HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2021, 10:01 PM   #21
bykr
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 232
Likes: 274
Liked 167 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Race Clean View Post
But they needed a better rod for sure to able to be in the mix at the time.
I remember talking to Aldon Miller some 20 years ago or more when he was one of the top dogs, he said when they got to 500+ hp they started becoming hard to keep inside the block.
The Lemans capscrew rods are a fine piece and are good for well over 500hp so I don't know what you guys are talking about.
__________________
Tim Schmackpfeffer 762 SS
bykr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2021, 11:04 PM   #22
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by bykr View Post
The Lemans capscrew rods are a fine piece and are good for well over 500hp so I don't know what you guys are talking about.
The LeMans cap screw connecting rods, were a good rod in its time. Connecting rod technology, materials and fastener technology has changed.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-12-2021, 10:00 AM   #23
Race Clean
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by bykr View Post
The Lemans capscrew rods are a fine piece and are good for well over 500hp so I don't know what you guys are talking about.
I don't know Ford's, only what I get told.
If they where ava. for all and approved at the time I guess there shouldn't have been a problem then!

Aftermarket Rods is the least problem in what parts NHRA has approved for Stock,in fact the best move so far imho.
__________________
Stop global whining
Race Clean is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2021, 10:21 AM   #24
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

As far the BBC crank stroke go they can vary quite a bit, lets take a 454 cast 039 crank for instances, the factory grind had a high of 4.010 and a low of 4.002, we indexed it and ground it to 4.010. We just did a steel 454 7416 that came in at a low of 3.990, it was indexed and ground to 3.990. Just because its suppose to have a 4.00 stroke and be equal on all four pins, its NOT. So it makes since any crank prepped for a stocker would be indexed and ground .013 over factory specifications.
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2021, 09:13 PM   #25
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,284
Likes: 1,638
Liked 9,461 Times in 1,960 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

We had a crank in the shop that was .011” long from the factory but the index was off a few degrees. It still made a good stroked stocker crank at .010 .010. Informed the customer we had to roll the crank to get it to index and the timing marks would be off at TDC on the damper.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-13-2021, 02:28 PM   #26
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 198
Liked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

I go with the every little bit helps theory.. 1 here 2 there 5 there all ads up into a bigger number....
the+.013 stroke is the probably least amount of gain in the crankshaft mods.. I believe the equalizing of the stroke and the indexing of the throws are the more important...
getting all the cylinders equal on stroke and same timing...having all the cylinders equal, producing same power..you could ride a bicycle with two different length cranks for the pedals and have them 120* apart, but it sure wouldn't be smooth or very efficient
when you are grinding a stocker crank you better have a stroke gauge.. crank grinders are set for stroke but it doesn't always come out exactly what it is set to .... we go +.013 and if you miss by a couple thou on the stroke wont check legal... I check stroke as I go and some times have to adjust +/- a few thou on stroke...
best I can tell around .040' on index=about 1*
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 02-14-2021, 10:30 AM   #27
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft

Every crankshaft grind starts with a straiten and then this.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	stroke checker.jpg
Views:	261
Size:	19.1 KB
ID:	56782  
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.