CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=33301)

Alan Roehrich 05-10-2011 09:36 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cutta (Post 257679)
Here's some food for thought for those concerned about the safety of stock cars on 9inch tires.

There is currently a new outlaw power adder class that is receiving tons of popularity called Outlaw 8.5. These cars run on 26x8.5 slicks and run well over a 140mph in the 1/8th with over 1500hp. To my surprise, I've yet to here of any catastrophic wrecks or incidents due to the small tire. Most stock cars down make anywhere near 1500HP and if these style cars with power adders can get safely down the track, one could reason that stock cars could and should be able do the same in a more safe manner since stockers are allowed a better slick than a 26x8.5. Yes I know I have no stake in the argument, but tire technology is light years from where it used to be and are much more safe than people realize.

10.5inch slicks have been well over 200mph

12inch slicks have been well over 240mph

there's plenty of room left before any stock car reaches the 9inch slicks safety threshold in my opinion.

I've been watching the small tire cars for years. The rate of crashes compared to Stock Eliminator is astounding.

A lot of things appear safe, when everything goes well. The problem with racing is that fairly often, everything doesn't go well. just because you can get away with something for a while, doesn't mean it is relatively safe, nor does it mean that it is a good idea. The law of averages WILL eventually catch up to you, and the result usually is not pretty. I'd prefer not to be the one taken along for the ride when it catches up with whoever happens to be the next victim. I figure it'd cost well over $50K to replace any car we race, if we did all the work ourselves, closer to $100K if we farmed it out. The drivers are all married with families, those are a little more difficult to replace.

If we wanted to be racing the small tire outlaw classes, we'd build small tire outlaw cars. There's a reason we race Stock and Super Stock.

Jeff Teuton 05-10-2011 09:43 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
My proposal creates new classes, nothing more, as a natural resting place for the cars to go. I'm not 'putting the new cars there', but letting them have a place to go instead of heavy. With that availability I think the movement would speed up as opposed to 1000' ft racing. But remember the heads up last year in AA/SA between DeFrank and Stahl, both in the 9.70's, both old cars, so those guys ain't goin away easy anyway.

Alan Warman 05-10-2011 11:22 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cutta (Post 257679)
Here's some food for thought for those concerned about the safety of stock cars on 9inch tires.

There is currently a new outlaw power adder class that is receiving tons of popularity called Outlaw 8.5. These cars run on 26x8.5 slicks and run well over a 140mph in the 1/8th with over 1500hp. To my surprise, I've yet to here of any catastrophic wrecks or incidents due to the small tire. Most stock cars down make anywhere near 1500HP and if these style cars with power adders can get safely down the track, one could reason that stock cars could and should be able do the same in a more safe manner since stockers are allowed a better slick than a 26x8.5. Yes I know I have no stake in the argument, but tire technology is light years from where it used to be and are much more safe than people realize.

10.5inch slicks have been well over 200mph

12inch slicks have been well over 240mph

there's plenty of room left before any stock car reaches the 9inch slicks safety threshold in my opinion.

Go to yellowbullet.com and see how many of theses car's hit the wall each weekend. They have not taken each other out yet, but it will happen just like Alan said. And you can not even compare this type of car with a stocker. Just look under one of them no stock suspension. If you took out the MSD box they would not even make it down the track.

Jeff Teuton 05-10-2011 12:04 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Hell, I hit the wall in Houston. Just goes to show what driver error can do at any speed. The car was fine. There is no cure for driver error, plum stupidity, senior moments and the such. I tried beer, but that didn't work and neither did a martini or two. Anybody got a cure?

cutta 05-10-2011 12:14 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Warman (Post 257714)
Go to yellowbullet.com and see how many of theses car's hit the wall each weekend. They have not taken each other out yet, but it will happen just like Alan said. And you can not even compare this type of car with a stocker. Just look under one of them no stock suspension. If you took out the MSD box they would not even make it down the track.

Well I will just say this, I believe the 9inch tires that stock cars run on is enough to handle the current horsepower levels of stock cars new and old. And I am in no way trying to say that stock cars are outlaw cars, they are very different in many ways. I think that if the chassis cert is there, the cars will be plenty stable enough to run well. The gist of my statement was to indicate the tires capability.

