Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Quote:
In a race car, in addition to the drag based on the drag coefficient number of the particular body, you have to deal with two other issues; lift and ground effects. In an airplane, the ground effect only occurs while accelerating during take-off and decelerating during the landing, with drag effecting the most during the takeoff. There is no ground effects after level flight and lift is zero. However, in a race car, you have both the lift and ground effects influencing the car during the whole run and also having an impact on the acceleration and handling of the car. Then add a big scoop to the hood and now you have another additional item effecting the performance of the vehicle. |
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Please explain how a plane stays in level flight with zero lift. Would think it would need lift equal to its weight.
|
Re: Bad Stockers, maybe too bad!
Quote:
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Quote:
There are four forces that keep the airplane; thrust, weight, lift and drag. Thrust, like any other object, keeps and maintains the forward motion. Weight maintains the center of gravity or the center of mass so the airplane can fly as close to level as its design, minimizing the aircraft controls input. Its correlation is to thrust for its forward motion. Drag, as any other object in motion is always there and the airplane, like any other vehicle, is designed to reduce the drag by reducing its footprint or coefficient of drag. Lift is dependent of the airflow around the object as it moves forward due to thrust. There are other variables such as the shape of the object and weight. In the case of an airplane, the air moves around the wings give and maintain the airplane lift. Zero lift is a term used in flight dynamics science in which during level flight there is an equilibrium of the yaw, pitch and roll axis during flight which is also known as leveled wings or Zero bank angle. In this configuration, the forces are balanced for optimum aircraft performance and operation. |
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Yeah, but how much faster would that airplane run the 1/4 mile in if it was 10% lighter and more aerodynamic? Because that is what we are talking about here with the camaro vs vette. Same engine
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
It's difficult to debate the Corvette's need for some significant and immediate factor assistance.
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Quote:
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Quote:
I enjoy my ridiculously under-factored car. I just want to point out a few things some people don't realize is happening. The Factory cars get crap all the time about their factors.Its time some traditional cars get the spotlight. And what better car than someone who is asking for it with "The Baddest B Stocker in the Country", when its really a AA Stocker Quote:
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
Quote:
|
Re: Who's the Baddest B/SA now?
I guess we will have to wait another year to see who is the Baddest B/SA.
I don't Think "God's Gift to the LS1" will grace us with his presence this year even though he is still entered. All you other fools with your low power engines will have to fight it out for Second place in the hearts and minds of everyone. We all know if he was here, you wouldn't even be in B. Can't wait to see whos gets to hold the Fake Crown this year. I can already see the relief on some competitors faces, Thankful he spared them this year. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.