HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2016, 01:01 PM   #71
junior barns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 539
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Looking at this diagram it's the way I have wired mine. But it still has a constant hot wire running to the alternator. Could you run this wire to the main switch and then to the battery ?? And if so how big of a switch (amp wise) should we use?
junior barns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 02:26 PM   #72
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by junior barns View Post
Looking at this diagram it's the way I have wired mine. But it still has a constant hot wire running to the alternator. Could you run this wire to the main switch and then to the battery ?? And if so how big of a switch (amp wise) should we use?
Only if you run it to the source side of the switch.

If you kill the main switch, you kill engine power.
You kill engine power, you kill the alt.

If I wire the alt. to the switched side of the main ( that feeds the fuse box), the engine will still run if the main disconnect is off because the alt. is still feeding 12v to the fuse box while the engine is still running.


Thus the location of the alt. wire on the source side of the main switch, not the fuse box side.


edit: Sorry Jeff if I de-railed your thread
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT

Last edited by ALMACK; 12-09-2016 at 02:37 PM.
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 03:24 PM   #73
Sean Marconette
Senior Member
 
Sean Marconette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 618
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Taylor 3601 View Post
Probably 95% of hydraulic cam stockers have solid lifters already and have had for many years,they just have .015'' travel in the pushrod seat and are considered hydraulic by the rules,it is a solid lifter with the pushrod seat cut for .015'' travel,nothing hydraulic about it and .010-.012'' of that travel is taken out when the valve is set depending on lash the lifter is compressing .003-.005'' the only difference is the lash is between the pushrod seat and lifter body rather than between the cam and lifter.
This rule doesn't change the need for ceramic,tool steel or whatever kind of special lifter is being used,it doesn't change the cam profiles they are already solid lifter profiles.
Only thing it changes is a hyd. roller that has a true hyd. roller lifter which has probably been modified to only have .015'' travel will now be able to take them out and replace with a much lighter solid roller lifter,which won't make any difference because they are already running a spring strong enough to handle the extra lifter weight,so maybe they get a few more runs out of their springs.
Nothing to get excited about.
Mike Taylor 3601
Exactly, and well said Mike!!!
__________________
Sean Marconette
84 Mustang
5060 SS/N

Last edited by Sean Marconette; 12-09-2016 at 03:30 PM.
Sean Marconette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 05:59 PM   #74
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 561
Likes: 33
Liked 47 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
Only if you run it to the source side of the switch.

If you kill the main switch, you kill engine power.
You kill engine power, you kill the alt.

If I wire the alt. to the switched side of the main ( that feeds the fuse box), the engine will still run if the main disconnect is off because the alt. is still feeding 12v to the fuse box while the engine is still running.


Thus the location of the alt. wire on the source side of the main switch, not the fuse box side.


edit: Sorry Jeff if I de-railed your thread
I might be looking at the diagram wrong but it looks like the battery is not killed by the switch, hot wire still on post along with the ground??
The alt and big red wire to sol. would have to be on the other side of main switch to completely shut off current from the bat, pourpse of main disconnect. That alt wire is still hot according to that drawing.

Last edited by Coleydog; 12-09-2016 at 06:08 PM.
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 06:40 PM   #75
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 379
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

I've been trying to figure out for years why NHRA requires the master switch to be on the positive cable. It should be on the negative cable. It would be much safer and easier. No battery ground and everything will be killed. Somebody please explain to me why I'm wrong.
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com

Last edited by Darrel Goheen; 12-09-2016 at 06:42 PM.
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 07:53 PM   #76
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 57
Liked 321 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
I've been trying to figure out for years why NHRA requires the master switch to be on the positive cable. It should be on the negative cable. It would be much safer and easier. No battery ground and everything will be killed. Somebody please explain to me why I'm wrong.
Hi
If there is an accident and the positive and negative crushed would still have a short and you have not addressed the issue of protecting both the front and rear batteries............
If wanted you could control the front battery with a constant duty rely.......
Sorry I hijacked thisthread....

Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 10:53 PM   #77
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 379
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
Hi
If there is an accident and the positive and negative crushed would still have a short and you have not addressed the issue of protecting both the front and rear batteries............
If wanted you could control the front battery with a constant duty rely.......
Sorry I hijacked thisthread....

Bob
That is correct Bob. For safety reasons I don't think a front and rear battery should be allowed. Also why is a cut off switch only required for rear mounted batteries?
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 12:55 PM   #78
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 57
Liked 321 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
That is correct Bob. For safety reasons I don't think a front and rear battery should be allowed. Also why is a cut off switch only required for rear mounted batteries?

Hi,

They should allow a maximum of 2 batteries and allow them to be located in the trunk for safety reasons, much the same that was done to allow..............

Front disc brakes......
Aluminum seats..........
Roller rocker arms....
Solid rear axles in IRS cars.......
Aftermarket rods, pistons and valve train.....
Full cages that extend through the firewall.........
I am still trying to figure out the safety advantage of an aluminum radiator...

I could go on and on about the STOCK rule changes for safety, but I will stop now..........

Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 01:28 PM   #79
junior barns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 539
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

Sorry on hijacking this thread but when did NHRA allow aluminum radiators as replacement? I have been out of racing for a while!
junior barns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 01:34 PM   #80
Tony Goodman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Zeeland, MI
Posts: 98
Likes: 128
Liked 18 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Lifter rule in Stock

The Safety people at the track would know that all door cars have their battterys in the back and controlled by the master cutoff switch.

Last edited by Tony Goodman; 12-10-2016 at 04:29 PM.
Tony Goodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.