CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Proposal for Old Cars in Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=24841)

Ed Fernandez 04-03-2010 02:34 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Miele (Post 179671)
Jeff,

Don't let it get to you. Anyone can build your combo, so to me there is no advantage.

As far as the moderator goes, yes Bruce is one of my moderators but don't let that bother you. Bruce has opinions and I have no problems with him expressing them. Bruce and I are on total opposite sides of this subject, but that's okay. I'm not going anywhere and I hope you don't.

I race a so called paper car in A and AA and was never the fastest, although it was competitive. I know have no chance to out run the new CJ's and DP's, but do you see me calling for the heads of NHRA and or the owners of these cars, no way. I have lots invested, money and time, but I see no difference with some who runs a soft combo and kicks my butt or runs these new cars, being out run is being out run. If I want to run with them, I will have to build one.

So Jeff, keeping on posting, no one on this site will stop you from expressing your opinion on this subject.

One other note, at the track, opinions on the new cars are way more positive the negative.

Kenny.I believe you can attribute it to a condition called internet muscles,especially the no names.

John Lang 04-03-2010 03:29 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
I've got my hand raised to be a Character reference for Jeff,, Cause he too wears a HEMI challenge cap!.....................Stand Tough, Jeff, don't let them get you down ! John

Jeff Teuton 04-03-2010 04:15 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
J. Dillinger PE #1, I actually lobbied for the 39 Hudson Terraplain Fastback Red in color, to be allowed in T/SA with the available 354 Hemi. I never got anywhere with that one either. Bruce, I was never aware that I was such a tale teller. For those who don't know me, I am the dealer @ Southland Dodge Chry Jeep for the last 42 years. I went racing for my first time in l958 when my brother Joe took me to the airport in Opelusus, LA. Joe and I were partners for over 30 years. He is the largest truck dealer in Louisiana. We started with 7 people and now have over 300 inspite of the economy. Thats the short version. Now Bruce, as to my involvement with the "crate motors" in stock, I knew about this project 2 years ago when John Danoto, an engineer with Mopar and also a stock truck racer, started it. We spoke several times and he was interested in the flat top Edlebrock head Top Stock motor we had run in IHRA. We ran it for years. I told him what I thought. Since Mopar had no heads available (none), the magnum head has long been gone, so NHRA allowed the Magnum R/T head in S/SS at +5, however Mopar quit making that head one month after NHRA allowed it. Mopar then got Edlebrock to make a knock off head for them, but the port matching that is standard on all the Edelbrocks is not done and that is the head for Stock Eliminator and it has a Mopar part number and casting number. The rest of the thing is like it was in 66 when the small block Mopar appeared. Just a brief history. And of course the bankruptcy, and the other public details. Now you know my involvement. As for the SRAC I do my best and will continue to do my best for S/SS. I really try to get my info at the races, more than on the net. I will continue to do this. It's a thankless job, but it keeps me off the street and out of the bars. If I decide to post more, I will call Drooze and dictate it. I hit my finger putting the SS motor in my new Challenger. Now it's your turn.

Jeff Teuton 04-03-2010 04:54 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
And the truth shall set you free. Mark Callanan, I see you are an H/SA racer. I ran 11.01 at No Problem in H/SA and you ran 11.10 or so at Lebanon Valley. I got a tenth or so on you. I will have to check with Nitro Joe for your fastest. You might be faster. I'm sorry this has gotten you so worked up. No harm was intended.

Mark Callanan 04-03-2010 06:01 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 179718)
And the truth shall set you free. Mark Callanan, I see you are an H/SA racer. I ran 11.01 at No Problem in H/SA and you ran 11.10 or so at Lebanon Valley. I got a tenth or so on you. I will have to check with Nitro Joe for your fastest. You might be faster. I'm sorry this has gotten you so worked up. No harm was intended.

Jeff did you run a 10.51 at 127?

