Re: Super class survey
Quote:
i think im the only one in the U.S. that runs a 91 camaro convertible (ROADSTER) in SST you dont think i get some dirty looks |
Re: Super class survey
Rock can't turn around cause he has big hair. I can cause I'm losing mine
|
Re: Super class survey
This is great, I received no emails. So much for being a no count. I must be so bald they cant see me. My Bad they sent it to an 8 year old email adress.
|
Re: Super class survey
I vote leave it alone, They think by lowering the indexes the cars will be on the stop for shorter amount of time and therefore be in a better area of the track for traction. (lessen the amount of .90 wrecks) if you lower them give it a few years and see that it made NO difference bc everyone will still just go faster, and by making the cars faster means that the now average 175 mph S/C car would be an average 180mph car. If it happened I would rather crash ar 170 than 180 wouldn't you?
S/ST you want to FIX that class? How about "NO TUBE CARS" full body cars with full frames ONLY! Back halves allowed but must retain factory firewall and/or frame rails. And keep the Scotty rule because you wouldnt be allowing S/St guys to run other classes, you would be letting HITTERS go back into street. This would PISS OFF alot of S/ST racers when it becomes as difficult to win rounds as S/G and S/C. That is my only post / comment for this discussion (you all fight nicely amongst yourselves) |
Re: Super class survey
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Super class survey
Quote:
If you are .020 in S/ST chances you are even or treed the other guy. In S/C if you are .020 you are probably SCREWED. I just dont want to see hitters moving back to S/ST and taking advantage of a bigger window of opportunity. I have done it myself, and people didnt like it, Maple Grove Dutch Classic I ran S/ST made it down to 3 cars when the engine broke, i was getting dirty looks and felt that i was not wanted there. |
Re: Super class survey
I race both S/C and S/ST with about the same success (just enough to keep me coming back) and I think the S/C packages are the tightest, followed by S/G and S/ST. I'm a stats guy and pretty sure the run sheets will back that up.
However, some of that is equipment - dragsters are a little more consistent both in vehicle reaction time and downtrack (e.g. wind), and faster is always more consistent on an absolute basis (percentage change in ET) all else equal. My thumb-eye coordination sucks equally in both cars but my lights group a little better in the dragster. Finally, half the stats are from first round and S/ST is the first thing down the track in the morning, so consider that bias - everyone's guessing a little more then. I think there are more stripe drivers in S/C, that's good and bad - some know their stuff and some try to do stuff they just don't know how to do. More guys in S/ST set up their numbers and roll the dice, at least down here. |
Re: Super class survey
From what i'm reading is....If some of you could make your perfect class backhalf, et change or mph cap do you REALLY think your going to make it to the winners circle. Its still going to be the same winners because these people work at it and figure things out. All this adds up to more cost and more rules.
One thing ...you still need grade points for nationals and NHRA has no parking at national events so classes are limited anyway. LOL |
Re: Super class survey
Quote:
Scott fifield |
Re: Super class survey
Quote:
Hey Dan Moore, you're #1. :D RIP Mark Graham |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.