Re: Stocker to superstocker
any new cj ford or DP will be just fine tighten them lugs
|
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Quote:
|
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Quote:
Kevin |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Quote:
Kevin |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Roger,stop giving our secrets away.:<):<)
|
Re: Stocker to superstocker
'68-'70 AMC AMX 2-seat 97" wheelbase. Will run fast in Stock or Super Stock on 9" slicks with Calvert rear springs and bars. I went 10.50's in D/S with a 390 and loaded a "fair" SS 390 and a steeper rear gear. Went 10.00 in SS/H. The 290, 390 (either 1968-1969 or 1970 (different specs) and '70 360
will all under by a significant margin with the 290 as Roger mentioned probably the best to build (and cheapest). But you probably want a belly button car...:( |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
jeff, are you aware of any "approved" 290 pistons? 2bbl or 4bbl?
i'm not.... that's why i've got one (from ED F) that's gonna get sent in (to a mfgr) one of these days, probably this fall |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Tom,
Check with Hemmy Adkins or Garrett Ghezzi (SS/MA from Joliet, IL) for NHRA piston. Dwight Southerland played around with one on a dyno also. |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Hi Roger
Back in the late 70s and early 80s I ran a 69 AMX in NHRA Super Stock with a 390 engine. Not wanting to move the rear springs or alter the wheel tubs the only tire that would fit was a 9 in tire. I have thought about geting another AMX but I would not want to alter the rear of the car. What if any thing could be done to use a bigger tire with the stock length rear end and no alteration to the spring location and the wheel tubs? Thanks Allen |
Re: Stocker to superstocker
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.