|
11-30-2010, 07:21 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,049
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: NHRA Super Stock question.....
|
11-30-2010, 09:54 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 802
Likes: 117
Liked 410 Times in 66 Posts
|
Re: NHRA Super Stock question.....
Correct me if I'm wrong (Travis) but any class that has a car that ran in the 9's, requires a physical! When I first ran GT/GA, I did not need a physical. But shortly thereafter, I did because somebody ran quicker than 10.00 with a GT/GA. So if a H, I, or J car runs in the 9's, they will need physicals too, I think.
|
11-30-2010, 10:12 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: moreno valley Ca
Posts: 264
Likes: 2
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: NHRA Super Stock question.....
I was told by NHRA tech in cali,that if your car did not run under 9.99 in any class you did not need a license (driving test)or physical.
|
11-30-2010, 10:27 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: NHRA Super Stock question.....
Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
|
|