|
09-11-2011, 10:03 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
GT Engine Combo
I have a 68 camaro I am considering running in super stock. I am wanting to run it in one of the slower gt classes, is there a good combination for a 350 in one of these classes because I already have a short block.
Thanks Chris |
09-11-2011, 11:05 PM | #2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 1,136
Liked 1,218 Times in 313 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
Quote:
Why not build a 295/350 and run it in a traditional class? With factory heads, it's only factored at 317HP, and runs at 9.44 pounds per HP in SS/GA. I doubt you'll find a different 350 that will run competitively in GT.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
09-12-2011, 12:36 AM | #3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 494
Liked 724 Times in 280 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
Put a 305 in it
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
09-12-2011, 12:38 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 2,747
Liked 4,805 Times in 1,828 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
1970 350 big 2bbl, small chamber heads , 250/233 GT/MA..11.75 index... Low enough for you?
__________________
Real life never quite adds up.... Jay Farrar |
09-12-2011, 05:30 AM | #5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 55
Liked 731 Times in 180 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
|
09-12-2011, 01:16 PM | #6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
I forgot about that combo Mark.... That would be a good one. Chris if you don't want to run a 2bbl then Adger is right go with a 305.
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" |
09-12-2011, 04:28 PM | #7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 494
Liked 724 Times in 280 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
I can't remember which one, but one of the fuel infected 305's was way under rated at one time.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
09-12-2011, 05:20 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 2,747
Liked 4,805 Times in 1,828 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
Dwight , I think so. The 69 is 233 also .Obviously stuck with that with a 69 body.
Somebody got the 70 hit a little, so it's out there somewhere. Adger, All the 305s are beat up pretty good for GT. Other option for GT/MA is the 283. As long as one is not afraid of rpm's, that'll work too.
__________________
Real life never quite adds up.... Jay Farrar |
09-12-2011, 06:36 PM | #9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
Quote:
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
|
09-12-2011, 08:46 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 2,747
Liked 4,805 Times in 1,828 Posts
|
Re: GT Engine Combo
Yep. 1970 2 bbl (only) is listed as 441 , but smaller chamber.
It is what it is,..like a 459 intake on a 283 ,right?
__________________
Real life never quite adds up.... Jay Farrar |
|
|