CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   oil retention devices (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=24765)

buzzinhalfdozen 04-03-2010 08:33 AM

Re: oil retention devices
 
I'm not in favor of this on many levels, the cost, the service issues,the REAL need.First the cost, if you have room and can just get a garden variety diaper and install it great, go for it. However most of the cars I've seen would require quite a bit of reworking, if such a device had been incorporated into the build from jump street then all's well. I like Wade do most all of my own car building, build a new set of headers, yeah I can do it then I can drop another $300 for coating and throw my other perfectly good set in the scrap pile.First issue solved, next oil pan, nearly touches mid plate, well a new $700-$1000 oil pan should fix that.So for me at least, besides the labor time to fab up the headers and the cost of the diaper I'm in for about $1000 dollars. Now would I spend a grand to protect my race car, yeah you bet however as stated by some here it's still no guarantee, I'm not going to leak some fluid, for instance, A good freind of mine has a T/S car with a diaper a few years ago he's at a race leaves the line all the sudden car takes off on him, tags the wall, car goes back to RJ for repair. The culprit? He had a small water leak that kept collecting in the diaper once it had enough stored up well you can see how it turned out. As for service well seems to me it would require at the very least taking one side of it down, is that a pain, not sure but for some apps I'm quite sure it wouldn't be pleasent. And yeah the REAL need how 'bout showing us track oiling racers some data, data's good I've found it useful most every day in my life. I cannot say having one is a bad idea, however I can say it's a bad idea to make them mandatory, we simply can't run every possible scenario and come up with a fix for it, too many variables.So to the guys that have them cudos just don't make everyone else have to have them. Joe

Dinsdale 04-04-2010 11:50 AM

Re: oil retention devices
 
It should be manatory on every car with a BLOWER, otherwise optional equipment. Stuff will occasionally blow up including transmissions and rear ends. Are we going to diaper them too? I have oiled a track and sat and waited while cleanup was done for others. It's part of the deal. This idea is another knee jerk reaction to a low percentage problem and I'm against it.

Mike Crutchfield 04-04-2010 01:54 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
Stock is the oldest sportsman class with SS probably a close second and the basic rules have been in place for a very long time. To ask a class to change from those rules in an instant and start cutting and moving steering and crossmembers and frame rails, headers and what ever else some of the cars will have to do to allow for a retention devices in not productive or good for the future of NHRA Drag Racing in this economy.
I'll be the first to say we could use extra safety devises on all classes but at what price would we have to pay for this rule to be put into effect this soon. This should not be a hasty decision and much research needs to be done before any rule is considered so not to leave anyone out of racing. This is not to say if you can put one on you should go for it.

NHRA has been good enough to ask for input from Stock and Super Stock CAR OWNERS only.
They are engaging in the first part of the research nessesary to be able to discuss the issue intelligently. If you want to share your difficulties of the application of these devises on your car I urge you to do so VERY SOON by emailing Bob Lang and copy your Div. SRAC member. Please include your car numbers and type and year of car and engine combination. Pictures will be very helpful.
This is a very serious matter for some to comply with and you should be heard from.

Thanks
Mike Crutchfield
D2 S/SS SRAC Member

John Kelley 04-04-2010 03:08 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blown hemi 526 (Post 179871)
It should absolutely happen !!! Every car that goes to a national event, divisional or open should be required to have an oil containment system - end of story !!

Maybe your BLOWN 526 HEMI needs one !! But very few in Stock or Super Stock actually needs one !! Too many posts on this are from people not involved in Stock or Super Stock but come here because the forums for throttle stop classes are DEAD !

Floyd Gomez 04-04-2010 04:49 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
They were not down for Stockers Blowing up at the classic. Rain washed out saturday racing and washed out the finals on sunday. Had to run them on Monday. There were 3 oil downs total and from what I understand all 3 were caused by .90 Super cars so get you facts straight.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blown hemi 526 (Post 179871)
It should absolutely happen !!! Every car that goes to a national event, divisional or open should be required to have an oil containment system - end of story !!