Bruce Noland 04-03-2010 08:36 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 179706)
J. Dillinger PE #1, I actually lobbied for the 39 Hudson Terraplain Fastback Red in color, to be allowed in T/SA with the available 354 Hemi. I never got anywhere with that one either. Bruce, I was never aware that I was such a tale teller. For those who don't know me, I am the dealer @ Southland Dodge Chry Jeep for the last 42 years. I went racing for my first time in l958 when my brother Joe took me to the airport in Opelusus, LA. Joe and I were partners for over 30 years. He is the largest truck dealer in Louisiana. We started with 7 people and now have over 300 inspite of the economy. Thats the short version. Now Bruce, as to my involvement with the "crate motors" in stock, I knew about this project 2 years ago when John Danoto, an engineer with Mopar and also a stock truck racer, started it. We spoke several times and he was interested in the flat top Edlebrock head Top Stock motor we had run in IHRA. We ran it for years. I told him what I thought. Since Mopar had no heads available (none), the magnum head has long been gone, so NHRA allowed the Magnum R/T head in S/SS at +5, however Mopar quit making that head one month after NHRA allowed it. Mopar then got Edlebrock to make a knock off head for them, but the port matching that is standard on all the Edelbrocks is not done and that is the head for Stock Eliminator and it has a Mopar part number and casting number. The rest of the thing is like it was in 66 when the small block Mopar appeared. Just a brief history. And of course the bankruptcy, and the other public details. Now you know my involvement. As for the SRAC I do my best and will continue to do my best for S/SS. I really try to get my info at the races, more than on the net. I will continue to do this. It's a thankless job, but it keeps me off the street and out of the bars. If I decide to post more, I will call Drooze and dictate it. I hit my finger putting the SS motor in my new Challenger. Now it's your turn.

Jeff,
Just about what we thought. Thanks for your post. Take care of your finger.

Toby Lang 04-03-2010 08:44 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 179706)
J. Dillinger PE #1, I actually lobbied for the 39 Hudson Terraplain Fastback Red in color, to be allowed in T/SA with the available 354 Hemi. I never got anywhere with that one either. Bruce, I was never aware that I was such a tale teller. For those who don't know me, I am the dealer @ Southland Dodge Chry Jeep for the last 42 years. I went racing for my first time in l958 when my brother Joe took me to the airport in Opelusus, LA. Joe and I were partners for over 30 years. He is the largest truck dealer in Louisiana. We started with 7 people and now have over 300 inspite of the economy. Thats the short version. Now Bruce, as to my involvement with the "crate motors" in stock, I knew about this project 2 years ago when John Danoto, an engineer with Mopar and also a stock truck racer, started it. We spoke several times and he was interested in the flat top Edlebrock head Top Stock motor we had run in IHRA. We ran it for years. I told him what I thought. Since Mopar had no heads available (none), the magnum head has long been gone, so NHRA allowed the Magnum R/T head in S/SS at +5, however Mopar quit making that head one month after NHRA allowed it. Mopar then got Edlebrock to make a knock off head for them, but the port matching that is standard on all the Edelbrocks is not done and that is the head for Stock Eliminator and it has a Mopar part number and casting number. The rest of the thing is like it was in 66 when the small block Mopar appeared. Just a brief history. And of course the bankruptcy, and the other public details. Now you know my involvement. As for the SRAC I do my best and will continue to do my best for S/SS. I really try to get my info at the races, more than on the net. I will continue to do this. It's a thankless job, but it keeps me off the street and out of the bars. If I decide to post more, I will call Drooze and dictate it. I hit my finger putting the SS motor in my new Challenger. Now it's your turn.


Jeff,

I just have one thing to say:

Paragraphs are your friend! :)


-Toby

NewHemi 04-03-2010 09:35 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Come on,,, Paragraphs??? Paragraphs????

He said he hurt his finger, and in spite of that, he still spells better than Drooze....

That's OK Jeff.... We don't need no stinkin' paragraphs...

David
The New Hemi Guy

Chris "drooze" Wertman 04-03-2010 09:41 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NewHemi (Post 179787)
Come on,,, Paragraphs??? Paragraphs????

He said he hurt his finger, and in spite of that, he still spells better than Drooze....

That's OK Jeff.... We don't need no stinkin' paragraphs...

David
The New Hemi Guy

Yeah THIS From the Guy who when I told him to write Hemi Bunny on my goofy paintsuit spelled it BUNNEY...........

Yeah....thanks pop.

Barnstorm 04-03-2010 09:51 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
We all remember the fabulous feed that you put on at Byron US Class Nationals in 2001. And the hospitality at the Cajuns and the Nationals. Run what ever combos you want.....the minnesota 5651 SS/AH bunch.

Gary Parker 04-04-2010 04:48 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And the truth shall set you free. Mark Callanan, I see you are an H/SA racer. I ran 11.01 at No Problem in H/SA and you ran 11.10 or so at Lebanon Valley. I got a tenth or so on you. I will have to check with Nitro Joe for your fastest. You might be faster. I'm sorry this has gotten you so worked up. No harm was intended.

Jeff you seem to have forgotten the 10.88 you went on the free time trial against Jim
Schaechter. ( see 1320go and put in your car # 4022). And even if you car was light for the 10.51 @127 Thats a c/sa time. I think the car is beautiful and great in stock, just needs to be in the right class. Yes I run H , and I am very fast in the class, but it is with a TRUE H/SA car.

