Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Quote:
|
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
With my 65 Impala build, I am able to use a 585 Holley on my 396/325 (410 CI now)I do have one to use, just need to find a manifold. I always feel more comfortable with Holleys too, opinions vs Q-Jet. I will probaly try both anyway.
Will Lamprecht I/SA 65 Impala looking to 2016 season. |
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Just a thought, maybe better fuel distribution through the manifold with the Holley vs the spread bore Q-Jet even though more CFM with Q-Jet?
Will Lamprecht - |
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Quote:
Joe Sr. and I raced a 66 Chevy II way back when you had to use the Holley or Carter , and not the Q jet. Still possibly the fastest SS/J car in the country at the end of 1973..Record holder, and No. 1 qualifier at the World Finals in Amarillo...with the 540 Holley. You could use a Q Jet on a 67. This is the reason ,I believe , that Larry Tores built the 67 post car. Anyway, I think we were talking about SS/GT here. Don't you think the small Holley should be rated less than the big one, or the Carter, for that matter? Also nobody has mentioned the little Corvette WCFB yet, on the 520 head combos |
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Quote:
And let me guess; the car is quicker, but only because you're carrying less weight down the track, with that lighter wallet! |
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Quote:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/n...ps7a6c0c73.jpg |
Re: Differences in Q-jet vs 585 Holley vs 4GC
Holleys are easier to change the boosters on. Just a thought.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.