CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=28631)

Dgal 09-28-2010 06:59 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213612)
I probably got my information from the same place that told you there were going to be new classes next year.

I highly doubt that.

Don

Ed Wright 09-28-2010 08:14 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213573)
so you're saying Bruce and Danny did their best?

Putting words in my mouth Chad? :-)

Just seems like knowlgeble engine builders would have been consulted when purpose built combos are submitted.

Bruce Noland 09-28-2010 08:36 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
The following paragraph is from a letter that was sent to me on Jan. 30, 2009.

"It has always been NHRA's policy to use the specification produced by the manufacturer (via the Official NHRA Technical Information Form) to add a vehicle combination to the NHRA Class Guide and Blue Print Specifications. Also please keep in mind that NHRA has policies and procedures to correct any disparities the future may bring."

Signed by: Glen Gray and Danny Gracia

JHeath 09-28-2010 09:46 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Bruce, that letter is nearly two years old, but I guess if either the CJ or Drag Pac were manufactured by GM, your letter would be insignificant, and NOBODY would hear about it

Bruce Noland 09-28-2010 10:30 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JHeath (Post 213642)
Bruce, that letter is nearly two years old, but I guess if either the CJ or Drag Pac were manufactured by GM, your letter would be insignificant, and NOBODY would hear about it

The above mentioned letter was in response to my questions about the CJ but it also applied to all OEM's, even GM. You should actually read the post before stumbling out here to stir the pot with your little stick.

Greg Hill 09-29-2010 08:46 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JHeath (Post 213642)
Bruce, that letter is nearly two years old, but I guess if either the CJ or Drag Pac were manufactured by GM, your letter would be insignificant, and NOBODY would hear about it

Why do you people think this is about brands? These cars are bogus and everyone on this forum knows it. Ask my buddy Verne Buchannon who is a long time Ford racer what he thinks about them. These cars should not be in the traditional stock classes no matter what car companies pu them out there.

Dgal 09-29-2010 09:02 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Hill (Post 213704)
Why do you people think this is about brands? These cars are bogus and everyone on this forum knows it. Ask my buddy Verne Buchannon who is a long time Ford racer what he thinks about them. These cars should not be in the traditional stock classes no matter what car companies pu them out there.

Because that is all they have. The supporters have to play "what if" games to post any form of argument. They won't let facts get in the way of a good discussion.

Don

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 09:09 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgal (Post 213707)
Because that is all they have. The supporters have to play "what if" games to post any form of argument. They won't let facts get in the way of a good discussion.

Don

agreed. I no more want to race an LS7 powered camaro or a blown vette heads up than I do a challenger DP or a CJ mustang. I do think it would be cool to see the big three go after each other, but not at the expense of the rest of stock eliminator.

Dgal 09-29-2010 09:54 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213709)
agreed. I no more want to race an LS7 powered camaro or a blown vette heads up than I do a challenger DP or a CJ mustang. I do think it would be cool to see the big three go after each other, but not at the expense of the rest of stock eliminator.

Chad,

Do you know the main reason that you won't see too many if any of the new Camaros as Stockers or SS? They are so freaking wide you can't get them in the stackers or enclosed trailers that many racers own. They may be open trailer only cars which isn't such a bad deal, IMHO.

Don

Harry 6674 09-29-2010 10:38 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
The nose on the camaros resemble a german half-track. Sorry.

dwydendorf 09-29-2010 10:49 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgal (Post 213707)
Because that is all they have. The supporters have to play "what if" games to post any form of argument. They won't let facts get in the way of a good discussion.

Don

Well here is something to think about. In say 1970, when the 68 1/2 and 69 Mustang 428 Cobra Jets and 69 396 and 427 Camaros were only a year or two old, how many of you would have defended a 1930 model T being obsoleted by the new Mustangs and Camaros? You are talking about 40 year old cars being obsoleted by new technology. Don't you think after 40 years someone could come up with something better?

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 10:56 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgal (Post 213718)
Chad,

Do you know the main reason that you won't see too many if any of the new Camaros as Stockers or SS? They are so freaking wide you can't get them in the stackers or enclosed trailers that many racers own. They may be open trailer only cars which isn't such a bad deal, IMHO.

