Re: Bring back super/mod...
Also, on the crank, could limit it to 2 inch rod journal, with a max, .060 undersize. And ring widths, say 1\16, 1\16 3\16. But all of this would require tear down, and that's what I want to avoid. Just some thoughts.
|
Re: Bring back super/mod...
I think a weight break for older model cars is way over due. I love clutch cars, but I'm trying to get interest. I think getting brodix, and say, Drag Illustrated pushing this would help.
|
Re: Bring back super/mod...
Quote:
What kind of hybrid are we seeking here? Stocker type suspensions with "spec type" engines? Super Stock style suspension with same? Converted bracket cars, that really opens a can of worms. Just a thought, come up with a basic set of "rules" as a guide. Make it a Class Racer stickey? Then we can bench race and tweak them? |
Re: Bring back super/mod...
That ain't gonna fly, that ain't gonna fly
No it didn't work then, and it dont work now But do or die, I'm gonna try To enjoy the ride, all the way down http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscart.../tmcn1451l.jpg |
Re: Bring back super/mod...
Mike,
You are spot on! I've read every post. Bad back, bad knees and everything else. I'd love to go back to a stick. If someone can pull this off - I will travel . I think the fans would love it as much as us racers. Doyle Quote:
|
Re: Bring back super/mod...
It'll never happen. Makes too much sense, and entirely too entertaining, and fun.
|
Re: Bring back super/mod...
I would like to hear what Mike Keener
thought about this thread. He was one of the best when it came to modified racing. Hammer |
Re: Bring back super/mod...
So, what are we talking here.
Are these cars going to required to have full roll cages? 9.0-9.50 lbs - cubic in, max 366 750 cfm carb - whats the FI equivalent? It's a new world, the younger FI guys need to be included? 10.5 tire stock or "stock type" suspension, minor inboard movement of the rear suspension for tire clearence, no FWD conversions $500 claim for cylinder heads-let us run whatever head you want, no porting or polishing, welding, port plates, ect, my point, you blow everybody away, if I'm there, your heads are going home with me Shortblock-stock or steel rods, any compression,stock oiling system, no externals, dry sumps, ect allow 150lb weight break for automatics-only reason I say this, much as we would all like to see a stick only class, there are more autos out there Just a few random thoughts on Sunday. I'm off to the track. |
Re: Bring back super/mod...
This much I can tell you from having lived and breathed Super Modified in the beginning and I am sure FJ and Mike will back this up it was not cheap then and hard to police with the rules then. With all the rules everybody wants do you really think NHRA will support this. When Voeglin proposed the first rules in 1974 it was to be a Heads up Elminator just like the first CarCraft Econo Dragster rules around 1971 or 1972!
Just survey Voeglin Daniels FJ Houser Stevens Ed Wright Fadely Keener and Merc only ran SM a short time in 75 They were the Kings of D/MP C/MP and E/MP Quote:
|
Re: Bring back super/mod...
Super mod was a great class, I'm sure. It was, and still could be very entertaining. But, it didn't have a $500 cylinder head exchange-claimer. That would surely keep the cost down. I'm like the one guy, you dominate, there will be a fight fight those heads. We have to be realistic, and let existing back-halfed cars in. The claimer head rule, is far better then the claim the whole engine rule, or sealed motors.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.