HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2014, 02:14 PM   #41
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

Yes, I realize the rear upper point can be raised or lowered.
Moser housings are actually cast with a taller ear there (GM anyway)

The Weibe system on the GM cars was "legal" for years..until someone from tech decided to take a close look ...Then it was no longer legal . The bars didn't change one bit.
I'd be careful about buying something that may be tech legal for street tire or 8.5 ?
classes.
We're talking about NHRA Stock here.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2014, 02:45 PM   #42
Steve Stickel
Member
 
Steve Stickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Coast, Massachusetts
Posts: 144
Likes: 141
Liked 43 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

[QUOTE=Sean Marconette;450818]None of those shown have any adjustment options from what I can see, like a 4 link, other than the UCA's?
I would recommend making sure the bolts in the LCA's have no slop with the new arms. I replaced my stock bolts, as the bolts are metric and the LCA bushing was 1/2".

Actually, if you look close there are 3 adjustment holes to choose from.. In the photo, its bolted thru the center position. Additionally, the kit comes with another set of adjustment plates in split positions so you do have the choice of 6 upper control arm positions.....

Quote "The one pictured above mine might not fly...it appears to have some extra bars requiring another attachment point."

What you're seeing is the optional diagonal locator trac bar which doesn't use any additional attach points. I ordered this with the kit in the event this is ever used in Superstock with adjustable LCA's w/ heim joints..
__________________
Steve Stickel
1161 Stk
1167 SS
Steve Stickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2014, 04:37 PM   #43
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Yeah, I kept looking at those lowers and it appeared to me a better possible angle vs all the rest. Only downside I see is they are likely heavier pieces than any other...weight in the right spot anyway.

Edit: I said Southside Machine, but these are actually UMI, a copy of the same. http://www.ebay.com/itm/360192700262?item=360192700262&viewitem=&sspagenam e=ADME:X:AAQ:MOTORS:1123&vxp=mtr Guessing those plates on the sides are for an optional sway bar mount?
I think Southside's patent expired and Lakewood and others are free to make those "Southside" style LCAs now. At least that was my understanding.
They are 100 % bolt on, but you have to drill a hole into the side of the LCA brackets that are welded on the factory rear end housing in order to place a 3/8 " bolt.

I have used original Southside brand LCAs for years on my T-Birds with the factory 87-88 Turbo Coupe sway bar.
The pic attached is my Gray Bird with Moroso drag springs in the front and Southside lowers with dual air bags.
I set the pinion down 3 deg. before I drilled that one hole I mentioned above. Then I used adjustable uppers to dial in the hook.
Unlike other cars that "squat" in the rear on launch, those bars help lift the rear and plant the tires.

__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT

Last edited by ALMACK; 10-24-2014 at 04:41 PM.
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2014, 05:54 PM   #44
Sean Marconette
Senior Member
 
Sean Marconette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 617
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Stickel View Post

Actually, if you look close there are 3 adjustment holes to choose from.. In the photo, its bolted thru the center position. Additionally, the kit comes with another set of adjustment plates in split positions so you do have the choice of 6 upper control arm positions.....
That's the ticket! The setup I have does not have all of those brackets, and has the multi-position holes.

Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette
84 Mustang
5060 SS/N
Sean Marconette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2014, 12:18 AM   #45
6031 stock
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maple Ridge B.C.
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

dont over think it to much i run stock length lowers and upper adjustable uppers both Edelbrock with right rear air bag with 1.48~`1.50 60' in K/SA
__________________
Marshall Greenwell K/SA
6031 stock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2014, 11:28 AM   #46
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6031 stock View Post
dont over think it to much i run stock length lowers and upper adjustable uppers both Edelbrock with right rear air bag with 1.48~`1.50 60' in K/SA
^^ agree

My Stocker T-Bird has run a best of 1.51 60ft with a real stock suspension. ( and that was with a short 26 " front tire)
It has run several 1.55 60 footers

* Stock 1986 upper and lower control arms ( unboxed)
* Stock 1986 quad shocks still hooked up
* Some industrial belting wound up inside the right coil spring (to help level the car on launch)
* Air shocks are the only non factory issue item on the car's rear suspension.

I have no idea what the pinion angle is.

It works, so I leave it alone.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2014, 08:18 PM   #47
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

If I were not experimenting for better results I would just box the stock arms and leave it at that...but I'm always searching for something better.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 05:24 PM   #48
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Fox and SN95 Mustang rear control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
^^ agree

My Stocker T-Bird has run a best of 1.51 60ft with a real stock suspension. ( and that was with a short 26 " front tire)
It has run several 1.55 60 footers

* Stock 1986 upper and lower control arms ( unboxed)
* Stock 1986 quad shocks still hooked up
* Some industrial belting wound up inside the right coil spring (to help level the car on launch)
* Air shocks are the only non factory issue item on the car's rear suspension.

I have no idea what the pinion angle is.

It works, so I leave it alone.
Nice #'s Alan, I have yet to come within a tenth of that. But I guess that's what shoe polish is for.

Took my OEM sway bar off this past weekend for 11 passes and found the car has quite the twist without it. Back on it will go.
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.