Don

i see a whole new market for liftgate-upper deck stackers

Bruce Noland 09-29-2010 10:56 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213730)
Well here is something to think about. In say 1970, when the 68 1/2 and 69 Mustang 428 Cobra Jets and 69 396 and 427 Camaros were only a year or two old, how many of you would have defended a 1930 model T being obsoleted by the new Mustangs and Camaros? You are talking about 40 year old cars being obsoleted by new technology. Don't you think after 40 years someone could come up with something better?

1930 Model T Stockers? Were they in the class guides?

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 10:58 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213730)
Well here is something to think about. In say 1970, when the 68 1/2 and 69 Mustang 428 Cobra Jets and 69 396 and 427 Camaros were only a year or two old, how many of you would have defended a 1930 model T being obsoleted by the new Mustangs and Camaros? You are talking about 40 year old cars being obsoleted by new technology. Don't you think after 40 years someone could come up with something better?

if the new cars carried the same HP factor as the old model T and had to race them heads up, then yes I would. However that's a straw man/apples and oranges comparison that's a joke. No one is arguing that the technology isn't better, but the hp factors are dishonest at best.

dwydendorf 09-29-2010 11:27 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213735)
if the new cars carried the same HP factor as the old model T and had to race them heads up, then yes I would. However that's a straw man/apples and oranges comparison that's a joke. No one is arguing that the technology isn't better, but the hp factors are dishonest at best.

The 69 428 cj was rated at 335hp which was underfactored at the time along with the 69 255 hp 350 and the 67-69 290 hp z-28 Camaro when they came out. How is it any different today?

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 11:32 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213738)
The 69 428 cj was rated at 335hp which was underfactored at the time along with the 69 255 hp 350 and the 67-69 290 hp z-28 Camaro when they came out. How is it any different today?

you could buy one on the showroom floor and drive it home????? there's a big start. If you want to "buy one and drive it home" from ford, the closest you can get ( which is a mere .030 in cam lift different) is a GT500 rated at 540.

Mike Carr 09-29-2010 11:50 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213739)
you could buy one on the showroom floor and drive it home????? there's a big start. If you want to "buy one and drive it home" from ford, the closest you can get ( which is a mere .030 in cam lift different) is a GT500 rated at 540.

Not to mention the older combinations mentioned weren't almost hundred horsepower soft like the modern ones...

A/SA Fairlane 09-29-2010 12:05 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213739)
you could buy one on the showroom floor and drive it home????? there's a big start. If you want to "buy one and drive it home" from ford, the closest you can get ( which is a mere .030 in cam lift different) is a GT500 rated at 540.



The 08 Shelby is only 500 hp which is a good place to start for the CJ IMO. Fezell could have the sticks there by the end of next year the way he is running. As for the automatics I think the retired OLD blue ford from NY could out run any one of them for the right $$$, but I didn't race stock for very long and haven't raced it in over 10 years so my opion doesn't really matter

D. French out of $$ long b4 the new cars came along LOL

Dgal 09-29-2010 12:14 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by A/SA Fairlane (Post 213745)
D. French out of $$ long b4 the new cars came along LOL


Did you have to rub it in? :D

Don

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 12:14 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by A/SA Fairlane (Post 213745)
The 08 Shelby is only 500 hp which is a good place to start for the CJ IMO. Fezell could have the sticks there by the end of next year the way he is running. As for the automatics I think the retired OLD blue ford from NY could out run any one of them for the right $$$, but I didn't race stock for very long and haven't raced it in over 10 years so my opion doesn't really matter

D. French out of $$ long b4 the new cars came along LOL

the 2010 is rated at 540, and the NHRA factor is 435

A/SA Fairlane 09-29-2010 12:27 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213748)
the 2010 is rated at 540, and the NHRA factor is 435

So what is your point?:confused: The 08 is rated @ 500 and the NHRA factor for a stick is 449 (I think) Fezell's 08 gets it hit so often I can't keep it straight.

D. French

Ed Wright 09-29-2010 12:32 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgal (Post 213718)
Chad,

Do you know the main reason that you won't see too many if any of the new Camaros as Stockers or SS? They are so freaking wide you can't get them in the stackers or enclosed trailers that many racers own. They may be open trailer only cars which isn't such a bad deal, IMHO.

Don

Well, the hp ratings are also honest.

Chad said: the 2010 is rated at 540, and the NHRA factor is 435

That makes no sense at all.

dwydendorf 09-29-2010 12:38 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213739)
you could buy one on the showroom floor and drive it home????? there's a big start. If you want to "buy one and drive it home" from ford, the closest you can get ( which is a mere .030 in cam lift different) is a GT500 rated at 540.

