HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2012, 12:14 PM   #1
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1,145
Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts
Default Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Would you rather run a 30lb radial or a 20lb bias ply? My problem is no one makes a drag radial less than 30" and I can't fit a 30" tire under my 5.0. I am either forced to use a heavier 275/60/15 street radial tire with a questionable tread width of 8.5-9.5" or use a lightweight bias ply 28x9 slick. Are radials worth as much ET as everyone says?

Does NHRA have a ruling on 275/60/15 in stock eliminator? I would really like to use the new Goodyear 4305 but different websites advertise different tread width for it. Neither the Hoosier or Goodyear trucks had any DOT radials at zmax so we couldn't measure.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 12:56 PM   #2
Eric Merryfield
Senior Member
 
Eric Merryfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 847
Likes: 1
Liked 471 Times in 114 Posts
Smile Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by SStock1373 View Post
Would you rather run a 30lb radial or a 20lb bias ply? My problem is no one makes a drag radial less than 30" and I can't fit a 30" tire under my 5.0. I am either forced to use a heavier 275/60/15 street radial tire with a questionable tread width of 8.5-9.5" or use a lightweight bias ply 28x9 slick. Are radials worth as much ET as everyone says?

Does NHRA have a ruling on 275/60/15 in stock eliminator? I would really like to use the new Goodyear 4305 but different websites advertise different tread width for it. Neither the Hoosier or Goodyear trucks had any DOT radials at zmax so we couldn't measure.
Bobby try the hoosier dot radial they are really lightweight for a DOT tire..24lbs which is close to the weight of a 30 inch drag radial..but you will have to do with the 28 inch diameter

If you can fit a 295-65-15 you will get 29.6 od, for 27 pounds..The MT et drag radials are the 38 pounders, but they are a very stout tire, were/are the choice for the super fast outlaw type cars, but they are 30 inch tires.

I think the critical question for you is are you going to running a stick? If so the radial might work or not, with a low HP pure stock style Stang.

On a non tire question......how do you block just the middle bulb?

Eric

I
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK
Eric Merryfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 01:44 PM   #3
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1,145
Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Eric, the hoosier dot radial was my other choice but it is a 10" tread width according to their website and jegs/summit sites so I don't know if its legal in stock eliminator. I am using an 8" rim so I don't know if that would bring it down to legal tread width.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012, 01:05 PM   #4
Chris Hill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 653
Likes: 8
Liked 238 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Gut says lower rolling resistance of radial will be faster than lower rotational inertia of bias ply tire.

Rotational inertia is more a factor the faster it spins and axle/tire wheel combo is very low speed relatively speaking. Axle rpm though traps will be in 1,500 rpm range for a stocker.

Figure the stick guys would chime in here. Similar to a heavy vs. light flywheel debate and I don't have a dog in that fight.
__________________
Chris Hill
https://ihmusedparts.com
Chris Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2012, 07:27 AM   #5
tj310
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Rotating weight is not the same as flywheel weight . A heavy flywheel may help launch. Heavier rotating weight ( wheels tires brakes axles ) is just extra weight to accelerate. Depending on who's formula you believe tire weight is about 3 times as important as dead weight. ---Trevor
tj310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2012, 07:41 AM   #6
Todd Geisler
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 64
Liked 345 Times in 149 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

You need to find out if a 275/60 D/R is legal for Stock or not.

If so, the Hoosier is a very good choice. For the past couple years it has been the tire of choice for X275 racers running as quick as 4.70's in the 1/8 mile with 60's in the mid teen range, so it's a proven performer. The Hoosier weighs 24 lbs each.

Mickey Thompson came out with a tire to compete with the Hoosier which it's new part number is 3754X. Not fully released right now and again, need to verify legality for the stock class. The new M/T weighs 32 lbs each.

Rumor has it Hoosier wasn't happy with M/T coming out with it's new "Pro" 275 and is planning a tire to compete with it. Should be interesting to see if and how this plays out.

If legal, put them on a 10" rim.
Todd Geisler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 10:54 AM   #7
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1,145
Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Geisler View Post
You need to find out if a 275/60 D/R is legal for Stock or not.
That is what I've been trying to find out. I can't fit anything larger than a 28" tire under the car so my only option is 275/60/15 street radial or 28x9 bias ply.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 01:26 PM   #8
Jeff Kempton
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 219
Likes: 832
Liked 47 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

From the NHRA 2012 Rulebook:

"Section 10A, page 9 Stock Cars

TIRES
Street-type or drag slick tires, maximum 9-inch tread width. Tires
may not be altered from tire manufacturer’s original design or
pattern. Size of tire (new) must not exceed 9-inch wide x 30-inch
diameter (94-inch circumference). Tires may not exceed 10 inches
wide regardless of wear. Front tires must have a full street pattern
and must measure a minimum of 4 1/2 inches on ground. Tire tread
may not extend outside fender; maximum clearance between side
wall and body is 3 inches. Slicks permitted on FWD cars. All-wheeldrive
vehicles must have treaded front tires. Recapped/retreaded
tires prohibited. See General Regulations 5:1."

Last edited by Jeff Kempton; 04-22-2012 at 01:30 PM.
Jeff Kempton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 07:59 PM   #9
partsbob67
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: rohnert park,ca
Posts: 411
Likes: 9
Liked 37 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

a lot of mustang guys running the 30" hoosier out here. why won't yours fit? mine hit on the back side, just had to trim them on the back side a little.
__________________
bob beals 7244
partsbob67 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 07:58 AM   #10
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Tires: Rotating weight vs radial construction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Kempton View Post
From the NHRA 2012 Rulebook:

"Section 10A, page 9 Stock Cars

TIRES
Street-type or drag slick tires, maximum 9-inch tread width. Tires
may not be altered from tire manufacturer’s original design or
pattern. Size of tire (new) must not exceed 9-inch wide x 30-inch
diameter (94-inch circumference). Tires may not exceed 10 inches
wide regardless of wear. Front tires must have a full street pattern
and must measure a minimum of 4 1/2 inches on ground. Tire tread
may not extend outside fender; maximum clearance between side
wall and body is 3 inches. Slicks permitted on FWD cars. All-wheeldrive
vehicles must have treaded front tires. Recapped/retreaded
tires prohibited. See General Regulations 5:1."

2 year thread revival because I am curious if anyone has tried to get a 275-60-15 tire size to pass tech in Stock ?

I am looking into running a drag radial on my T-Bird for combo races and Divisional events.

The rulebook says " Tires may not exceed 10 inches wide regardless of wear "

Is that 10" of tread pattern or 10 inches of contact patch ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.