Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Quote:
|
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Boy drag racers are a fickle group lol.
One group wants change and another hates it. It's just a personality thing. |
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Although many want to see Pro Stock take a step back to get closer to OEM, it would be a costly transition. All of the current development would have to be shelved and parity would take a back seat for a year or so. All of the bodies are different, new chassis would have to be developed, and more money would have to be poured into engine development, not to mention the headache of creating fair engine rules for all of the current engine formats. With the parity that has been achieved today, how could you sell the current teams on making this costly transition? Also, would it be worth the change and would it bring enough new fans to the sport to validate the change? I for one do not know if it would be worth it or if this risk would pay off. We have the OEM Copos, DragPaks, and CJ's out now and I don't know if that even that has helped increase the fan base.
In all honesty, it would be better just to create another class and call it OEM Pro Stock and go from there. |
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
I'm with Ken and Dave (and others of similar mind). Main reason I watch PS is because their collective work ethic and what they can run given their restrictions...same reason I love Comp. For that matter watch the Hemi Shootout cars sometimes, the top runners thrash like crazy for every hundredth of a second.
I'm so over the Force/Shumacher nitro show... |
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Adriel,
Excellent points, but if things stay the same there may not be a Pro Stock, what will all of their investment and r&d be worth then. Why do you think there is no factory backing of the so call factory hot rods. Why did Ford insist on running a car in NASCAR that resembled there factory cars for 2013. If people like the way Pro Stocks are now that's fine with me, its just my opinion its not as popular as it could be. As far as the new cars in stock bringing more fans in. I would think that the big three would not invest in programs they feel are not worth the investment. Although some may not like the new stockers, there has been more talk about stock in the last few years in many forms of media than in any years past. There are more competition numbers in Stock than there have ever been. I'm not saying its perfect, but it is something to build on for survival. |
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
I hate to say it but there is little excitement for the average fan in Pro-Stock. 99% of the time the cars go straight down the track. Pro-mod is growing every year in popularity. Turbos, superchargers, nitrous, nitromethane. A nice mix of old and new bodies. It's fun to watch.
|
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Quote:
|
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Pro Stock may need a marketing change.
Think it would help bring more in Fans to a ProAm or Sportsnam Level Race. My frustration with the Bodies is that they went NASCAR. Despite that I think a bigger draw would be Seperating Professional and Sportsman. Moving Pro Stock to Sportsman. Get back to advertising PRO STOCK has the Headliner !! my 2cents d |
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
Pro Stock is a bore and I completely agree with Ken. Rekindle the original spirit of the class, as it was in the 1970s, a true competition of Detroit muscle.
|
Re: Pro stock NHRA unwanted child at the U.S Nationals
It seems that PS is stuck in time.
The car makers have not made a carbureted car in 27 years yet EFI is not allowed in PS. (yet) At least NASCAR FINIALLY allowed efi this year. Those PS bodies are ridiculous looking...IMO |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.