HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2023, 06:32 PM   #1
Brad Plourd
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 22
Liked 56 Times in 18 Posts
Default Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

Today, I could clearly see a stock eliminator driver hold something up to block his opponents side of the tree. Is this legal or not?

🤔 🤔 🤔
Brad Plourd is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-04-2023, 06:41 PM   #2
Todd Hoven
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 889
Liked 720 Times in 151 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Plourd View Post
Today, I could clearly see a stock eliminator driver hold something up to block his opponents side of the tree. Is this legal or not?

🤔 🤔 🤔
Looks like it’s legal if it’s not being corrected. Is there anything that says you can’t do this? Just windshields and helmet visors are the way the rule is written. Is this a problem if someone found another option? Or how are we as racers going to turn anyone in that attempts to find another way?
Is it about safety or racers getting the ear of the rule makers for personal agendas?

🤔🤔🤔
__________________
Todd Hoven 1035 Stock

Last edited by Todd Hoven; 02-04-2023 at 06:46 PM.
Todd Hoven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 07:12 PM   #3
Brad Plourd
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 22
Liked 56 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

That was my question Todd, and the point of this post.

Is it legal to hold a blocker?
Brad Plourd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 07:14 PM   #4
Brett C
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 260
Liked 879 Times in 197 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

I say no.
No blinders should mean NO blinders.
But what do I know!?
__________________
Brett Candies
4192 Stock/SS
God Bless America
Brett C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 07:54 PM   #5
Todd Hoven
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 889
Liked 720 Times in 151 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

This is the rule as written.

HELMET For all 10.00 and slower cars, either an open-face or a full-face Snell: M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA: 8860-2010,
8860-2015 or 8860-2018 helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. For all 9.99 and quicker cars, a full-face Snell:
M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA:
8860-2010, 8860-2015 or 8860-2018
helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. See General Regulations 10:7.


Just says about modification to the Helmet, visor and or , Windshield. Nothing about blocking or having to look at the full tree?
What is happening here is not using any of the above.
BTW I’m not a blocker, but I have no problem with someone who is long as he is safe and following the rules above.
I still think this rule has been mostly written because anti blockers have influenced a sympathetic person in power for their own benefit and agenda.
__________________
Todd Hoven 1035 Stock
Todd Hoven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 07:59 PM   #6
Brad Plourd
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 22
Liked 56 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

I actually agree with you that someone or some group lobbied for this.
Brad Plourd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 08:48 PM   #7
rboyle
Senior Member
 
rboyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 586
Likes: 1,424
Liked 554 Times in 156 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

A handheld block may fall under unsecured ballast so be sure before you do so.
rboyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2023, 09:21 PM   #8
Todd Hoven
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 889
Liked 720 Times in 151 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

Quote:
Originally Posted by rboyle View Post
A handheld block may fall under unsecured ballast so be sure before you do so.
That’s a stretch. Could be a log book.
__________________
Todd Hoven 1035 Stock
Todd Hoven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2023, 09:57 AM   #9
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 906
Liked 6,754 Times in 1,316 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

Since NHRA is so concerned with blockers and safety I will be holding a prayer card of St. Christopher in my right hand this upcoming season. As many know St. Christopher is the patron Saint of travel soooo I believe I will have all my bases covered. Never mind that it’s ALWAYS safer to have TWO hands on the steering wheel instead of ONE ….

Last edited by MR DERBY CITY; 02-05-2023 at 10:11 AM.
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2023, 10:36 AM   #10
bubski
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 14
Liked 186 Times in 63 Posts
Default Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed

This is the never ending story of TEARS !! What Bubski would like to propose is that some entrepreneur !! Come up with an SFI certified blinder like some of the other ridiculous must need in order to race items !! That way SFI and NHRA can cash in and make it a contingency item so you can get robbed of every last penny you make !! At least you'll have your blinder than !! Cheers !!
bubski is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.