People want data on how and when a stocker or super stocker has oil the track? How about the Dutch Classic 2 years ago - my buddy was racing there and said they were down for 6 ++ hours because of stockers blowing up - they then cancelled the day.

If you are wheelstanding and worried about ruining the diaper - that means you are hitting your oil pan or frame - you have bigger issues !!

And since when do we need proof of past problems - why in the world do I have to run a -15 suit. Show me the data of how many people suffer burns over their body because they had a -5 on?

The rule should simply be you race div or nationally - everyone has to have it on - you bracket race locally 10.99 and faster you need it as well.

You can buy a diaper for $149 so I dont want to hear it's bull**** and they are killing us with costs - my suit was 1800 !!!

Sorry if it sounds like a rant - but the topic is a joke and should really be a non issue


Ed Fernandez 04-04-2010 05:44 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
I was there at the Dutch and the ONLY reason the race was delayed was because of rain.
Don't remember any problems with stockers oiling down the track.
BTW do you have a diaper on your heemi?I hope so.526"s and a blower sounds like a recipe for a future China Syndrome.

art leong 04-04-2010 06:06 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez (Post 179947)
I was there at the Dutch and the ONLY reason the race was delayed was because of rain.
Don't remember any problems with stockers oiling down the track.
BTW do you have a diaper on your heemi?I hope so.526"s and a blower sounds like a recipe for a future China Syndrome.

Seems like some people have an agenda. Ed. He has to use one so he wants everyone to use one. Sounds like misery loves company.

Floyd Gomez 04-04-2010 07:12 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
Actually your facts are no where near correct. I was there with a friend looking at a stocker that was for sale. There were 3 oil downs that I witnessed and all were from .90 cars. Not once did I ever see a stocker oildown anything and I watched every stocker run.



Quote:

Originally Posted by blown hemi 526 (Post 179941)
My facts afre 100% correct. It was the stockers that oiled the track not the .90 cars. And they eventually did call it because it did shower and it was cold.
So I will give you that - they did not call itmainly because of the STOCKERS oiling the track.

Here is a question for you to ponder - IF the stockers/super stockers never had an issue then why is this even being discussed?? Thanks end of discussion. Just get ready to have your diapers next year because they will be mandatory - and a long time coming at that.

Sorry but let the wah fest begin.


buzzinhalfdozen 04-04-2010 07:35 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
Blown Hemi, I think your log on name says it all, not aware of too many of those in S/SS. The post was started in regards to what actual S/SS racers thought of this plan of action, not for people who don't have a dime in it. I've got several freinds who run the faster classes who all had to shell out the coin for the 15 suits.Then most scrambled on the rear driveshaft deal. Sure most grumbled but hey the rule was already a done deal. Those are completely different cars than we're talking about. You say we're not entitled to see some data on this subject, why not? If they told all us that we've got this much down time by these certain classes that may sway some racers to rethink. Really I'd like to see the numbers across the board, for all classes T/F on down, any guesses on who the worst offenders are? Again I'm not against someone having one on I'd just like the choice, since we seem to be losing our choices on most everything else. And for the record I had a near miss while running a car with a diaper, kicked the rods in the lights crossed just behind me and tagged the wall hard apparently the Rat motor inards over loaded the diapers capacity. Joe

Jim Bailey 04-04-2010 08:01 PM

Re: oil retention devices
 
I can not represent racers a the SRAC meetings with info like; my buddy said , my wife said, my ex-wife said, etc. It won't fly!....We need; I was there. I saw Stock # ...SS # Oil the track and cause a delay. Then, We need info as to why they oiled the track - Engine Failure - Tranny Failer? - Rear End? SRAC only needs and can deal with FACTS! As they say $h*t in $h*t out. BTW - I was at the Dutch two years ago, and the only delays I remember were due to weather. Blown up 526, you're not Graham Light by chance, are you? (laughing). JB


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.