Re: What's wrong with Stock?
The only problem that I see with the new cars is that they make the old cars look......old.....and slow.
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
I think we pretty much know what's wrong.
Time to start a thread about how to fix it. I'd do that myself, but I haven't wrapped my brain all the way around this. This is not gonna be easy. This deal has been five years in the making. I suggest make it pithy ..Hit the high points first. No complex formulas..Dial over , dial under , move a class up , down ,add this % , take away this %, etc .etc, They won't pay attention to that stuff , nor will most here . Keep it relatively simple, practical, and workable. Go... |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
I have been working on an older car to run in A, B or C stock. I'm just about to shelve the idea because I'm not sure even my super-gas car could run with the new cars in stock. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
The hard part is getting everything in the "right" class but, after a few events it will sort itself out. Now that's gonna hurt some feelings |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
I could be wrong,but I doubt that will work.The last national event that I went to had 13 Comp cars. http://www.dragracecentral.com/DRCSt...r2014#indextop With participation that low,I don't even know why they bother running the class. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
http://classracer.com/classforum/sho...3&postcount=98 |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
3 Attachment(s)
In October of 2009 an attorney wrote to Linda Louie, nhra attorney, to inquire about nhra membership rights. Ms Louie responded by saying we had no rights and then offered nhra's position on the new CJ's and Challengers. Even though our attorney never brought up the subject of new cars in her letter.
I have attached a copy of the three page letter to this post. Hope it comes through. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
I wonder if NHRA would allow me to run a new engine combination for my 1967 Camaro, if Chevrolet developed a new engine. This is exactly what NHRA did with regards to the 2009 Dragpak, with the 345 engine, rated at 305 HP! Think about it. The 2009 Dragpak is 5 years old and the factory is still bringing out new engine combinations! That being the case, the new engine combination should only be run in a 2014 Dragpak, not a 2009 or the 2010 year body. Again, I am not angry with anyone for taking advantage. I know I would do the same thing. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.