Bruce Noland 04-04-2010 06:51 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
In two or three years nhra Stock will consist of two body styles with different paint schemes. All the older cars will eventually find their way to IHRA, where it is available, and to other smaller racing associations; which may turn out to be the best result for everyone concerned. We know that IHRA wants racers and is willing to place these cars in classes where they cannot take advantage of the older cars and their owners. But, nhra Stock will have lost it heart and soul. Some people applaud this great OEM participation and claim it's the best thing for Stock. I don't agree.

X-TECH MAN 04-04-2010 07:14 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
[QUOTE=Bruce Noland; All the older cars will eventually find their way to IHRA,

I doubt it.......Maybe the cars will migrate after they are sold but the existing owners will take up another hobby. Ive heard some NHRA racers say the wouldnt race IHRA if "Hell Froze Over" and yet they never tried it before because of the crate motored classes, tracks to far away yet they travel from the east coast to Pomona every year, and any excuse they can come up with. If you dislike NHRA so damn much because of the way you are treated why not give it a season and try it. You just might be pleasantly surprised. For a couple of things..... you dont need grade points to enter a national event, and you dont have to give them your entry months in advance and enter via computer. Its all attitude and ego's. Sure the money isnt as good now but what happens when all of the sportsman cars stop racing NHRA and race only IHRA and the car counts are up. Do you think the sponsors will remain with NHRA? Get with Mike Baker, management, tech crew (Danny Waters, Hank Blankenship) and develope a real stock and S/S commitiee with someone who will listen to your concerns and input instead of turning a deft ear. The AHFS is a joke......you ALL know it. 1000 ft dumping sucks for everyone and most of all the spectators. Its almost like S/G except its at the finish instead of the starting line. Ive heard so may who say they have a fix (cure) for the AHFS but say NHRA wont listen and dosent care. Isnt it time to move on and try something different? Isnt it time to sitck together to save what you all love and live for? Isnt it time to do something ecxcept come up with excuses on why you didnt race with IHRA and continue to be lead around like "Sheep"? It wouldnt happen over night but in a short time I can see it making a difference. Its way less expensive and less head aches than trying to start another racing association. Believe me....I looked into it a LOT about 2 years ago and its finacial suicide in this economy and dealing with the mind set of the die hard NHRA racers. My 2 1/2 cents.

art leong 04-04-2010 08:04 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Jeff I haven't looked at this post for a while. It's amazing what it has morphed into.
How Dare you go out and build a car that is in the NHRA rule book?
Didn't you realize there were other racers in the class you picked to run?
If you had gone a best of 12.0 would they have chimed in trying to get you to go faster?
A lot of the naysayers have been commenting about the uselessness of the SRAC in the past. They must have had an awakening.
You have done as much if not more for the sportsman racer than anyone out there.
Keep having fun.

Jeff Teuton 04-04-2010 08:45 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
I ran those times in a test session before the Cajuns started. So What!! I ran the 10.88 in a no tech time trial, not qualifying, no weight. So What!! A couple years back I saw a B/SA run 9.98 @ 128 in a test session before the race. Last year I saw Roger Brogdon run 6.47 in Pro Stock testing. And many more. Now do you apologize for going fast? My name ain't Obama and I ain't apologizing for my car. I am proud of this car. The configuration I had when I ran is all anybody is guessing about. I ain't doing nothing different.

442OLDS 04-04-2010 08:55 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
I wasn't there,but at the Indy Fall Classic,I understand that there was some timing issues and cars that had never gone in the 10 second zone had done so.

Nitro Joe does a great job on the Stats,but there are sometimes "issues" and other circumstances that prevent the runs from being 100% accurate.

Maybe Mr Teuton's car had a timing issue on the day of testing? Clock malfunctioned?
Might have been 9.50,but who knows?

LOL!

Bruce Noland 04-04-2010 10:04 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Parker (Post 179815)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And the truth shall set you free. Mark Callanan, I see you are an H/SA racer. I ran 11.01 at No Problem in H/SA and you ran 11.10 or so at Lebanon Valley. I got a tenth or so on you. I will have to check with Nitro Joe for your fastest. You might be faster. I'm sorry this has gotten you so worked up. No harm was intended.

Jeff you seem to have forgotten the 10.88 you went on the free time trial against Jim
Schaechter. ( see 1320go and put in your car # 4022). And even if you car was light for the 10.51 @127 Thats a c/sa time. I think the car is beautiful and great in stock, just needs to be in the right class. Yes I run H , and I am very fast in the class, but it is with a TRUE H/SA car.

