Re: Rules
I'd be OK with that. Just can't show either.
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
Joey D - Please put your phone back on the hook .......i'm tired of hitting redial . |
Re: Rules
Jeff Lee posted:
Lets start with that...seat belts. If it's SFI approved once, it's SFI & NHRA approved forever (or until an obvious problem)! I would count sun faded as a problem. I've replaced frickin' belts that had dozens of passes on them and they sat in my cool garage the remaining times. And I've always been a proponent of "traditional" aluminum roller rockers for Stockers. That or take away any modified lifters. That means NO MODIFICATIONS. Take your pick. I dont think I go along with you idea about belts. Good properly working seat belts played a part in saving me and I was told bad belts and plastic seats played a part in us loosing Lee Shepherd. Seat belts are abused by more than just the sunshine. They should be removed and checked. I don't agree with some of the prices charged to recert. The rocker arm/lifter deal I agree with. |
Re: Rules
Adger, didn't Lee's helmet come off?
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
The car they were using was the Alston test mule. OSBI confiscated all the wreckage and equipment for their study of the accident. OSBI is like the Oklahoma version of the NTSB and FBI combined. The story I got was the belts were chafed on the 2 layer plastic seat, remember them, from all the ins and outs of the test car and the belt broke on impact. It was all because the crosswind pulled him off track. His head hit the cage bar across the windshield and he had an open faced helmet on. Lee raced at my tracks quite a lot and I even opened the track for some testing. He was not the type guy to make a pass without the belts on or his chin strap fastened. He was a person of routine, right down to unloading his car and sitting on his tailgate eating his brown bagged sandwich. Check out this link, it shows helmet & intensity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BShCWWe8VPc
Why do you think SFI came out with the belt rules after that and a couple other incidents with the plastic seats? Also if you see those seats now the belt openings are cut with a milling tool, not a hot knife that leaves sharp edges. It is a shame we have to loose people to further the safety rules. It is also a shame we have racers that are more concerned with the money and the inconvenience the rules cause than their purpose of safety. |
Re: Rules
What tracks did you have, Adger?
|
Re: Rules
Adger, you missed my point that if a visual inspection revealed a problem, even sun discoloration, then they need to be replaced.
That could mean replacing every race if there is something wrong! A brand new set of belts, if improperly installed, will not be fully functional and are subject to failure. A set of belts that look as good as new, are as good as new in my opinion. Anything less, needs a replacement set. I may be wrong but I think belts for fighter planes and sprint cars are not replaced on a calendar, only on poor quality. |
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
Here's what I'd like to see....scale, fuel check 1st pass.... then the only way you go back is if you go quicker or have a heads-up run! Would speed things up so much!
|
Re: Rules
ED, every time I set a record (60,70,80) I went to the barn..............:confused:
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
here's what i would like to see:
tech once a year scale, fuel once a race heads up to scale and fuel everone gets torn down once check for driveshaft (alum) once batterys check once a year spools and axles check once brake pedal check once (pull back on it) do spot check in stagging lanes once a race if got cheating out for 2 years any body saids anything about nhra out for life and off this board |
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
yea ed your gone
don't have to listen to your bull***t no more by the way i am joking don"t ask me why i like you and billy must have lost my **** mind |
Re: Rules
Ed, do not worry, Vic is always in some kind of unusual mood. At Bradenton last year he had a real bad attitude about the weather, go figure, it was only 48 degrees. If it was'nt for Billy, I believe he was going back up to his winter wonderland where it was cooler.
RULE CHANGE: Scales and fuel if liked class cars compete. The fuel that I want to buy, not the high priced crap I have to run. Qualify the fuel cars at night to give sportsman more time runs. No more eliminations at 8:00 AM and again at 10:00 PM. Ron Ortiz U/SA change, change, change |
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
you can set an ihra record with a previously sealed mtr. saw this happen, tech man turned to me and stated, ( oh we tore this one down @ previous race.) when i tried the same thing , got told ( how do we know you didnt mix up the colors and paint it yourself) HMMMMMM i guess i didnt have enough of a southern drawl, is what i was later told.
|
Re: Rules
When and where did you tear down and set the first record, and when and where did you have a problem setting another record with your sealed motor in the same season?
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
I'd like to see eliminations ladders set up so that all scheduled bye runs take place in the first round.
Currently, a driver can win a quarterfinal race in certain-sized fields and go straight to the final. A semi-final win can be worth thousands of dollars in purse money and contingencies, plus bonus points, and a free time trial or a parts saving easy pass. Why not make a driver work to advance instead? It also cheats spectators to see late-round bye runs instead of meaningful races. Low qualifiers are actually being penalized now, because their 'free pass' in an odd-sized field only gets them to the second round, which usually doesn't earn them anything but points. The drivers down the ladder are the ones benefiting from the more meaningful byes as the race progresses. |
Re: Rules
What do you do with a 65-car field?
|
Re: Rules
All bye runs can't be in the first round. What do you do with an odd number of round winners?
|
Re: Rules
Shoot them?
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
Well, that's obvious. You give the top 63 qualifiers a bye and the bottom 2 qualifiers have to race. Then you have a nice even 64 cars left for round two. :) -Toby |
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You have to remember that in order to eliminate a 65 car field you are in effect going to need a 128 car ladder with 63 empty slots in it. Current practice is to manipulate the ladder into multiple "full pods" and "empty pods" to compensate for the scheduled odd car byes. If you look at the ladders at NHRA.com, you'll see that many ladders set up this way are 1/4 empty space. My plan takes all the mid-race empty pairings and competition byes and moves them to the first round. Current format: 65>33>17>09>5>3>2 - - - Six rounds of eliminations to reach final. Seven wins needed for title. - - - 9.2% (6/65) of starters have shot at title with only six wins needed Proposed format: 65>64>32>16>8>4>2 - - - Six rounds of eliminations to reach final. Seven wins needed for title. - - - 96.9% (63/65) of starters have shot at title with only six wins needed. |
Re: Rules
I agree with Toby about the cylinder heads. The way the rules are interpreted now is expensive bullsh*t.
Chris Barnes Wagons of Steel Stock 6621 |
Re: Rules
Quote:
Semi 500x1=500 Rd5 450x3=1350 Rd4 400x7=2800 Rd3 300x15=4500 Total of $9150 saved by NHRA |
Re: Rules
In addition, the race would take a lot longer to run. 63 bye runs in a race instead of 6. Multiply that track time by 5-10 classes, and you're looking at almost another entire day to run an event.
|
Re: Rules
Quote:
|
Re: Rules
I can only hope that the season gets here fast enough.I love beating up on NHRA when It seems they need it.But this discussion is getting ridiculous.Next some of you will be accusing them of trying to manipulate the fields so they get the maximim amount of bye runs.Let's beat them up on real issues.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.