Alan Roehrich 05-10-2011 12:23 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cutta (Post 257725)
Well I will just say this, I believe the 9inch tires that stock cars run on is enough to handle the current horsepower levels of stock cars new and old. And I am in no way trying to say that stock cars are outlaw cars, they are very different in many ways. I think that if the chassis cert is there, the cars will be plenty stable enough to run well. The gist of my statement was to indicate the tires capability.

You completely ignore the fundamentals of how Stock suspension stuff works. It has nothing to do with chassis certification, that's merely the type of cage, as well as how well it is fabricated and welded. It's the suspension and handling that will be the problem. And you might want to call Hoosier and Goodyear, and ask them if the lightweight 9" radial slick is really designed to run 150+ with a 3400#+ car, and stock type suspension.

Jack McCarthy 05-10-2011 12:33 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
jeff, here are my concerns

if they are still part of stock then i will be racing cars going 150 mph ?

if they seperate you into a new class SFX (stock factory experimental) then lets get it done ... it will be too cool !
> and SFX rules could include 10.5 tires and functional chutes !

jack

of course you wont become a pro-sportsman snob and rescind your "my cooler is your cooler" racing philosophy once you become the SFX kingpin will you ???

Richard Grant 05-10-2011 01:20 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
This reminds me of the story of how to boil a frog. The story is if you place a frog into boiling water he will just jump out, however if you warm it slowly he will eventually boil to death.
NHRA started the water boiling by allowing Super Stock cars into stock. So now they want new stock classes, next it's bigger tires, 4 link suspensions, factory installed trans brakes, factory installed delay boxes, eliminate the slower cars because it's unsafe to pass a 90mph car at 150 plus. I think I can feel the water getting hotter.

Larry Hill 05-10-2011 01:46 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Richard all cars that are drive by wire {Ford} can have traction control.

junior barns 05-10-2011 02:11 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Hill (Post 257749)
Richard all cars that are drive by wire {Ford} can have traction control.

Oh Larry, there you go again!!

sammy pizzolato 05-10-2011 02:45 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
i will let you in on a little insight on jeff's new car it will have a one of a kind new clutch made by a cajun down in dulac la by a man named herman bodwin. it is so advanced this clutch was used in a skiff by herman himself for r and d this clutch is so good it will add 50 hp to the new car so watch out racer's.

NWDragracing 05-10-2011 03:03 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 257728)
You completely ignore the fundamentals of how Stock suspension stuff works. It has nothing to do with chassis certification, that's merely the type of cage, as well as how well it is fabricated and welded. It's the suspension and handling that will be the problem. And you might want to call Hoosier and Goodyear, and ask them if the lightweight 9" radial slick is really designed to run 150+ with a 3400#+ car, and stock type suspension.

According to the Goodyear engineer, the Cobra Jet cars can run those speeds and weight with the supplied Goodyear drag tire. They were designed and tested for their application and it even has a specific designation, "DR".

http://www.fordracingparts.com/cobra...e%20Retail.pdf

Chad Rhodes 05-10-2011 03:05 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NWDragracing (Post 257764)
According to the Goodyear engineer, the Cobra Jet cars can run those speeds and weight with the supplied Goodyear drag tire. They were designed and tested for their application and it even has a specific designation, "DR".

http://www.fordracingparts.com/cobra...e%20Retail.pdf

wow really, so this "DR" means drag racing? It's about time a tire manufacturer stepped up and built a tire specifically for drag racing, now I can quit using those recapped trailer tires

NWDragracing 05-10-2011 03:10 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 257766)
wow really, so this "DR" means drag racing? It's about time a tire manufacturer stepped up and built a tire specifically for drag racing, now I can quit using those recapped trailer tires

That was my same thought during our discussion. If you look at the link below, the tire also has the Cobra Jet Snake symbol.

http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...ns_120910.html

Chad Rhodes 05-10-2011 04:35 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NWDragracing (Post 257768)
That was my same thought during our discussion. If you look at the link below, the tire also has the Cobra Jet Snake symbol.

