CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   front end 69 nova (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=51347)

Jim Cimarolli 01-18-2014 10:16 AM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mcashman (Post 416941)
What is the point of the longer ball joints?

They help to keep the camber from going off the radar at full lift.

Alan Roehrich 01-18-2014 10:31 AM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
The idea behind all of this is to reduce the friction, so that the front suspension moves freely, allowing the shocks to have complete control. It makes the front end motion very consistent and repeatable. The other part, as Jim said, is the longer upper ball joints keep the camber from making radical changes as the front end moves through its range of travel.

Another added bonus is increased front end travel. Combine this with the correct springs (which should lower the static ride height considerably, 1" to 2") and a set of shocks such as Santhuffs, and you have a front suspension that you can count on to allow the car to leave hard with the rear tires planted, yet remain easily controllable and driveable.

With offset upper control arm shafts for extra alignment adjustment, you can get the car to track straight consistently. They recently allowed aftermarket parts to reduce bump steer as well.

Find a shop that knows what they're doing, have the front end aligned with your weight in the driver's seat, you want no more than 1/8" toe in, 6 degrees or more positive caster, and zero degrees camber, at around 2" above static ride height, because you want the alignment as close to perfect as possible at the ride height the car has going done the track.

One thing I left out of this post, and a good racer reminded me of it, was that the Nova has less clearance than a Camaro, so you may not be able to run the exact caster and camber settings. You'll need to make the adjustments and then check carefully for clearance to make sure you do not create a tire clearance problem.

J&S Racing 01-18-2014 08:52 PM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
2 Attachment(s)
Attachment 22650

Attachment 22651

Did the install on mine today. Overall not that bad.

joe cool 01-19-2014 11:43 AM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
Sorry for all the dumb questions,With increased travel do you end up with a bumpsteer problem?

Alan Roehrich 01-19-2014 12:01 PM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joe cool (Post 417109)
Sorry for all the dumb questions,With increased travel do you end up with a bumpsteer problem?

You might. You can buy a bump steer kit to solve that problem, they're legal in Stock now.

Stockerchevy 02-13-2014 04:03 PM

Re: front end 69 nova
 
Has anybody had any binding issues with the .90 long proforged 101-10017 with stock control arms? I assume the upper bumpers would be the defining length on how far the upper A-Arms can stretch and work before excessive negative camber becomes an issue?

Jim


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.