|
06-14-2016, 11:57 AM | #21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
I have Classification Guides for that era. Since that was before the days of factoring and weight adjustment, the body-engine combinations could be narrowed down, if you would be interested. The 1957 Chevrolet Q/S would be a 265-162hp, not a 283. Technically, the 283-185hp engine was for automatic transmission only, though that was blurred from the beginning.
__________________
|
06-14-2016, 12:52 PM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Quote:
Very much interested. I have the Rule Books from 1958-1968 (but not 1969-71) but the only Classification Guides I have are the current ones on line. There are good to get weights, but still a big spread eg 57 Chev from lightest to heaviest. So just knowing its a 57 Chev doesn't mean much. And of course 68 Chev could mean big car, Chevelle, Camaro. For example, in the sheet Rich B already posted it lists Kost's W30 in F/SA. NHRA says 3720lb for the 442 W30 and 3720/370 puts it in G/SA in 1970. So I figure, well maybe it was a plain Cutlass at 3607lb which works for F/SA. If I didn't guess at some stuff I wouldn't get very far. I think they were factoring some stuff by 1968-1970 eg Ford's 428cj got factored right away to 360hp - different for ramair and non-ramair too. But they hadn't gone factor-crazy yet. I could sure use that Classification Guide info but not sure how to get it from you, that's a lot of info unless its in a PDF you could Email. |
|
06-14-2016, 01:34 PM | #23 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Sorry, but the Class Guides I have are red binders, no PDFs!
__________________
|
06-14-2016, 01:56 PM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Quote:
I am really just looking for HP-FACTORS, ie engines where NHRA changed the ratings. For example the 428cj was 335hp from Ford. NHRA factored it to 360hp. Then I THINK they factored the flat-hood-non-ram-air version to 340hp, I know it was different than the ram-air. I think stuff like the 302z28, Mopar 340, Ford 427, Chev 396/375 and 427s, Chev 350/255 LM1, maybe the LS6 and 455/w30 also got factored pretty quick. That's really the info I need, hard to imagine they could change all the shipping weights so I assume the online stuff today is as good as any on those. Thanks if you can list any of those factors! |
|
06-14-2016, 02:24 PM | #25 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 25
Liked 510 Times in 200 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
There was no factoring back then. Factory HP ratings stood and shipping weights as listed in the guide book. No driver weight was added. A car was weighed by itself and had to have 5 gals of gas in it. That was very specific and it cost us a record once. Pretty silly since the driver weighed 200 lbs.
The man who had the ultimate say on all of it was Farmer Dismuke. What he said was final. He could change a HP rating I believe. You have to keep in mind stock back then was not "Stock". Aftermarket pistons and rings other than stock were allowed. Cams were definitely not stock. New cars cost a lot of $$$ and the old cars were much more readily available, cheaper and proven combos. New cars were run by people with dealership connections or maybe factory support. And any new car/engine combo was a bit of a risk to see how fast it could run. For instance......the 1969 350/255 Chevy was not real popular at first until others showed how good it could run. The lower compression ratio made people hesitant to run one.The class guide book was huge....and cost some $$. People used to sit and dig thru it looking for good looking combinations. They still do! 2 books. Class guide and engine blueprint specs. All available now right here thanks to Dwight.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Last edited by Rich Biebel; 06-14-2016 at 02:29 PM. |
06-14-2016, 02:48 PM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Quote:
Here is what Rich sent if I can get attachments to work. |
|
06-14-2016, 03:04 PM | #27 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
I believe the CobraJet factoring was in super stock classes. Red Anderson once told me that the first stock factor was on the 255hp 350. The super stock classes from 1967 through early 1970s were the hotbed of factoring. When Stock was reintroduced in 1972, the SS factors were carried over to them. I know that the 396-375 Camaros carried a factor of 415 until 1981 from the efforts of Wally Booth, Bill Jenkins and others who raced them in SS.
__________________
|
06-14-2016, 07:29 PM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
06-14-2016, 09:28 PM | #29 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 185
Liked 503 Times in 126 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Quote:
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
|
06-15-2016, 09:51 AM | #30 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
|
Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71
Looking at the old class guide, the 1968-70 CobraJets were rated at 340 non-ram air, 360 ram air. The sheets have the NHRA oval logo at the bottom and the date 1970 beside the logo. The hp rating is not listed on the sheet, I had to calculate based on the shipping weight from current data.
The 1967-69 Camaros 396 375 were rated at 425. Interesting that they list a 1970 Camaro with an LS6 450hp. Any others you need info about?
__________________
Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 06-15-2016 at 09:54 AM. Reason: added data |
|
|