Gary,
The car wasn't light. He told some racers at Belle Rose he would have to put another driver in the car if it was going to run in G because he was too heavy. I thought that was funny.

bsa633 04-04-2010 10:27 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 179187)
I proposed accepting the 68 Dart/Cuda Hemi cars in Stock. The specs are in the book for the last 42 years, the parts are still available, the hp factor is about right using the specs in the guide and you could add weight and get to AA/S or AA/SA. 9 inch tires, springs, stock mounts, original seats (they still around), no tubs, like stock is. The cam is smaller than the 64/65 car. The current factor is about 7.1 lbs/hp.
How about the Viper with an automatic (or at least in SS). .

Yep sounds about right..it's allready a Circus,and then at the same time we can rid of all the current AA to H-I cars that dont really belong here anymore in a natural way...
Maybe we also should get the weight breaks down to 6.0 in Stock so there is room for progress with these new,and "new-old" cars..and SS..that should be scrapped,whats the idea to have Stockers outrunning SuperStockers?..(explain that to the fans)..

Well ..really maybe the time has come to scrapp Stock and move everything to SS?
I think that would probably be the best deal,then these new cars(and other "paper-deals") wouldn't have such a big advantage running big roller cams,good flowing heads,high single plane intakes and a big throttle body ,in reallity the factors would be much more inline with the rest of the competition if such a move happened! And not to forget,those new cars would be in the class they belong,but on the expense of alot of others!

khelms 04-04-2010 10:56 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Mr. Jeff. Im sorry that I had you propose the idea to legalize the very cool 68 Hemi cars for stock. There is no reason they shouldnt be, they have to add weight to get to AA just like my ZL-1, a L-88 vette, the Thunderbolt,ect. The parts are still availible and they are real cars. Start them at the factory 425hp and let "THE SYSTEM" work it out. I didnt mean for you to get into a Keyboard Sh##storm like this has become, but I know you will let this slide like mud off a crawfish...... I get to see every day how much Jeff does for ANY racer in need and have told him we need to give him a salary for all the time he spends talking to NHRA, IHRA, State and local Government (not just louisiana) on all the towing issues ect, ect...... Happy Easter to all!!!!

Lynn A McCarty 04-04-2010 11:10 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 179845)
My name ain't Obama and I ain't apologizing for my car. I am proud of this car.

We are proud of you too Jeff, keep up the good ideas and good work!

rapid1055 04-04-2010 11:20 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
The bottom line...Is Jeff correct with his facts regarding specs being in the book for the last 42 years for the 68 Dart/Cuda Hemi cars in stock.

Many of the arguments appeared not to be based on the validity of his facts.
Some ex's...9" tires are way better....Run a 10.5 tire and move to the IHRA....It's April fools... He's a Mopar dealer... etc.

I believe that Art stated it very well.

Also, My hope is that Bruce Noland's predictions that we might be headed in the direction of only two styles with different paint schemes will not be the future of Drag Racing. He stated it perfectly that the heart and sole of Drag Racing would be lost.

Jack Matyas 04-04-2010 12:44 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rapid1055 (Post 179886)
Also, My hope is that Bruce Noland's predictions that we might be headed in the direction of only two styles with different paint schemes will not be the future of Drag Racing. He stated it perfectly that the heart and sole of Drag Racing would be lost.

As long as there are people like myself and the Bruce Noland's of the world who may not agree on the validity of the CJ's and DP's but the common ground is the "Heart and Soul of Drag Racing " it will survive .............Most racers are not ready to quit because of the sheer existance of these new cars .

Pvt Parts 04-04-2010 01:22 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty (Post 179657)
I agree Jeff. If not let us pick a stock class where all these cars can run against each other with acceptable replacement parts. We should do this in SS as well. I called for it 4 years ago and have been pushing for it every since. There is no reason for these cars to be exempted for no good reason.

It would also include, Stage II Buicks, RA-V Pontiacs, L88 Corverttes, Hemi cars, 421SD cars with heads like the Hemi guys get as replacements, Tunnel Port Fords, SOHC Fords, AMC dual quad 390s, High Port 427 Ford and all the factory "RACE" cars.

However, allowing some run and other not because of race gerrymandering is unacceptable.


Yes that's the only "fair" way to apply the crate motor rule to everyone equally. Most if not all of the cars you mentioned were built outside the factory production line. And don't forget Conway's Corvette.

