 3400lb wagon converted from stock which runs in the low elevens and still using 9" slicks, causing my traction issues in the heat.
Bimbo Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 03:46 PM   #10
Ron Gusack
Member
 
Ron Gusack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Footbrake quicker than transbrake

So it makes sense that a lower rpm launch in a footbrake car could make RT's quicker? Sometimes I increase RPM's and the RT gets worse. I never know if it's me or the car.

Kinda off topic, but what do trans temps do to RT's?
Ron Gusack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.