Well you can thank our wonderful government for allowing the Car Manufacturers the chance to make these cars showroom available. With the government regulations the car companies have to deal with it is a wonder they were able to do what they did. Don't blame NHRA,Ford and Chrysler, blame the U.S. Government for not making these cars showroom available and driveable on the street.

junior barns 09-29-2010 12:40 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by A/SA Fairlane (Post 213753)
So what is your point?:confused: The 08 is rated @ 500 and the NHRA factor for a stick is 449 (I think) Fezell's 08 gets it hit so often I can't keep it straight.

D. French

The point is:

IT'S SO FAR UNDERFACTORED IT IS RIDICULOUS!!!

BTW, There are NO older cars that can run with these new cars at there current HP factors PERIOD!!!

Chad Rhodes 09-29-2010 01:12 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213756)
Well you can thank our wonderful government for allowing the Car Manufacturers the chance to make these cars showroom available. With the government regulations the car companies have to deal with it is a wonder they were able to do what they did. Don't blame NHRA,Ford and Chrysler, blame the U.S. Government for not making these cars showroom available and driveable on the street.

Ford does make a street legal one, its rated at 540 HP. RACE THAT SON OF A BITCH!!!! ohh yea, its a SS/A only car and wouldn't be able to run roughshod over the rest of the class. Of course, that is, if it was even in the guide.

Ed Wright 09-29-2010 04:41 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Amen!

You have such a way with words.

Barnstorm 09-29-2010 09:12 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Do like we did...dial the number...cut a lite..Rick didn't crush the index but won the event.

Ed Wright 09-29-2010 09:27 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
If your happy bracket racing & don't have a heads up that will work.

dwydendorf 09-30-2010 09:22 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 213762)
Ford does make a street legal one, its rated at 540 HP. RACE THAT SON OF A BITCH!!!! ohh yea, its a SS/A only car and wouldn't be able to run roughshod over the rest of the class. Of course, that is, if it was even in the guide.

I would be happy to race a stock Shelby just as soon as all the guys racing the old cars give up the parts that don't make their cars original production showroom available. These include Siamese bore replacement blocks, superceded cylinder heads, cams, intake manifolds, carburators, Lightweight transmissions , carbon fiber hoods in place of fiberglass, and rear axles in place of what came from the factory. Many of these items affect the original horsepower rating and don't make it fair for the people that have to race the oem parts because there were none available for their combinations. How many 1963 to 2010 Corvettes were built from the factory without the swing arm axles? None! Well guess what your car isn't a showroom available piece either. If you say that NHRA allows us to do that, well guess what, NHRA has approved the Drag Pak and Cobra Jets also.

X-TECH MAN 09-30-2010 09:36 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwydendorf (Post 213892)
How many 1963 to 2010 Corvettes were built from the factory without the swing arm axles?.

The same number as Dodge DP's that came from the factory with a rear end of any kind !

Bruce Noland 09-30-2010 09:57 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 213897)
The same number as Dodge DP's that came from the factory with a rear end of any kind !

This is a safety change that made some sense because the IRS was not designed for drag racing. The 1/8" fiberglass floors in these cars do not offer any protection when one of these rears comes apart. Heard of one racer who had his elbow chewed off.

X-TECH MAN 09-30-2010 10:16 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 213900)
This is a safety change that made some sense because the IRS was not designed for drag racing. The 1/8" fiberglass floors in these cars do not offer any protection when one of these rears comes apart. Heard of one racer who had his elbow chewed off.

This safety change is well know but he wanted to know how many Corvettes came from the factory with swing axles vs solid rears. At least the Corvette could run under its own power and thats more than can be said about the Dodge DP's that came with a trailer axle and I believe the transmission did not have any internal parts either. What a joke !

GUMP 09-30-2010 10:31 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 213905)
This safety change is well know but he wanted to know how many Corvettes came from the factory with swing axles vs solid rears. At least the Corvette could run under its own power and thats more than can be said about the Dodge DP's that came with a trailer axle and I believe the transmission did not have any internal parts either. What a joke !

The days of taking a showroom car and running Stock are long gone. Two things have happened. First, the Feds have added so many safety and fuel economy requirements to the new cars that there is a huge amount of stuff that can now be legally removed. Second, the racers have pushed hard for years to allow all these things to be removed.

