Re: LT1 Nova
1 Attachment(s)
Original option sheet published by Yenko Chevrolet...funny thing is, aside from the "elaborate decals", the optional hood tach, and the emblems, everything else arrived on the cars from Chevrolet, and was straight regular production stuff...as a matter of fact, the 2 LT-1 Novas that went to Canada were equipped exactly the same as the Yenko Deuces, sans the stripes/emblems, and were sold through regular Chevrolet dealers north of the border...
|
Re: LT1 Nova
1 Attachment(s)
Letter from Don Yenko to Wally Parks...
|
Re: LT1 Nova
1 Attachment(s)
Another letter from Don Yenko, this time to Bill Dismuke...
|
Re: LT1 Nova
1 Attachment(s)
And another letter, this time from Donna Mae Mims (manager of sYc, Inc.) to Darwin Doll...the scan quality sucks, because it's on Donna Mae's signature pink stationary...
|
Re: LT1 Nova
Looking through our folder, we have somewhere around 10 or so of the original inventory sheets, which would be about +/- 120 cars, but we've reverse document several more than that...just for grins, here is a list we published back in '04 of some Vin#s, but we've since added cars to our database...
http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/show...ge/0#Post75999 |
Re: LT1 Nova
Quote:
I think you should build a LT-1 70 Corvette. I've had a nova(396 though) and a vettes(427 and 350's) and chicks dig the vette alot more. Plus your wife/girlfriend will let you spend more $ on the vette than that ugly nova. Having Fun, Alex PS-just KIDDING about ugly nova's, but not about running the vette... |
Re: LT1 Nova
Quote:
But I'm all for allowing the corporate approved parts and packages. I'm curious, if I looked at the 1970 AMA specifications for the Nova / Chevy II, does it have the LT-1 listed as an option? Because as far as I can tell, back in the day, if an item wasn't listed in the AMA specifications, it just didn't exist as far as NHRA was concerned. Likewise, if an item was listed, it should be as good as gold to NHRA. |
Re: LT1 Nova
Quote:
Quote:
BTW: from looking at some handwritten notes from Yenko, it looks like they were shooting for SS/F for the LT-1 Nova? Sound about right?? |
Re: LT1 Nova
Chevy 454; Please package all of your documentation and send it to me. I will contact GM, provide your info and ask them to apply for the inclusion of the Duece in the SCCG. It must be done this way; (protocal you know.) This sometimes is a slow process but now is a much better time to try than 1970; many things have changed in NHRA regarding this process.
My address is: Dr. Injector Shops Inc. 34703 16th Ave S. Federal Way, Wa. 98003 attn TT |
Re: LT1 Nova
Quote:
|
Re: LT1 Nova
Quote:
|
Re: LT1 Nova
Wow...haha. Guys really who cares? Maybe I took the reply the wrong way. It sounded like you were not for my suggestion about the "super cars" being able to run in AA/SA. And really all I was saying is I would like to see the Nova be accepted with an LT1 because it is a good combo to run. Lots of compression, holley carb...ect. And I would rather see this car accepted over another car with a power adder. The Nova was built by GM...not farmed out to a performance shop to be built. And if you ask if im new to this yes and no...racing for 10 years. And why would that matter anyways? We might as well stop this game of who is right or wrong because ultimatly NHRA/IHRA will make the final decision and they wont be looking at us going back in forth on a cheese ball message board to help make the call on whats going to be accepted.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.