HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2014, 06:04 PM   #11
tommy d
Senior Member
 
tommy d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 791
Likes: 1,373
Liked 310 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

Hey guys, I only started this post and posted the pics in jest. Every time I stopped by to talk to them all could see were ankles! Just giving them a little credit for thrashing on that Pinto.
__________________
Who owns this car, with the peace sign,mag wheels, and four on the floor?
tommy d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:19 PM   #12
GarysZ24
VIP Member
 
GarysZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 719
Liked 197 Times in 78 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GarysZ24 Send a message via Yahoo to GarysZ24
Smile Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Wahl View Post
Gary! Where have you been!!!? We have missed beating you up (verbally) here on the forum! Welcome back my friend! Jim


.
Hi Jim, I'm glad you (and whoever else you felt were "verbally" beating up on me), truly did miss me...lol. Since I didn't do any stocker racing in 2013 (and for that matter since May 2012), it was to depressing for me to be here w/o being on the racing scene like you and others have been. However, as you know I got my jabs in on you guys too, so the give and take was rather nice, and I'm glad to be back.

However, I actually was here two months ago when a thread here was talking about Toyota being the "Official Car of the NHRA", and I had plenty to say about that! There's even a thread in the "Lounge" section where I had some comments for "Eddie's 66", with regards to import branded vehicles.

I had a dog in this fight though, because my Cavalier is definitely a lower class stocker. I must admit I haven't had to spend nearly as much on my stocker as many who race rwd stockers have had to, and I'm glad. Even with NHRA dropping the indexes .3 back around 2010 (?), and the altitude correction factors being changed from the way they were for Stock and Super Stock, to the super categories factor (I hope if you're on the board, that you and others will seek out bringing the old indexes and our correction factors back, Jim?), my car still is competitive enough that I had a nice showing here at the Phoenix LODRS race 2mths ago. It's nice to mainly gas up and go (with the most thrashing I need to do on the car being it's occasional oil change). However, if I had Billy Nees's (or Woodro Josey's) smarts, and more dough, not only would I be doing more racing, but I'd be able to wring more hp out of my little V6 (Having the smarts of those well versed Like Woody in tuning an "Accel Calmap", would be a great start). Being able to find a flange kit for a 173 V6 (like the ones made for the S-10/S-15 trucks), and making my own headers for my car would be a big help as well. Having a house so I could tinker with my car would be the best help of the three though, and that's a work in progress!

Thanks for the thoughts though bud, and have fun at your racing events Jim!
__________________
Gary Hampton
'86 Z24,173 V6
CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021)
GarysZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:36 PM   #13
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,581
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy d View Post
Hey guys, I only started this post and posted the pics in jest. Every time I stopped by to talk to them all could see were ankles! Just giving them a little credit for thrashing on that Pinto.
I know you did, tommy d ..but this is an interesting subject to some of us.

I'd say the slower Stockers. at least the one off, or oddball ones require much more thrashing than say a 305 Camaro..Those pretty much use an off the shelf converter, cam, carb, trans, and suspension..
I don't see anyone on here selling Vari-jets, Dual jets, or Holley /Weber 2bbls..
..or headers for a 2.8 Cavalier.

I suppose Billy would build you a Monojet if you really wanted one bad enough ;-)
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:55 PM   #14
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 728
Likes: 112
Liked 135 Times in 40 Posts
Red face Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

I've worked on both upper and lower class stockers and in my opinion it is harder to make hay with the slower cars.
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2014, 10:11 PM   #15
impstocker
Member
 
impstocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 54 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

This is for GTX John- you mention tearing up more psrts on your wagon because i can assume it is heavier- I am building a 65 Impala, racing weight will be between 3900-4100 lbs, like the 68 Impala I ran in I/S I never broke any parts, really! I ran a Jerico stick too- I will be running a Turbo 350 in my 65 with the same 396/325HP combo- can I expect breakage because of the tranny? Just wondering-

Will Lamprecht- 65 Impala in progress Div 1 -I/SA
impstocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2014, 10:41 PM   #16
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 2,222
Liked 1,805 Times in 572 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

I am afraid probably so...........
Particularly if it is fairly fast ( 1.498 to 1.54 60's )

Jon 's wagon
P/SA = 3850
O/SA= 3620

Small Valve Low Po 318 = 230 HP with 380 Lift

Mark William's 35 Spline/Axles/Pro Gears

In Phoenix this year .....Broke 9 Teeth off Ring Gear
Bent 8 3/4 like a pretzel
Took an hour to get each axle out
with slide hammer with 300 Lb Guy
on the end.

Your results may vary.
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock

Last edited by GTX JOHN; 04-16-2014 at 10:53 PM.
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2014, 08:09 AM   #17
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1,400
Liked 372 Times in 80 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by impstocker View Post
This is for GTX John- you mention tearing up more psrts on your wagon because i can assume it is heavier- I am building a 65 Impala, racing weight will be between 3900-4100 lbs, like the 68 Impala I ran in I/S I never broke any parts, really! I ran a Jerico stick too- I will be running a Turbo 350 in my 65 with the same 396/325HP combo- can I expect breakage because of the tranny? Just wondering-

Will Lamprecht- 65 Impala in progress Div 1 -I/SA
At 4400 lbs, I have broken ring and pinions and a few other small things. Not the parts breaker you would think. 350-255 with turbo 350. I ran a 325-396 4-door big cay years ago and it was not bad on parts.
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2014, 08:34 AM   #18
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 907
Likes: 85
Liked 88 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Lower class Stockers require less thrashing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTX JOHN View Post
I am afraid probably so...........
Particularly if it is fairly fast ( 1.498 to 1.54 60's )

Jon 's wagon
P/SA = 3850
O/SA= 3620

Small Valve Low Po 318 = 230 HP with 380 Lift

Mark William's 35 Spline/Axles/Pro Gears

In Phoenix this year .....Broke 9 Teeth off Ring Gear
Bent 8 3/4 like a pretzel
Took an hour to get each axle out
with slide hammer with 300 Lb Guy
on the end.

Your results may vary.
John,
Next time you over achieve show us some pictures please!
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.