HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2022, 05:36 PM   #11
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1,073
Liked 1,212 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Walcott View Post
Robin, I respect your input

I feel the injected cars have an advantage.

They are more efficient cylinder to to cylinder than a carburetor

I'm not a key board wiz , more of a knuckle buster at best.

I don’t think any of this matters as long as the factor is right. There are plenty of carb combos that are competitive. I think people point the finger at injected combos because some of the soft ball combos for new cars were crazy bad and of course, they would all be FI . F I alone is ok as long as the hp factor is reasonable.

There are FI combos that are good and there are some that are not so good.

The crazy part is that AHFS could work if the executive bean counters would make it worthwhile to run the cars out once in awhile.

Dan, typically posts like the one you started with have some Ideas. Let’s hear specifics. If you don’t believe in it enough to share, why did you post it?
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK

Last edited by james schaechter; 01-08-2022 at 05:39 PM.
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 05:57 PM   #12
Jeff Niceswanger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Likes: 588
Liked 839 Times in 293 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lawrence View Post
There is some truth the the Cylinder to Cylinder efficiency. While the current systems allow trimming cylinders I think that the designs of the manifolds played a big part. The OEM's in an effort to make cars more efficient really stepped up on manifold design.

I wasn't asking to be a smart ***, Since I work for a company that has some history in fuel systems I have heard many opinions. I have friends and customers who swear that their Carburetors make more power and are more consistent. On the other side I have the people who say that Open loop fueling verses Closed loop is better for their program.
If you have raced many carburetor cars over the years as well as Injected cars I would like to hear your opinion. Since I have not actually competed with a carburetor my opinion would be biased to what I know. Actually I think that with the fuel injection there are more ways to get an inconsistent run with all the variables. But again I would love to hear from those who run both.

I have tried very hard to tune or create a program that eliminates or is less effected by the various inputs in my system.

Robin
Robin, Our 993 Q-Jet motor of Gulius made 615 HP. He built us a new L-98 (240/270) in 2014 that was just like the 993 except required FI. It had the 083 OEM heads. John had no way of breaking the FI in as this was his first go round with it, so we put it on the dyno in Q Jet trim. It made 638. Shortly after we were able to get the dyno up and FI ready. To our surprise ...we lost 18 HP. That little 48 mm throttle body was just too small. I have heard many similar stories, but I know this one first hand ..
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS

Last edited by Jeff Niceswanger; 01-08-2022 at 05:59 PM.
Jeff Niceswanger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 06:56 PM   #13
my69396
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

How would combining sticks and auto's fix AHFS?
my69396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 08:13 PM   #14
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 1,714
Liked 1,732 Times in 418 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by my69396 View Post
How would combining sticks and auto's fix AHFS?
More heads-up runs.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 08:45 PM   #15
Robin Lawrence
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Galesburg IL.
Posts: 161
Likes: 212
Liked 622 Times in 108 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
More heads-up runs.
If it was in FS/G you would be losing......... hahaha

Robin
__________________
STK 308
SS 3088
Robin Lawrence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2022, 09:43 PM   #16
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 1,714
Liked 1,732 Times in 418 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lawrence View Post
If it was in FS/G you would be losing......... hahaha
Does Holley make a trailer hitch for a Gen 6 Camaro?
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 02:24 PM   #17
lstanford
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Lets put the "I" back in Stock Eliminator

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Let's put the "Common Sense" back in Stock Eliminator!
The problem with common sense is that it is not common.
lstanford is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.