Re: Disclaimer?
 

True but it still dosent have the engine thats a legal (Emmisions certified) street engine for the year car as it came with off the show room.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

T.hat is true but most of the cars in ss/s are put together to represent the cars that fit a certain class. Example------your mothers 6 cyl. powerglide nova can be put together as a B/S 396/375 as long as the correct parts and trim are there.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

Exactly what difference does that make? How many race cars out there could pass emmissions when set up for the track (I did with my stocker BTW)
You guys are working every possible angle and IMHO sound silly.
NHRA has found these cars, the Shelby Fords, and the single 4 barrel Hemi cars Legal.
And thats that.
Stamping your feet isn't going to do any good Your choice has not changed either continue to race or don't. And if you're not racing. How about leaving it up to those that do.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

That is why they can't be titled and driven on the street. It has nothing to do with racing. It has to do with regulations and liabilities.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

The bold text is exactly the problem. It changes the basic principle of Stock Eliminator that goes back decades. It creates a loophole you can drive Mike Edwards' Pro Stock car through. The "new" rule about what is/can be "accepted" in Stock is written in B.S. "legalese" so that NHRA can come in and run over every current participant any time they want (read: any time they can get paid off to do it).

And it has everything to do with "racing". Considering it allows NHRA to decide who has paid them (NHRA) enough money to secure an insurmountable advantage over their competition. Basically what they've created is an extortion racket. They can say to any OEM "if you want to get a killer ringer approved for Stock, pay up."

Re: Disclaimer?
 

Hey Art, got Dyno results from a buddies 3.6 6cylinder Camaro....NOTHING absolutley NOTHING touched but the tune , 490hp......... NOTHING but a tune....told you when someone figure out the VVT and DI it would be evil...

Next when the NHRA classifies those theyll be saying DI cars shouldnt be allowed and VVT since you can lope your lift. Etc....Etc....

I told you thats the next "killer" combo, even when they rate it at 300 advertised. With some sticks in it, 550 is no problem.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

Alan, Ive asked this before (not of you) and everyone seemed to evade answering it.

Ok here are some "Facts"

Cars are not titled at the factory and you can depending on state even purchase one from a dealer WITHOUT having it titled.

So, next I can LEGALLY Title this vehicle in the State of Ohio.

So let me ask, If I do legally title this car and it is "street legal" and Emission Legal (Many counties in Ohio do NOT have emission requirments)

Then am I ok in your eyes ?

Hmm maybe there a business gambit for me, bring me your DP and I will get it titled and liscenced LEGALLY in the State of Ohio.

So say all 100 Dp owners do that ? Or at LEAST have the opportunity to do that, (we all know many racers whos cars arent or werent ever titled)

So say they have the ability or the opportunity to do that , and some do some dont just like the other Stockers.....

Then in your mind are the cars 100% fine or are your reasons not really all inclusive of the Title issues ?

I plan to do this, maybe before Norwalk I will....then I can post a copy of the title in the window for everyone to see....

Re: Disclaimer?
 

The "title" itself is not the issue, it is a subset of the issue, as is the lack of a valid VIN. The cars are not production cars, period. They do not meet federal standards for safety, emissions, or fuel economy. The fact that safety, emissions, and fuel mileage standards now exist or are more stringent than they were 20, 30, or 40 years ago is irrelevant. Even if a county or other municipality does not require emissions or safety testing, the federal agencies do require those standards to be met before the OEM can offer the cars for sale in the U.S. for use on the street, regardless of we they are sold.

The original basic principle behind Stock Eliminator was that it would consist of nothing but vehicles that were fully legal and certified for production and street use in the U.S. That was the whole purpose of the class. Until recently, the most basic rules for Stock Eliminator strictly and specifically prohibited export versions and other cars that were not federal certified for production and street use. Those rules were written for the specific purpose of preventing the problems these new cars are causing.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

You just dont get it. Even if you "Make up" a car from a 6 cylinder at least the car was avaliable from the dealer with a 396, FE 428, 426 Hemi (Chev, Ford, Mopar)or whatever you choose to build and race. Show me just ONE DP or Blower Mustang with the engine combo being used for stock with a show room engine combo being driven LEGALY on the street with registration and tags and insurance.

Re: Disclaimer?
 

Ummm, I'm not throwing stones here! I'm just curious as to whether the cars come with some affixed warning or if papers have to be signed as to intent or what.