Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

All we're asking for is be smart about when you go fast, you're not the only one who runs the 70-71 B-body six pac.

Going too fast in qualfying is just plain silly. Add weight, change the shift point, disconnect the vaccum to the secondaries, just do something.

The magic number is -1.15 under or 10.40 in B/SA and 10.15 in A/SA. Try to run slower than those numbers unless you absolutly have to.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

I wonder who asked for a HP reduction on the 86 Chevy V-6 pick me up truck? Like it needs one?

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

Thumbs up to the guys who actually run their cars down the track like the race cars they are.

The AHFS is not fair for the combo's with small car #'s, period. It's NHRA's ignorance to "award" HP on different body types with same engines yet throw you in with others when they want to. You all know it's the owner/drivers ability to make the car go down the track, not the body type, the $$ (it helps) or East or West of the Rockys.

You seen what the 396 guys did for their combo, make some calls, play some games. Works out as long as you have enough cars in the combo and races to go to. Stock racing is not just racing anymore with a "performance based race car" but how to play a game.

Keep your eye on the "six pack" hit, I don't think it said "B body only", and if it did, well, NHRA could lump all the six packs together as they have for other combos.

If everyone would just remember why they race S/SS, performance, flat out drag racing, and run their cars like a "real" race car not a reality game show maybe NHRA could do away with AHFS and support the racers like years ago.

Just how many of you like to see guys "lifting", it sucks to be there and see that, might as well be a ".90"class. I remember when everyone actually ran them out the door, now it's the "class" in class racing thats gone out the door.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

Scott,
In the interest of fairness, please add 300 lbs to your car, disconnect the end carbs and take out 25 degrees of timing to slow your car down to the level of those who are complaining about your obvious advantage.
You should be ashamed of going fast!
John
P.S.
Rich,
Modified cars get the index for the class hit, not individual combos.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

THANK YOU JOHN

By the way did you find the problem with your engine?

Thanks Again
Rich

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

Actually, the FEWER cars there are running a certain combination, the EASIER it is to keep it under control. Look to see who DID NOT get hit among the fast cars to see this is true. The iron head 396 ALMOST got hit, and the more popular aluminum head 396 DID get hit. There are a LOT more 396 cars than there are Shelby Mustangs, the only Shelby that got hit this year ran more than 1.4 under. That's ONE example, showing that the Shelby guys have an easier time protecting their combination for the most part. They've been smart, and done a good job of protecting their combination.

The number one most obvious and fatal flaw in the AHFS is that some of the softest combinations that have small car counts never get hit despite actually being faster than more popular combinations with a higher car count that do get hit.

There is no way to do away with the AHFS with the current make up of Stock and Super Stock, and you sure as Hell don't want to replace it with a bunch of people, because you are not going to find enough honest people representing a broad enough cross section of the classes to give fair representation to everyone.

Racing has always been a game, and the really fast guys don't show you what they have on every pass, they never have. Sandbagging will NEVER leave class racing.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

I agree with Alan.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

Gene,
We agree 100%!!

Mr. Mason,

I guess the hours in the garage or the $ weve spent were not in the right place. We do and have raced a long time a psychiatrist or brake specialist might have been a better investment.

Mr. Hill,

I was done but decided I would share the facts. 3rd rd at a national event when yoiu've been driving fairly well I would think you would give it everything you had, We DID!! Wesley was .002 or 5 and Chad was .031. Sixty foots and 660 were in favor of Chad by 3 hundredths. Damn close in my book so Chad lifted at about 1,100 when Wesley started goin away but mind you goin away was never more than a wheel. Pomona was a mistake and we knew it. We did not expect the car to run that fast and had made several changes that should have kept it from doing so but instead we may have found a few things that we did not expect.

To the best of my knowledge these are the facts, if you would like at anytime we could discuss this further.


Thank you!!

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

Well, some people never seem to figure out how to make a car "run", so they favor "games", I guess that's so they can have a chance. It's not the "class" racing I respected and always wanted to be a part of anymore. Why should you have to go slower than your car is capable of on the race track? If your scared of speed and ET, try a lower class, don't lift.

If you look at the races and parts of the country they are run in you will see for the average guy in a low car count combo it's impossible to "save" your combo, fast runs happen, and you can't take them back.

Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced
 

I have one question? Is there anyone that can not run the index, due to the horsepower hit? You might lose an advantage in class, But these cars can still go fast enough to win an event.
This IS a performance based eliminator.
I think the AHFS is a good idea, BUT they should tear cars down for the automatic stuff. And they should altitude correct all runs, including altitude factored tracks.
I remember the "GOOD OLD DAYS" when the OUIJA (pronouned WE-GEE) BOARD or the DART BOARD were the main source of the fickle finger of factor.I remember engines getting horsepower when there were 2 or 3 faster combos in the same class. Just because they were'nt politically correct.
And I'm not being a crybaby because the combo we ran never got factored.
I think you will see more guys quitting because of sandbagging than the economy. What fun is it to run to 1000 ft and shut down or run 300 pounds heavy.
This is supossed to be racing not coordinated swimming
This is why I'll never go back to a horsepower oriented class. If my index gets hit everyone in the class has to work harder.