Ok then tell me why?????

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by Jim Wahl

Yeah, where ya been? I've missed your jersy accent! Jim

.

Jim, that's a NY accent.

[Michael Beard]

The discussion is important in order to keep the sanctioning body accountable. If the events at the track were widely known, and the sanctioning body does not make an announcement and/or act on it, then we have a much larger problem.

[HR9121]

Originally Posted by Michael Beard

The discussion is important in order to keep the sanctioning body accountable. If the events at the track were widely known, and the sanctioning body does not make an announcement and/or act on it, then we have a much larger problem.

I agree 100% Michael, but in today's society what a person can say about someone else is a fine line. I received messages wondering why I was taking up for the individual when nothing could be further from the truth. I don't even know him, I was actually trying to stop some people from saying something they might regret later.
The rules of the forum are there to protect the forum as well as the individual that might make an accusation against someone else without definitive proof. Some of the things being said could cause someone much bigger problems other than being kicked off a message board.

[Jim Wahl]

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Jim, that's a NY accent.

Oooooops! Sorry Ed. Missed ya anyway. Jim

.

[rognelson777]

Originally Posted by Michael Beard

The discussion is important in order to keep the sanctioning body accountable. If the events at the track were widely known, and the sanctioning body does not make an announcement and/or act on it, then we have a much larger problem.

I could not agree more, There seems to be a lot of hearsay about events. Any witnesses or just rumors?

[Mickey Whaley]

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Mickey, I sold all my stuff 3 years ago. Now I spend my time driving a flat bed and working on a '65 mustang and a '65 rambler american wagon. Also learning to master the fine art of accuracy with black powder muzzleloaders . 50 yds no problem,100 yds not so easy.

50 yards no problem trying to reload with a 500 pd bear coming at you, PROBLEM mustang looks nice now get ur azz back on the racetrack

[Ed Fernandez]

Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley

50 yards no problem trying to reload with a 500 pd bear coming at you, PROBLEM mustang looks nice now get ur azz back on the racetrack

Feets don't fail me now.

[Mike Meier]

If that's what you've been working on besides cars I'm glad I got out of Jersey....buncha Yankees (sorry, had to throw that in there).

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Mickey, I sold all my stuff 3 years ago. Now I spend my time driving a flat bed and working on a '65 mustang and a '65 rambler american wagon. Also learning to master the fine art of accuracy with black powder muzzleloaders . 50 yds no problem,100 yds not so easy.

[Keith 944]

Well its been a week, no reply at all from IHRA is this just going to be swept under the rug?
If, and I stress IF this was an electronics being found issue, and nothing is done other than a DQ, than I would say this was a cowardly act on IHRA's part not to hold said racer accountable and keep a fair and honest playing field for everyone. To me that type of infraction is the same intent as steeling from other competitors. either way, we should know why the DQ.

[Chuck Beach]

Not saying this is right but, tough for IHRA to suspend a guy that supports IHRA. They already have to deal with very low car counts at most events.