HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2017, 02:07 PM   #251
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,416
Likes: 2,581
Liked 4,452 Times in 1,694 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myron Piatek View Post
I could understand if they still made the LD340, but it's been out of production for a long time. Modern replacement is in their RPM/RPM Air-Gap series.
Why supercede an out of production aluminum manifold for an out of production cast iron manifold?
Are they that bored over there? I could give them plenty to do.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 02:44 PM   #252
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 57
Liked 321 Times in 101 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Why supercede an out of production aluminum manifold for an out of production cast iron manifold?
Are they that bored over there? I could give them plenty to do.


It's called justification...................
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 06:59 PM   #253
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 3,103
Liked 6,789 Times in 1,524 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

What has me concerned here is NHRA has already approved the LD4B for the 273. They pulled off a sneaky approval recently of the LD340. Using NHRA reasoning(not my reasoning), I don't see why the DP4B wouldn't be approved for the 383 and the CH4B for the 413 and 440. They are in the same parts book with the same "aftermarket" P in the part number.
Now, AFTER they have approved these intakes, why couldn't they approve a "replacement" intake just like the 396/375 deal?
Knowing what I know about the AMC Edelbrock intake, I have to say that based on what NHRA is doing with the Mopar intakes, the AMC intake should be legal. And to go one step further, when will NHRA start approving Edelbrock intakes for all makes based strictly on legal precedence?
We're fast on our way to being ET-2!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

World's greatest Under-Achiever!
Billy Nees is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 09:08 PM   #254
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,416
Likes: 2,581
Liked 4,452 Times in 1,694 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Performer RPM should be allowed then, as long as it's painted to match .
C'mon Pontiac guys, jump on board the new NHRA.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100_2850b.jpg
Views:	255
Size:	44.7 KB
ID:	38312  
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers

Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 02-17-2017 at 09:11 PM.
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 07:09 PM   #255
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
What has me concerned here is NHRA has already approved the LD4B for the 273. They pulled off a sneaky approval recently of the LD340. Using NHRA reasoning(not my reasoning), I don't see why the DP4B wouldn't be approved for the 383 and the CH4B for the 413 and 440. They are in the same parts book with the same "aftermarket" P in the part number.
Now, AFTER they have approved these intakes, why couldn't they approve a "replacement" intake just like the 396/375 deal?
Knowing what I know about the AMC Edelbrock intake, I have to say that based on what NHRA is doing with the Mopar intakes, the AMC intake should be legal. And to go one step further, when will NHRA start approving Edelbrock intakes for all makes based strictly on legal precedence?
We're fast on our way to being ET-2!
Considering the history of similar policy areas that NHRA has moved in, you are describing a very possible set of events and reasoning that will be applied.

As an example, look at this ad in CR Classifieds: http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=65307
NHRA should do whatever to keep an "entry level" class from even entertaining rules that would justify a set of $1150 valve lifters.
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 09:09 PM   #256
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 561
Likes: 33
Liked 47 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

If they did do ET2 wouldn't it save them a lot of time and money paying tech guys? Could be their new plan, piss everyone off so they quit coming, get rid of those old out of date cars (younger people don't relate to them) so the new boys (cars) can play. It's the "New NHRA". This manifold hits me dead on since I've been building a 70 Duster 340 before the rule changed. I have my engine parts and do not want to start over this late in the game.
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 12:05 PM   #257
James L Miller
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 6
Liked 24 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

I decided to submit an Ed Winfield carb as a replacement for a 170 CID Slant Six. Any complaints? [sarcasm] Just joking. Talk about a non-available part.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya!
James L Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 12:27 PM   #258
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 326 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

I have a one barrel from an inline Gray Marine (Chrysler Marine) from 54, I think it was the predecessor to the 170 Carb. It's legal. I also got a giant one barrel from a Red Diamond 450 heavy truck motor. Sorta like a bucket with a flap. Good for 1/8 mile racing, can't make 1/4 before out of gas. Just trying to help my racing buddies.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 12:31 PM   #259
davidhuff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 928
Likes: 1
Liked 120 Times in 42 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton View Post
I have a one barrel from an inline Gray Marine (Chrysler Marine) from 54, I think it was the predecessor to the 170 Carb. It's legal. I also got a giant one barrel from a Red Diamond 450 heavy truck motor. Sorta like a bucket with a flap. Good for 1/8 mile racing, can't make 1/4 before out of gas. Just trying to help my racing buddies.
Great information,have another beer!LOL
davidhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2017, 02:25 PM   #260
Todd Hoven
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 883
Liked 720 Times in 151 Posts
Default Re: Important if you run D-H/S or SA

Guess the new intake doesn't work to bad. I'm reading about the first 9 sec pass by a D/SA. Coupled with some replacement aluminum heads, that sounds like an unbeatable combo. Hats off to the guys that got it approved and put it into action.
__________________
Todd Hoven 1035 Stock

Last edited by Todd Hoven; 07-29-2017 at 05:37 PM.
Todd Hoven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.