HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2015, 07:05 PM   #11
ATI Performance Products
Sponsor
 
ATI Performance Products's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTX JOHN View Post
We have run 8 3/4 in our Volare / Aspen Stockers for many years with only
a couple of Failures in the Very Heavy Wagon at 3620 to 3850 Weight.

I would consider a looser converter 5200 (360) - 5400(318) to go with the 5:13 Gears which should be right a low elevation.

My Chassis guy said with same amount of lightning the Dana would be
40 to 50 heavier than 8 3/4. Does anyone know if he is right?
We are changing the Challenger over to a Dana right now. I need to run a 5.13 at our weight and the 8 3/4 would ratio would break in less than 10 passes. But a 4.88 would last 100 passes usually. We are 3470 lbs. And yes it sucks to break a gear with a 904 and then worry about the sprag - even with the big sprag we made for them it was 50/50 weather or not it was junked. - Also of note is that I will have 4, nice 8 3/4 pumpkins to sell! 2 Alum and 2 steel.
__________________
ATI Racing
ATI Performance Products is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 12:09 AM   #12
LNorton
Senior Member
 
LNorton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: RacerTees.com
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATI Performance Products View Post
We are changing the Challenger over to a Dana right now. I need to run a 5.13 at our weight and the 8 3/4 would ratio would break in less than 10 passes. But a 4.88 would last 100 passes usually. We are 3470 lbs. And yes it sucks to break a gear with a 904 and then worry about the sprag - even with the big sprag we made for them it was 50/50 weather or not it was junked. - Also of note is that I will have 4, nice 8 3/4 pumpkins to sell! 2 Alum and 2 steel.
^ This! Go Dana and forget about it.
__________________
Lee Norton - N229 STK
IHRA H/FIA - NHRA O/SA
RacerTees.com
LNorton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 05:34 AM   #13
SST3193
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

Any Dana experts have a suggestion, for a 1976 Ford housing, that houses 3.50:1 only? We built a 4-linked street car for a friend and would like to have a 4.10-ish range ratio. With the tall rear tires and 3.5 it sure does good on the Interstate but rarely leaves city streets.
SST3193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 07:13 AM   #14
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 2,222
Liked 1,809 Times in 572 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

I did not know their are 4 different weight Dana 60s. Does know how to tell
them apart. The ones I have used are center sections out of 80s Trucks
with Chrome Moly Tubes.
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 12:07 PM   #15
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 328
Liked 280 Times in 150 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

no expert here but from my experience there is a HD cast into the housing look for it top of rib left side of the "heaviest" Dana 60 ,otherwise the diameter of the axle tubes determines the lightness of the housing with 3 inch tubes being the heaviest---the OEM centers are really the same---supposedly there is a "501" Ford Dana 60 that is the lightest but I do not know what vehicles it came in--FED 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 01:38 PM   #16
Michael K
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 86
Liked 62 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

I've been considering replacing my 8-3/4 with the Strange 60 housing. Pricing seems good.
Michael K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 02:15 PM   #17
older racer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 2
Liked 57 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

hi, the four dana 60's are, lightest is in a 67 to 72 ford 1/2on pickup, next is mopar b and e body cars, next 3/4 ton pickups and heaviest is 1 ton pickups. I found an article in a four wheeler magazine years ago. they listed the dana's . the 1/2 ton ford one has passenger car ends on it, easy to spot. it weighs 32 # more than 8 3/4 . has 3 " tubes. also, I found a dana 60 from a J 20 jeep pickup. it has 2 3/4" tubes on it , passenger car ends as well.

Last edited by older racer; 03-23-2015 at 02:17 PM.
older racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 05:50 PM   #18
Rod Greene
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 514
Likes: 355
Liked 204 Times in 72 Posts
Default Re: Which rear end would I be better off with?

If you are building one for a race car. Do it the right way. Strange S60 center molly tubes, 40 spline ultra lite axles from MW Aluminum spool back cut ring gear. It will be bullet proof and only about 20lbs heavier than a back braced ready to run 8 3/4 that will break anyway. If you are worried about changing gear ratios at a race it is really quite simple. With the S60 you have adjusters for back lashand preload. You set your pinion gear up with bearings and shims. You can change gears in under an hour.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects.
Rod Greene is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.