CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=16686)

JRyan 03-30-2009 08:36 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Gary don't forget about Dave Baumhefners Nova in division 5 as well. Dave's was I believe a 71' 350 270HP? Can't remember for sure. That car hasn't been around since about 2000. I think your correct about Steve's being a 350 as well. Keith did have great success driving them as well. He also ran his B/SA Nova in superstock a couple times as well.

Rick Ryan

FrankChastain 03-31-2009 05:27 AM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Can't remember what year the Nova was maybe a 70, but it was called NovaCane and had a needle drawn through the name. Ran in div2. Think the car was out of the Miami area, pretty quick.....Any body remember this car?????

Bobby Zlatkin 03-31-2009 08:33 AM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Yes, it was Ken & Pop Andrews white '69 255 HP.

Neal Derochie 03-31-2009 01:07 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Another div 5 car was AL kuehl's Nova , if i remember correctly he won Topeka with it , Al post on here once in a while, maybe he will give some insight.

GarysZ24 03-31-2009 05:42 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JRyan (Post 112390)
Gary don't forget about Dave Baumhefners Nova in division 5 as well. Dave's was I believe a 71' 350 270HP? Can't remember for sure. That car hasn't been around since about 2000. I think your correct about Steve's being a 350 as well. Keith did have great success driving them as well. He also ran his B/SA Nova in superstock a couple times as well.

Rick Ryan

You got me Rick...I did forget, but sure enjoyed watching Dave's Nova too...I thought those cars made great SS'ers, and if I could afford one, that would be a Chevy body I'd want to have for a second race car! Since there were so many Camaros around, I often rooted for the Nova's to win any time they had to race each other....those were the days.....

Bob Don 03-31-2009 09:17 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
I realize this is a bit dated, but at the 1977 US Nationals, John Dawley Jr. was SS/L Class Championship with a '68 small block Nova.

GarysZ24 04-13-2009 07:41 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Kuehl (Post 114590)
The Nova has more rear over hang , less front overhang , and a higher center of gravity . Is the Aerodynamics of the 68 to 72 Nova really any worse than a 66 to 67 Nova or a 65 Nova ? I would like to hear some thoughts on that . Al

Al, far be it for me to say, but I always thought that since the 68-72 Novas had the extra rear over-hang (plus the shorter front overhang), that they'd be more desireable for traction purposes than the Camaros of that vintage---besides, the swoopy style from the roof to the trunk I thought gave them the aero edge over the more boxy look of the Camaro...they'd sure get my vote, and since I owned/raced Pontiac's version of that car (the Ventura), to my first and only (so far) divisional championship (1981 Div. V Street), I have fond memories of that car/body style...I wish I would've kept that car, and made a stocker out of it--it possibly could've been something between an L/SA, and a N/SA with the Pontiac 350V8, Turbo 350 auto, and 2bbl carb???

As someone else mentioned in an earlier post, I think the addition of the GT classes, and the modern day FI cars became the beginning of the end of them in SS...but why not the Camaros too??? Perhaps there's 350-427 reasons they're still popular....especially the BA & CA ones???

GarysZ24 04-13-2009 09:29 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Just saw Steve Koppiens Nova...I rest my case as to why I think they're better SS'ers than Camaros---narrower body, the hatchback look, and the same suspension/chassis type (leaf sprung rear, with the uni-body chassis, that had subframe connectors attached to handle the rigors of racing--especially part-time on two wheels...as Bob Frey would say, WAY UP THERE ON THE "COOL O METER", or "COOLOMETER"!!!

GarysZ24 07-18-2009 04:58 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Hi Al,

Sorry it took so long to reply back to your post of mid-April, but with me not having the funds to race this year, I've been a bit lax in checking this site out...however, the one race I was able to enjoy so far this year was around the same time (April 13th), as your last two posts, so that helped...

I'm sure I saw the photo of your car, and it's right up there on the Coolometer as those others we both spoke of here in this thread are/were!!! :) I hope to see a photo of that Pontiac Ventura S/S car you spoke of, because that would surely let me know the potential my former Ventura had...

Did you notice that Steve Berlau had his 68 Nova SS/GA car last month in Denver at the LODRS 5-3 race? In spite of the fact that he hasn't been racing much (at least on this level recently), he still qualified 13th (out of 27 total cars), with a 1.050 under 10.65 on the altitude adjusted 11.70 index...that's pretty cool don't you think???

mtkawboy 07-18-2009 06:05 PM

Re: Why dont you see 68-72 nova super stock cars?
 
Paul Berg in Div 2 used to mess around with a friends 68 327/325 Nova. Never seriously run as a stocker but its the only one Ive ever seen. Its a 327/350 motor only with a Q-jet on it, back in the 7 inch tire days. I think it might have a lot of potential if its still around. It had Grasspower on the side if my memory is correct. Paul runs his brothers I/S 81 Camaro now after a 35 year vacation from racing. Sorry I guess its called a Chevy 11 back then and its rated at 300 hp now


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.