CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Evan Knoll what a loser! (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=42099)

442OLDS 07-30-2012 11:50 AM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 337974)
That 20 gallon fill up you did yesterday? The one that cost you around $64?


Its about $80 in Chicago and going back up everyday!

Jim Kaekel 07-30-2012 11:58 AM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Knoll's mother ran a gas station for years, so he knew all about the govt. excise tax deal.

Crew Chief 07-30-2012 12:00 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 442OLDS (Post 337977)
Its about $80 in Chicago and going back up everyday!

Why would anyone want to live there?

Jim Wahl 07-30-2012 12:04 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crew Chief (Post 337980)
Why would anyone want to live there?

I was thinking the same thing! Jim:rolleyes:

.

Alan Roehrich 07-30-2012 01:51 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 442OLDS (Post 337977)
Its about $80 in Chicago and going back up everyday!


Welcome to local "boutique" gasoline. The Chicago area, according to the EPA, requires its own specific blend of gasoline, and only that blend may be sold in that area. Any company selling another blend without a special exception issued by the EPA could be fined millions of dollars. If they can fine a muffler shop $50K to $500K over one catalytic converter, imagine what they could do to a company over a few hundred thousand gallons of gasoline.

Harry 6674 07-30-2012 03:43 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
It looks like the makers of that particular blend of gas must have donated a fair amount of cash for Hope and Change. Why isn't that a surprise?

jwsamuel 07-31-2012 11:00 AM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry 6674 (Post 338015)
It looks like the makers of that particular blend of gas must have donated a fair amount of cash for Hope and Change. Why isn't that a surprise?

Actually, summer gas is required in most major urban areas and the requirement dates back to 1995.

Jim

Ed Wright 07-31-2012 12:30 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
That is true.

jwsamuel 07-31-2012 01:59 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Kaekel (Post 337979)
Knoll's mother ran a gas station for years, so he knew all about the govt. excise tax deal.

That wasn't a gas station. That was the world headquarters for Torco Racing Fuels.

Jim

bigshow2966 07-31-2012 02:05 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
It's "oxygenated" fuel, and it is required in the 6 county area here.

My shop is 70 miles south of my house. When I fill up down there my truck will pick up 2 mpg usually.

Ed Wright 07-31-2012 08:49 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
That E10 crap costs about 2 MPG also. More detonation prone too. Only a good deal for the corn farmers.

ss3011 07-31-2012 08:57 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Most gas in the US is E10. They dont even have to tell you that they have blended in the ethanol . The EPA is starting to push E15, but supposedly only for later model cars.

Ed Wright 07-31-2012 09:24 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Round here they do have to tell you. Stickers on the pumps. Several stations here locally are still selling straight gas. My wife's Lexus shows a consistent tank average of 21 MPG around town on straight gas. 18/19 on E10. It averages 28 highway, 25/26 on E10.
My old gas motor home, towing the race car, got 7 to 8 on straight gas. 5 to 6 on E10. 2 MPG there was also 25%. :-) in Texas the pumps said "May contain up to 10% Ethanhol") according to my mileage down there I never bought any that did not.

Lew Silverman 07-31-2012 09:40 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
All the stations around here have the same stickers "May contain up to 10% Ethanol." I don't think you could find straight gas locally.

There was a great deal of discussion about increasing the amount of Ethanol in our motor fuel, which would be bad for older vehicles not designed to run on it. It looks like that might not happen because of the damage to this years corn crop because of the drought and the resulting higher prices for everything made with corn. One of the original sales points to using the Ethanol was that it was cheaper than petroleum, but I think they may have a hard time proving that now!

Lew

Ed Wright 07-31-2012 10:08 PM

Re: Evan Knoll what a loser!
 
Hope your right Lew. That stuff sucks. Had to back the timing up for my daily driver Trans Am. It pings on E10, but some started selling straight gas again. Yippee. :-)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.