http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...ns_120910.html

nothing more than a marketing ploy i am sure

K Stubbs 05-10-2011 08:19 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
With the way stockers are being built today, like MPR B&B etc, safety will not be an issue with the new cars going as fast as they are. And I would not compare them to outlaw classes where you have big inch, big horsepower cars, on small tires, running on marginal tracks. Actually, to at least the 330, the newer cars are much less violent than the older cars that are getting much higher in the air. If they are put in their own class with a lighter weight break, it shouldnt be a safety problem. When you think about how fast some of the other class cars of yesterday have ran,(like Top Stock, superstock, even modified) and compare them and how they were built, to the new cars, the new cars are safer. As far as the safety hazard on stock suspension, they are going in the 7's with it now, so I think stockers will be fine. Jeff is trying to get some input to help with the problem. I am pretty sure he is on our side on all of this.

Chad Rhodes 05-10-2011 08:59 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Stubbs (Post 257816)
With the way stockers are being built today, like MPR B&B etc, safety will not be an issue with the new cars going as fast as they are. And I would not compare them to outlaw classes where you have big inch, big horsepower cars, on small tires, running on marginal tracks. Actually, to at least the 330, the newer cars are much less violent than the older cars that are getting much higher in the air. If they are put in their own class with a lighter weight break, it shouldnt be a safety problem. When you think about how fast some of the other class cars of yesterday have ran,(like Top Stock, superstock, even modified) and compare them and how they were built, to the new cars, the new cars are safer. As far as the safety hazard on stock suspension, they are going in the 7's with it now, so I think stockers will be fine. Jeff is trying to get some input to help with the problem. I am pretty sure he is on our side on all of this.

the only issue I see is the vast difference from a fast A/FX car to a slow V/S car. I thin it might be time for all stockers to have the same safety specs

Alan Roehrich 05-10-2011 09:00 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NWDragracing (Post 257768)
That was my same thought during our discussion. If you look at the link below, the tire also has the Cobra Jet Snake symbol.

http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...ns_120910.html

The same exact tire is made for Chrysler, with a logo for them on it. And then they make the same tire with no special logo. I can tell you that the design changes were to improve consistency, and contact patch on the starting line. I talked to the guy at Goodyear in charge of the program. He made no mention of any change for improved handling at 150MPH+.

Ed Fernandez 05-10-2011 09:08 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 257826)
the only issue I see is the vast difference from a fast A/FX car to a slow V/S car. I thin it might be time for all stockers to have the same safety specs

No problem,they'll just legislate all of us slow guys (N and down)out.What the hell,there aren't many of us,we don't spend a ton of money on parts and chassis shops and we take to long to get to the stripe.That interferes with the TV time for the pros.

Alan Roehrich 05-10-2011 09:09 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Jeff, I'd say again that A/FX thru D/FX, with A/FX at 7.0 and D/FX at 10.0 would be a good start. I think the current ratings on the new cars will work fine at 7.0, (they'll be significantly lighter than say a ZL-1 or an L-88 forced to run at 7.5 in AA) and if you were to make the A/FX index at 10.20, that would allow the new cars to go plenty fast. They'd have to go 9.00 to go 1.20 under. That gives them 0.40 more to work with than the current index for AA which is 10.60. That would let you guys hold 4 tenths over the traditional cars.

Isn't 9 flat at over 150MPH fast enough for Stock Eliminator?

BBF67 05-11-2011 09:01 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Be ready for Stock to be revamped in 2012. Look for the upper classes in Stock to be moved to S/S. That's my prediction.

Bob Pagano 05-11-2011 09:10 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBF67 (Post 257908)
Be ready for Stock to be revamped in 2012. Look for the upper classes in Stock to be moved to S/S. That's my prediction.

If they do that they will really have a low car counts, some people with high class stockers have their cars for sale now or have already sold them.

Richard Grant 05-11-2011 10:23 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Yes, it makes a big difference. When they are allowed traction control, trans brakes(not yet but I'm just waiting), automatic shift, bigger tires(it's coming) and anything the factories and some very smart racers can imagine. The faster cars already have the advantage, that's why Biondo, the Emmons, Fletcher(until he couldn't outrun the factory cars), etc. have gone to high class cars. Any futher rule changes just makes Stock more of a Super Stock class. Sooner than you think NHRA will say why not just combine the classes, look there's really no difference between the two. Everyday the water is getting hotter.

borninamopar 05-11-2011 09:31 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Grant (Post 257693)
Don't give Ford and Mopar any ideas. I am not sure they aren't already equiped with something similiar. But then it's "stock". I guess all the rest of the stock racers can just go bracket race and leave "stock" to the high dollar factory cars.

