Re: Jim hale
Quote:
|
Re: Jim hale
Welcome to the new "Stock"
Something like this, maybe? http://www.cfrperformance.com/CHRYSL...cfr-7117-z.htm What I want to know if they were able to shake them down for the contingency plan. |
Re: Jim hale
Quote:
|
Re: Jim hale
You've got to be all over the map on this stuff too. You can't you use a Chevy II Moroso oil pan on any other models but you can use a race 426 reproduction pan on a 383 station wagon. Make sense to anyone? By the way congrats to Jim. I was waiting for the youngster with the big Pontiac to get it together and give you a run but it didn't happen this time.
|
Re: Jim hale
Quote:
|
Re: Jim hale
Quote:
|
Re: Jim hale
Quote:
Congrats Mr Hale and Team for a class win. |
Re: Jim hale
Quote:
Thanks |
Re: Jim hale
Look in Page 25 of the NHRA Accepted Products and you will find a multitude of aftermarket oil pans that have been approved for Stock Eliminator class for many other engine makes.
http://promod.nhra.com/userfiles/fil...edProducts.pdf |
Re: Jim hale
For the record here, this dude is not knocking Mr. Hale at all. Smart racers play the best cards they are holding.
My issue is this . I'm a fabricator by trade. How about if I took a stock 283 pan and added 3" to the bottom of it and showed up at Indy with it. Think it would fly? Of course not. ..and neither should a hemi pan be allowed on a basic 383. The reason why it is, is in my first post in this thread. Carry on... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.