Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
An existing transmission rule that appears to not be being enforced, is the rule stating that you have to use the clutch to change gears, and specifically banning clutchless gearboxes. I'm not gonna point fingers, but I'm seeing a lot of in-car videos of stockers clearly showing gearchanges made without touching the clutch.
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
It's unfortunate Ford and Chryslers don't have a SFI approved case. Then again I think stocker cars should have a vin number too. If safety is the issue. Better safe than sorry. The new cars have some serious power over older muscle cars with some combinations available. Maybe like all safety rules. It would come into play when certain E.T and speed is a factor.
Paul Haszlauer |
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
Ron |
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Wasn't the rule originally that 500 had to be built to run stock and 50 to run super stock?
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
[QUOTE=james schaechter;645398]
The good automatics are as quick as the stickshifts in most cases and some are quicker. And yet they don't share the same horsepower factors. |
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
|
Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.