Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

Hehehehe :rolleyes:

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

Yes, I agree with you Bill.
Should not be on same qualifying sheet with NO penalty towards the AHFS.

Than the other cars should be able to go ALL OUT With No Penalty As Well.
Make it fair for everyone.

Or as i stated in my 1st post: Put them in their own Eliminator, their is enough cars
that's for sure.

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

On Facebook, I suggested letting them run their traditional (AAA, AA, BB CC, etc) in Q-1-2-3, then change weight and stuff to run the FSS race. Might help, might not. I do think they should get HP, but things are kind of skewed. What does, say, a FS/B COPO weight in FS/B compared to BB/SA? What is the fair way to give hp for a "fake" Class/Index?

While we are at it, why not let ALL the new cars into FSS? The lower-HP cars compared to the big cars, cars in say C/SA down, cars like Charley Downing, etc. Why not let all cars in FSS, run it like Comp, handicapped start, flat out.? That way, they could all stay in their own class, and be eligible for AHFS penalties.

Unless that's the way NHRA and the OEM's want it with FSS. Heads-up, run hard, no penalty. $$$$$ talks.

Just some thoughts.

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

If these cars were held to the AHFS, I would thank that they would back there cars down to about one second under, still end up near top of list. Seems that same cars would still be going home.

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

In 1972 NHRA attempted to legislate an arbitrary "10-year rule" for Stock Eliminator. It was a poorly conceived plan that failed for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was the first OPEC/Big Oil-engineered fuel shortage crisis and the ensuing horsepower reductions across the American car market. For over 20 years very few high performance cars were manufactured for the domestic market and most of them were at a competitive disadvantage when paired against existing combinations. The "classic" muscle cars ruled in Stock Eliminator. Eventually, only cars manufactured in 1959 and earlier suffered banishment from the eliminator bracket.

In either 1997 or 1998, the Official Rulebook included paragraph inviting OEM to create "special production runs" of vehicles that "need not be showroom available" to be included in the Classification Guide. It only took ten years for manufacturers to avail themselves of this opportunity and begin licensing outside vendors to begin spitting out cookie-cutter models and kits of race-only "Stockers." (That brings to mind the old joke about a football game during which one team retired to the locker room and it only required eight plays for the inept competition to find the end zone.)

Fast forward to 2014 and finally someone has devised a means to the ultimate goal of a Stock Eliminator field composed only of late model factory Stock cars. Give a few models of very expensive, purpose-built factory race cars a free pass to compete without the artificial ceiling of the AHFS and we're only a heart-beat away from Nirvana, a field composed of only cars that are newer than 10 years! It's funny how things work out.

c

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

Well stated ,Chuck..Wish you would post here more often.
Of course, there are a few "renegades" like Larry Hill, Gary Summers, and Paul Wong
mucking up the works.
Will we see another "rule change" soon? Most likely!

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

I remember being in high school and seeing Mike Walters at Quaker City on Friday night for test-and-tune with his '67 Camaro Stocker changing converters in the dark trying to squeeze out a few more hundreths. That has stuck with me for 30 years. In my humble opinion that is what Class Racing is all about. When you can go out now, spend 6-figures, and buy something that has to lift at the 1000' mark and still qualifies in the top of the field it makes me think NHRA is missing the point. I don't begrudge the folks that run them and Lord knows if my wife and I could afford one we'd buy it but I don't think it's healthy for the sport how they're doing it and believe it will be the demise of Class Racing. We have a 2004 Corvette that is legal for IHRA Pure Stock but why would I spend the time, effort and money to go run B/SA in IHRA when Wilkes is now running solidly in the 9.80s with his new COPO? That makes zero sense.

Scott

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

Since the beginning of Pro Stock, it was my favorite class. Over the past several years, as the Pro Stocks have gone the route of Funny car....perhaps a slight resemblance to a production body, my interest has deteriorated.
Why not re-engineer Pro Stock based on these new factory muscle cars and reinvigorate the excitement in doorslammer racing that was the basis for this great sport. Hell, have a 64 car field and get the juices flowing.
After a 43 year career in the auto industry, the one constant was change. If your organization did not constantly look ahead and navigate the ever changing marketplace, you were doomed to fail. Creativity and a bit of risk taking are ingredients to success.
The new cars are a great addition to the sport. They just need to find the right home for them to compete in. I hope the leadership (another key success factor) of our sanctioning bodies is equipped to deal with this need. If not, like in other businesses, get the right leaders in place and move forward.

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

Mike used to run all the Div 1 races, If you came over to say Hi, you were talking to his feet because he was under the car and many times after the sun went down.

Re: "Indy Observation" In Stock Elim.
 

To me that was the cool part about class racing. Guys and gals thrashing on the car between rounds to squeeze every last bit of ET out of their combination. I'm not familiar with the new cars other than from a spectator's viewpoint and don't know if they require as much "parts testing" etc. but I just don't see it being the same. Mike was laying on the asphalt that night between testing hits changing the converter on his back with a flashlight late at night. If I remember correctly he was alone. I was impressed by that.

Scott