Uh, it is bracket racing, unless it's a heads up race.

Richard Grant 05-12-2011 12:18 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Exactly, that's the reason it's not bracket racing.

SS Engine Guy 05-12-2011 03:52 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
The absolute only interest that I have ever had in S/SS was to either get beaten (fair and square) in a heads up race, or to win (fair and square) in a heads up race. In the first senario I know that I have to do more work in order to win the next time. In the latter I know that the work and time I invested was not wasted.
Go back to class winners only run in eliminations and the winner and runner up goes thru teardown and everyone that says "its still bracket racing" will see exactly the difference. Bulls*&t hp factors excluded of course.

Once upon a time, a class winner decal/trophy and a record on the wall actually meant something. The way we have allowed our sport to be watered down its now not worth the gaskets.

goinbroke2 05-12-2011 07:05 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 257826)
the only issue I see is the vast difference from a fast A/FX car to a slow V/S car. I thin it might be time for all stockers to have the same safety specs

Sure, and time for all S/SS to have pro stock spec too!



And pro stock have top fool spec......

(in case you didn't get the sarcasm)

Todd 05-12-2011 07:16 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster58 (Post 257910)
If the new cars go into there own classes what does it matter to anyone else what they weight ? The point of the new classes is to keep the old cars in the traditional classes where they can race and be competitive .

The point of the new cars is that they were designed and built to be race cars ,and go fast from the factory and they should be in there own classes . We cant change the past but be can influence the future . We now have two major car companies building factory race car . They seem to want to be involved in our sport .

Let's keep them involved , let them build the cars to go fast , keep the weight off them and let the car owners go out and have fun with there new race cars

I sold my beloved LS1 Firebirds because I want to go fast and have a new race car with a blower . I have 3 corvette's in my garage and Im a GM guy , but Im impressed with the drag pack & cobra jet cars . I bought a 2008 cobra # 49 a plan on running it as hard as I can , not because I want to kill the index but because thats what it was built for .

My cobalt is for sale now and when its gone a 2012 cobra jet will replace it for super stock . These cars are very serious race cars and I for one hope to see more factory cars coming soon especially from GM but for now Im with Ford. For the record the new cars from the factory cost less then building a new 69 camaro ZL1 or 67 shelby .

Bo Kenney

Great post Bo, you are correct about the cost factor too.

Chad Rhodes 05-12-2011 08:47 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by goinbroke2 (Post 258067)
Sure, and time for all S/SS to have pro stock spec too!



And pro stock have top fool spec......

(in case you didn't get the sarcasm)

maybe not the same but i think requiring a 6 point bar and harness in all stockers would be a great idea. Stop and think about the physics of a 3800lb cobra jet ending up in your door at over 140mph. Still don't think you need the same safety equipment?

Billy Nees 05-12-2011 09:08 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Umm Chad, go to your local bracket track (NHRA) and check out the ET breaks for Super and Pro. 14 second street cars race 9 second 140 mph cars every weekend all over the country and it doesn't seem to bother NHRA one bit. Don't go getting NHRA all cranked up and costing me money!

Richard Grant 05-12-2011 10:08 AM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
I don't think that we can win the battle as a safety issue. NHRA will just require all cars to meet the needed spec and allow the new cars bigger tires,special suspensions, etc. With the power that Mopar and Ford companies have we will probably lose any battle. Our choices will be run IHRA, local brackets or stay home. Well, it was fun while it lasted.
The lower class cars might not see the threat but when the new cars use parts that give them an unfair advantage just as the upper class cars are experiencing with headsup runs then everyone will realize we're being shafted also. Already the FI cars can use e-shift and we cannot. As Larry has pointed out now they can use traction control what will be next?

Bob Pagano 05-12-2011 12:23 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Get on with the thread........Its about getting them in there own class, not what they need to be safe. If you dont feel safe fix your car so you feel safe in it, you dont need nhra to do that.

