|
11-18-2011, 05:05 PM | #1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 63
Liked 270 Times in 68 Posts
|
What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
How about this? With Ford, Chrysler and GM all having new muscle cars how about Pro Stock being just those body styles with pretty much stock appearing bodies. For motors 358 inches with a spec blower. 10.5 tires and manual you gotta shift transmissions. How long before these cars would be as fast as the present pro stockers? The SS/A Mustangs are already close to the 7's at over 3200lbs. Make the min. weight around 2500 lbs. This should really get some interest from the manufacturers and the fans and maybe be affordable enough to attract a bunch more new teams. With identifiable bodies from the big three it should be great.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
11-18-2011, 05:46 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 1,524
Liked 334 Times in 132 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
I could become a fan again.....it's been a LONG time!
__________________
Dave Turner #1153 |
11-18-2011, 05:53 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
In today's economy how could you obsolete the investment today's Pro Stock teams have? How many of you guy's could/would step up to the plate? The only way NHRA would do this is if the factories pay for it!
|
11-18-2011, 06:03 PM | #4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
Quote:
Only thing wrong with the idea is it makes too much sense :-) peace
__________________
time is our most precious resource, you can always make more money but you can never make more time spend your time wisely with the ones you love - Ron Durham |
|
11-18-2011, 06:05 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,049
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
Who cares......Greg has a great idea. They already pizz away more money in the Pro "FUNNY" Cars than we could ever think about so what would be any different? It would save them money in the first season and more teams might jump in. Sell the junk they use now to Comp and T/S racers.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 11-18-2011 at 06:25 PM. |
11-18-2011, 06:15 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
Just might spark some real interest again ! Be a cool idea !
__________________
2894 STK |
11-18-2011, 06:53 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 281
Likes: 25
Liked 51 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
|
11-18-2011, 07:13 PM | #8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 162
Liked 220 Times in 79 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
If the economy was good like it was years ago. And Big time big money sponserships were in good supply like it was not so long ago. I could agree about changing things in a major way. But they are not we would be asking teams with millions of dollars invested in the current rules package. To sell it for pennies on the dollar to start over with a new rules package. It would be like telling stock and super stock racers to sell your current car to a bracket racers for next to nothing and buy a Cobra Jet,Drag Pack or camaro to play the game or sit home. The ones who can afford it would. The ones who cant wont. In the end every one who is racing now that cant afford it is one more team who is out of the game and I doubt there will be enough new player to take thier place. And that will mean alot less cars out there running pro stock than there is now. Jeff Burk (Of DRO) started out wanting to get rid of the hood scoops and switch them to fuel injection. Now he wants to get rid of the current rules and move the import cars up and make them the new pro stock. I could go for a change to fuel injection but to drop everything and start over with a whole new rules package is a bad idea. I think in the end it will kill the class. Just look at Greg Stanfield he just won at Pomona in a car with a huge number of passes on it for a pro stock car. Does he run that car because there is some advantage to it. Hell no he does it because he could not afford a new car and he is not the only one working with a shoestring budget. I see every time there is a rule change in your classes there are people up in arms about it. Imagine if NHRA told you that you had to buy one of the new cars to play. Thats what you are asking for pro stock if this were done to them.
|
11-18-2011, 07:19 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 281
Likes: 25
Liked 51 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
With some minor rule changes...it should have reflected the short live AA/SM
ala Bo Butner. That chapter is closed. |
11-18-2011, 08:03 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: What Pro stock could and maybe should be.
You need to get that looked at. You bumped your head along the way somewhere. Save money? Selling everything for pennies on the dollar?. Sounds like a great idea....Where does the line start?
|
|
|