Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
ask if they will put 'em back in !!!! |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
when you have a guy with one of the fastest older cars in the country just pack up and leave before the first round of eliminations at indythat tells you something is wrong. That man probably spend at least two or three thousand dollars to go to that race and I am sure took time off of work to go do that. can anyone answer when was the last time someone with an older setup out ran a car that was 08 or newer? Equality in hp factoring will never be a reality otherwise these people would never have spent 100-125k on these cars.
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
If the existing rules were applied equally to every car and not exempt certain groups there would be no issue like this. That's the whole point you're missing. Had all the FS combos been required to face the same ahfs as everyone else then factors would most certainly be more correct than they are. At one time the LT-1 and LS-1 combos had an edge due to factors but that eventually worked itself out. This exempting certain classes and thus those combos is what is the issue. And suggesting a fundamental change like you did is never an answer.
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
My simple solution is to implement AHFS for factory stock.
Now that NHRA knows what they can run - Make the FS/A index a 9.70 and make the FS/B index a 10.0 Keep it simple add 3 tenths to the FS cars and implement AHFS starting at the next race where factory stock will be run. Also - need to run FS at more (all) races too. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Agree with this completely. The NHRA is not being consistant with what they have done in the past regarding the new factory race cars. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
I proposed an idea the other day on my Facebook page:
Let ALL new (2008-newer) cars run FSS. That way, the cars in B/SA on down can run; right now it seems to be mostly AAA-AA-BB-CC cars. Run them handicapped, off the Class Index like Comp and the Combo Class runoffs, and AHFS can then apply since they are in their natural class, eight, etc; not an artificial Class/Index/weight. We had sixty-seven new cars at Indy; only thirty I think ran FSS. Under my proposed rule, ALL new cars would be in and make for a bigger show for NHRA and the OEM's. Just a thought. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
;););) According to the 2014 NHRA RULE BOOK - All cars in Stock classes must be factory-production assembled , showroom available, and in the hands of the general public. A minimum of 500 units of a particular style must be produced.
How many of the factory cars (copo's drag-packs, cobra jets) are built each year??? How many of them are available to the general public through the dealer showrooms?? I think many of the questions can be answered by examining these criteria. Evidently NHRA doesn't follow their own rulebook. Don't get me wrong, I love the new cars (built after 2008), they just need to be put where they belong and factored properly. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Having the late model cars participating has to be good for the sport, the way it was done leaves a lot to be desired. Jim Mantle V/SA 6632 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.