I know that you love to hate these cars, but they do make sense. Both cars fit the current rules. Both pass tech (when properly prepared). All the factories prepared cars in the same manner back in the sixties too. You just weren't allowed to change as much back then.

The power plants are where the arguments should really be focused.

GUMP 09-30-2010 10:33 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 213897)
The same number as Dodge DP's that came from the factory with a rear end of any kind !

I believe that is what he was pointing out! What's good for the goose.......

Bruce Noland 09-30-2010 10:46 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 213905)
This safety change is well know but he wanted to know how many Corvettes came from the factory with swing axles vs solid rears. At least the Corvette could run under its own power and thats more than can be said about the Dodge DP's that came with a trailer axle and I believe the transmission did not have any internal parts either. What a joke !

Seems to me that he knew that as well. Maybe he didn't. But we agree.

Dgal 09-30-2010 10:54 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 213909)
I know that you love to hate these cars, but they do make sense. Both cars fit the current rules. Both pass tech (when properly prepared). All the factories prepared cars in the same manner back in the sixties too. You just weren't allowed to change as much back then.

The power plants are where the arguments should really be focused.

Are you serious? The power plants have been the focus of the arguments. It was dwydenorf that was bringing up the rear ends. The critics of these factory race cars have been focusing on the power plants.

Speaking of power plants, how many 5.7 Drag Paks have been produced by the factory? How many 5.9 Drag Paks have been produced by the factory? If there weren't at least 50 then they don't meet the rules. I think there were at least 50 of the 6.1 to weakly meet that part of the rules.

Either way, why is it so hard for anyone to understand that these cars should stay in stock, but in their own class? This is such a simple solution and isn't a loss for one single competitor. I take that back. It is a loss for the competitor that feels an unlevel playing field is their ticket to the next round. There is no other justification.

Don

Ed Wright 09-30-2010 11:30 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
The bodus hp ratings of the power plants ARE the focus of the arguments.

Peter Ash 09-30-2010 11:36 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 213905)
This safety change is well know but he wanted to know how many Corvettes came from the factory with swing axles vs solid rears. At least the Corvette could run under its own power and thats more than can be said about the Dodge DP's that came with a trailer axle and I believe the transmission did not have any internal parts either. What a joke !

The transmissions are real and serviceable. And the rearend has the IRS assembly without the guts.

Dgal 09-30-2010 11:36 AM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
Gump,

I will save you the trouble because I found what I was looking for. According to Jeff Teuton who I would trust knows about as much about these cars as anyone the production figures are.

6.1 90 units
5.7 7 units
5.9 3 units

Now tell me how the 5.7 and the 5.9 engine combos meet the NHRA rule book?

Reserved for 1960 or new model-year factory-production automobiles and some sports cars. Classified per NHRA performance rating as listed in the Official NHRA Stock Car Classification Guide. Only those cars listed in the guide are eligible for competition. All cars in Stock classes must be factory-production assembled, showroom available, and in the hands of the general public. A minimum 500 units of a particular body style must be produced.

OEM may apply for inclusion of any special production runs into the Official NHRA Stock Car Classification Guide. Special run must include a minimum of 50 units of an already accepted body style, need not be showroom available. Applications evaluated on an individual basis. Acceptance will not imply precedent.


Ok, there are a couple of glaring issues. One that jumps out is All cars in Stock classes must be factory-production assembled. The Drag Paks come partially assembled. The racer must complete the car.

The second paragraph trumps the "showroom available and in the hands of the general public." But the second paragraph also states that there must be a minimum of 50 units. Three 5.9 and seven 5.7 are a long ways from 50. You cannot combine them to get there.

These don't meet the NHRAs own rule book for Stock classification and the 6.1 doesn't since it is partially assembled. They are factory race cars that should be in their own class along with the Cobra Jets. Keep them in stock and I would be glad to dial against them.

Don



Peter Ash 09-30-2010 12:10 PM

Re: What would you do with the current CJ and DP car situation?
 
First off:

This whole thread is filled by 10 negative people repeating their beliefs only!

Could they be called "Proffessional Whiners"

Secondly - You have to redefine "factory assembled". In todays world the factories are spread across continents, with many subassembly and contract assembly plants. Detroit is an assembly plant now , not a manufacturer's plant

Regarding the 5.7 and 5.9 Drag Paks, the guide you quote for the 50 car specialty run says "body style", Not "engine combination"

Read your own post's with your interpretations and you get what you want.

Have a nice day!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.