Jeff Teuton 05-12-2011 12:27 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
I assume you guys know that the under 10.00 safety rules are in effect for the cars going that fast. I think we run the Super Stock spec; 8.5 certified cage, A5 Jacket/pants, net,collar, 4B license, trans shield or the super cases, & whatever else there is. If you haven't been that fast, then you probably wouldn't know. If you haven't raced, then you probably don't know.
In Houston in AA/SA NHRA checked every item on our car, and I assume on all other stock car going in the 9's as we expected them to do.

Andys dad 05-12-2011 01:23 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
I am pretty sure some of the older 9 second stockers have not had to have the 4B license, $500 worth of upgraded safety clothing and 8.50 certified cage.

I hope the rule enforcement is consistent to protect them as well as those of us with new cars

Our car was also thoroughly check at Vegas by the entire Tech crew


:-) peace

Alan Roehrich 05-12-2011 02:02 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andys dad (Post 258145)
I am pretty sure some of the older 9 second stockers have not had to have the 4B license, $500 worth of upgraded safety clothing and 8.50 certified cage.

I hope the rule enforcement is consistent to protect them as well as those of us with new cars

Our car was also thoroughly check at Vegas by the entire Tech crew


:-) peace


I'm pretty sure you're wrong. With the advent of the AA class, the rules were fairly strictly enforced, several people have been told they either could not race, or if they went faster than 10.00 they'd be sent home. I agree that this was not the case before AA was created. But that was because 9 second passes were quite rare on the old 11.30 index. We've been checked for every piece required to run 9's, every time, and that includes the Open races, as well as National Events and LODRS races.

Marvin Robinson 05-13-2011 02:23 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
All this controversy is what happens when the factories politic for grossly soft HP ratings for the cars (I suppose to guarantee their brand ends up in the winner's circle right off the bat), and NHRA goes for it. We would not have this debate going on if the cars had started in the right classes to begin with....

Jeff Teuton 05-13-2011 03:48 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
I guess all the cars were in the right class to start?

C and W Racing 05-13-2011 05:16 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin Robinson (Post 258336)
All this controversy is what happens when the factories politic for grossly soft HP ratings for the cars (I suppose to guarantee their brand ends up in the winner's circle right off the bat), and NHRA goes for it. We would not have this debate going on if the cars had started in the right classes to begin with....

Other than the Winternationals when the Cobra Jet's debuted, and with some breaks going his way, how many National and Divisional races have been contested and how many Cobra Jets and Drag Pacs have been in the winners circle? I'm not thinking very many. It's for the most part a bracket race and it looks to me like the vast majority of winners are in the older combo's. Class eliminations, you may have a point, but that has become a joke anyway. Even races that have class, the car count is down and half of what they do is a combo race.
Chuck

X-TECH MAN 05-13-2011 05:21 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by C and W Racing (Post 258367)
Other than the Winternationals when the Cobra Jet's debuted, and with some breaks going his way, how many National and Divisional races have been contested and how many Cobra Jets and Drag Pacs have been in the winners circle? I'm not thinking very many. It's for the most part a bracket race and it looks to me like the vast majority of winners are in the older combo's. Class eliminations, you may have a point, but that has become a joke anyway. Even races that have class, the car count is down and half of what they do is a combo race.
Chuck

But suppose you have to run one of these new under rated cars heads up in the first or second round. Your DEAD MEAT when that happens and you have NO CHANCE at winning the "bracket race".

Alan Roehrich 05-13-2011 06:18 PM

Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by C and W Racing (Post 258367)
Other than the Winternationals when the Cobra Jet's debuted, and with some breaks going his way, how many National and Divisional races have been contested and how many Cobra Jets and Drag Pacs have been in the winners circle? I'm not thinking very many. It's for the most part a bracket race and it looks to me like the vast majority of winners are in the older combo's. Class eliminations, you may have a point, but that has become a joke anyway. Even races that have class, the car count is down and half of what they do is a combo race.
Chuck

At least twice in recent history, two VERY good traditional cars with two very good drivers have had their clocks cleaned in heads up races with the new cars. Two guys who are proven winners, who were robbed of any chance to win by a bogus factor, in final eliminations.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.