LSP 04-04-2010 05:50 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Scott, where did your SS/A 67 L88 Vette end up? - saw the car run at Ennis in the late 80's, nice piece.

Lynn A McCarty 04-04-2010 06:33 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pvt Parts (Post 179903)
Yes that's the only "fair" way to apply the crate motor rule to everyone equally. Most if not all of the cars you mentioned were built outside the factory production line. And don't forget Conway's Corvette.

Thanks Scott,

I had also proposed to NHRA that a GT/AH class be created at 6.0 where we can run those type engines in GT cars. The GTAA cars now at 8.0 for the high horsepower cars running 1000lbs heavier just doesnt wash. NHRA changed GT cars forever when they allowed the 2670lb car. Especially when the changed the wording on the 2500lb minimum.

Wouldnt a 428 Tunnel port Grand AM against a 427 Cobalt heads up at 6.0 be cool?

X-TECH MAN 04-04-2010 07:27 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
[QUOTE=Lynn A McCarty;



Wouldnt a 428 Tunnel port Grand AM against a 427 Cobalt heads up at 6.0 be cool?[/QUOTE]

But Lynn.....That would steal the spot light from the multi millionaires Hemi 'Cudas and Darts. Ya cant have that with all the $$$$ Chrysler dumps into NHRA.

bill dedman 04-04-2010 11:07 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Someone proposed the '49 Hudson Hornet....

CAN'T DO THAT!! NO HUDSON HORNETS WE'RE BUILT 'TIL 1951!!!!

Uh, wait a minute.... strike that. I forgot the new rules; it's "crate motor" time in NHRA Stock!!!

Sorry; I get so confused....

Alex Polewik 04-05-2010 08:28 AM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty (Post 179965)

Wouldnt a 428 Tunnel port Grand AM against a 427 Cobalt heads up at 6.0 be cool?

No... But a Challenger Drag Pak vs a new Cobra Jet Mustang would be very cool. Current Factory cars fighting it out like the old days. To bad Pontiac is going gone/away a GTO would be cool in the mix.

I'd also like to see :

1. Fully super stock prepared 2010 CJ Mustang heads up against the fastest SS/AH(Barton/Daniels or Wescotts). Maybe there's finally going to be something new at the top??? New Mustangs already pushing 152 mph, how long did it take the hemi's to get to that level?

2.Oakes with Armstrong power vs the Big Bad Red Roush Mustang heads up in SS/DA or SS/CA. My moneys on the stang even tough I'd like to see Brian win.

3. Any new camaro drag pack option(come on GM)

4.Mopar figures a way to allow a 392 hemi with a supercharger like the Cobra Jets. Then it will really get fun...


These threads are more fun than the National Inquirer to read..thanks for all the fun over my morning coffee.

Having fun,
Alex

Jeff Teuton 04-05-2010 04:36 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Tech man, those 'multimillion darts & cudas' were devalued severly last year. Humbling is what you call it. But you know, an old Barton motor and a good car is an excellent bracket car. We did that last year. Anybody need any old SS/AH motors?

Jeff Teuton 04-05-2010 04:41 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Mopar will soon release an all aluminum block probably capable of over 1000 hp in 426 and 440 based on the current 6.1 Hemi design. Same heads as the current DP cars, big one barrel throttle body, maybe something for the blown crowd also. Crate motors & parts. But you know how those 'crate motors' move around from car to car.

Chad Rhodes 04-05-2010 04:41 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty (Post 179965)
Thanks Scott,

I had also proposed to NHRA that a GT/AH class be created at 6.0 where we can run those type engines in GT cars. The GTAA cars now at 8.0 for the high horsepower cars running 1000lbs heavier just doesnt wash. NHRA changed GT cars forever when they allowed the 2670lb car. Especially when the changed the wording on the 2500lb minimum.

Wouldnt a 428 Tunnel port Grand AM against a 427 Cobalt heads up at 6.0 be cool?

I'm thinking a new LS7 cobalt or cavalier

Fred Holdorf 04-05-2010 06:20 PM

Re: Proposal for Old Cars in Stock
 
Ah, Hudsons! You now have the first "Crate Motor Stocker". Ike Smith built 4 Hudson Jets (small compact car 2800#), and convinced "Farmer" it was and option, only to find that they set the firewall back 4 inches to get a 308 cu in, dual carbed motor and Hydramatic in to J/ Stock. This caused my Falcon to be uncompetitive for over two years. So you see there is precedence for whats going down. A couple of "names" had them and did real well with them, also. Ah, history.
Fred

P.S. I forgot to add this was about 1963/1964 or so.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.