Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
A lot of things appear safe, when everything goes well. The problem with racing is that fairly often, everything doesn't go well. just because you can get away with something for a while, doesn't mean it is relatively safe, nor does it mean that it is a good idea. The law of averages WILL eventually catch up to you, and the result usually is not pretty. I'd prefer not to be the one taken along for the ride when it catches up with whoever happens to be the next victim. I figure it'd cost well over $50K to replace any car we race, if we did all the work ourselves, closer to $100K if we farmed it out. The drivers are all married with families, those are a little more difficult to replace. If we wanted to be racing the small tire outlaw classes, we'd build small tire outlaw cars. There's a reason we race Stock and Super Stock. |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
My proposal creates new classes, nothing more, as a natural resting place for the cars to go. I'm not 'putting the new cars there', but letting them have a place to go instead of heavy. With that availability I think the movement would speed up as opposed to 1000' ft racing. But remember the heads up last year in AA/SA between DeFrank and Stahl, both in the 9.70's, both old cars, so those guys ain't goin away easy anyway.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Hell, I hit the wall in Houston. Just goes to show what driver error can do at any speed. The car was fine. There is no cure for driver error, plum stupidity, senior moments and the such. I tried beer, but that didn't work and neither did a martini or two. Anybody got a cure?
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
jeff, here are my concerns
if they are still part of stock then i will be racing cars going 150 mph ? if they seperate you into a new class SFX (stock factory experimental) then lets get it done ... it will be too cool ! > and SFX rules could include 10.5 tires and functional chutes ! jack of course you wont become a pro-sportsman snob and rescind your "my cooler is your cooler" racing philosophy once you become the SFX kingpin will you ??? |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
This reminds me of the story of how to boil a frog. The story is if you place a frog into boiling water he will just jump out, however if you warm it slowly he will eventually boil to death.
NHRA started the water boiling by allowing Super Stock cars into stock. So now they want new stock classes, next it's bigger tires, 4 link suspensions, factory installed trans brakes, factory installed delay boxes, eliminate the slower cars because it's unsafe to pass a 90mph car at 150 plus. I think I can feel the water getting hotter. |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Richard all cars that are drive by wire {Ford} can have traction control.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
i will let you in on a little insight on jeff's new car it will have a one of a kind new clutch made by a cajun down in dulac la by a man named herman bodwin. it is so advanced this clutch was used in a skiff by herman himself for r and d this clutch is so good it will add 50 hp to the new car so watch out racer's.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
http://www.fordracingparts.com/cobra...e%20Retail.pdf |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...ns_120910.html |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
With the way stockers are being built today, like MPR B&B etc, safety will not be an issue with the new cars going as fast as they are. And I would not compare them to outlaw classes where you have big inch, big horsepower cars, on small tires, running on marginal tracks. Actually, to at least the 330, the newer cars are much less violent than the older cars that are getting much higher in the air. If they are put in their own class with a lighter weight break, it shouldnt be a safety problem. When you think about how fast some of the other class cars of yesterday have ran,(like Top Stock, superstock, even modified) and compare them and how they were built, to the new cars, the new cars are safer. As far as the safety hazard on stock suspension, they are going in the 7's with it now, so I think stockers will be fine. Jeff is trying to get some input to help with the problem. I am pretty sure he is on our side on all of this.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Jeff, I'd say again that A/FX thru D/FX, with A/FX at 7.0 and D/FX at 10.0 would be a good start. I think the current ratings on the new cars will work fine at 7.0, (they'll be significantly lighter than say a ZL-1 or an L-88 forced to run at 7.5 in AA) and if you were to make the A/FX index at 10.20, that would allow the new cars to go plenty fast. They'd have to go 9.00 to go 1.20 under. That gives them 0.40 more to work with than the current index for AA which is 10.60. That would let you guys hold 4 tenths over the traditional cars.
Isn't 9 flat at over 150MPH fast enough for Stock Eliminator? |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Be ready for Stock to be revamped in 2012. Look for the upper classes in Stock to be moved to S/S. That's my prediction.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Yes, it makes a big difference. When they are allowed traction control, trans brakes(not yet but I'm just waiting), automatic shift, bigger tires(it's coming) and anything the factories and some very smart racers can imagine. The faster cars already have the advantage, that's why Biondo, the Emmons, Fletcher(until he couldn't outrun the factory cars), etc. have gone to high class cars. Any futher rule changes just makes Stock more of a Super Stock class. Sooner than you think NHRA will say why not just combine the classes, look there's really no difference between the two. Everyday the water is getting hotter.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Exactly, that's the reason it's not bracket racing.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
The absolute only interest that I have ever had in S/SS was to either get beaten (fair and square) in a heads up race, or to win (fair and square) in a heads up race. In the first senario I know that I have to do more work in order to win the next time. In the latter I know that the work and time I invested was not wasted.
Go back to class winners only run in eliminations and the winner and runner up goes thru teardown and everyone that says "its still bracket racing" will see exactly the difference. Bulls*&t hp factors excluded of course. Once upon a time, a class winner decal/trophy and a record on the wall actually meant something. The way we have allowed our sport to be watered down its now not worth the gaskets. |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
And pro stock have top fool spec...... (in case you didn't get the sarcasm) |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Umm Chad, go to your local bracket track (NHRA) and check out the ET breaks for Super and Pro. 14 second street cars race 9 second 140 mph cars every weekend all over the country and it doesn't seem to bother NHRA one bit. Don't go getting NHRA all cranked up and costing me money!
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
I don't think that we can win the battle as a safety issue. NHRA will just require all cars to meet the needed spec and allow the new cars bigger tires,special suspensions, etc. With the power that Mopar and Ford companies have we will probably lose any battle. Our choices will be run IHRA, local brackets or stay home. Well, it was fun while it lasted.
The lower class cars might not see the threat but when the new cars use parts that give them an unfair advantage just as the upper class cars are experiencing with headsup runs then everyone will realize we're being shafted also. Already the FI cars can use e-shift and we cannot. As Larry has pointed out now they can use traction control what will be next? |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Get on with the thread........Its about getting them in there own class, not what they need to be safe. If you dont feel safe fix your car so you feel safe in it, you dont need nhra to do that.
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
I assume you guys know that the under 10.00 safety rules are in effect for the cars going that fast. I think we run the Super Stock spec; 8.5 certified cage, A5 Jacket/pants, net,collar, 4B license, trans shield or the super cases, & whatever else there is. If you haven't been that fast, then you probably wouldn't know. If you haven't raced, then you probably don't know.
In Houston in AA/SA NHRA checked every item on our car, and I assume on all other stock car going in the 9's as we expected them to do. |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
I am pretty sure some of the older 9 second stockers have not had to have the 4B license, $500 worth of upgraded safety clothing and 8.50 certified cage.
I hope the rule enforcement is consistent to protect them as well as those of us with new cars Our car was also thoroughly check at Vegas by the entire Tech crew :-) peace |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
I'm pretty sure you're wrong. With the advent of the AA class, the rules were fairly strictly enforced, several people have been told they either could not race, or if they went faster than 10.00 they'd be sent home. I agree that this was not the case before AA was created. But that was because 9 second passes were quite rare on the old 11.30 index. We've been checked for every piece required to run 9's, every time, and that includes the Open races, as well as National Events and LODRS races. |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
All this controversy is what happens when the factories politic for grossly soft HP ratings for the cars (I suppose to guarantee their brand ends up in the winner's circle right off the bat), and NHRA goes for it. We would not have this debate going on if the cars had started in the right classes to begin with....
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
I guess all the cars were in the right class to start?
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
Chuck |
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.