Re: Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?
 

Topeka stock; p/sa and brainerd super stock gt/ma did`nt run under index and they . won class. Tom

Re: Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?
 

I believe when they do that they don't get a wally or contingency $$.You're just called class winner.You won't get rich on the contingency anyway.
My point about the .001 under is that it used to be a big deal to win class,at any event.
Now they've dumbed it down to the point where it isn't a big deal anymore,except if it's your first.
I usually have single runs when I run class,due to the fact there was only one other T car in
Div. 1.That car only came out sporadically.Now I understand two more are in the works.I welcome the challenge.

Re: Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?
 

Steve just go run him..... Everyone want to see a full out 1.10 under EF/S class final!!! ;)

Re: Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?
 

Dan Fletcher was listed as class winner at Brainerd...less than a tenth under.
Is Dan a disgrace to class racing:rolleyes: ?..or has this class win stuff become B.S.
(with the exception of Indy of course)

Re: Do you still need to go 50 under to win class?
 

Please,Dan was that slow because he lifted early.Check out the MPH on class runoffs for an indicator of how quick a car potentially is.
You can stop rolling your eyes now.Crosseyedness is a result of eye rolling.:>):>)