Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
So sad.
As a Ford fan and racer, it's depressing to see Ford Racing going downhill. I used to really look forward every year to the new racing parts catalog from them. Now it seems it's all wheels, axle back exhaust systems and add on spoilers. I miss seeing new hard core performance engine parts in the catalog. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Jesse Kershaw for president, get him back in there and those generic brands better take notice
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
proposal accepted because it was shown to be profitable. Remember this is 2008 just after the giant financial meltdown. A time when Ford sold nearly every brand and took out massive loans leveraging the blue oval itself under Mulally/Fields One Ford plan. You weren’t going to get anything through if it wasn’t world class leading and was profitable. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
Brian Wolfe who was at the time director of another group (powertrain or engine, can't recall the exact title) was pushing on FR for a sportsman entry into NHRA. Mike Pustelny was trying to steer the big 3 together and had a proposal he crafted. I do not believe the brass at Ford Racing took this seriously and really wanted it to go away. Wolfe pushed the FR management and they sent a representative, but it wasn't me and I wasn't included in the discussion at all. This was odd because I was the lead interface for NMRA/NMCA and because I had been pushing around a drag car powerpoint for years. There were a few meetings before I was involved at Wolfe's office so I cannot give first hand details on what happened but it's my understanding that they decided to put the GT500 in the NHRA guide and Ronzello would race it. Ford Racing would be the middle man to get Jimmy a test car to do this. Later this became the famous black CJ convertible Ronzello and Wright built as a CJ prototype. Without knowing these meetings were happening I sent Wolfe my powerpoint on the Cobra Jet to get his feedback and help. I had already worked with the Ford trademark lawyers to ensure we actually had the name. This idea of a turn-key drag car was something I had been working on since the 2003 Cobra and it drew inspiration from many sources. Evan Smith was a big help to me as was Roger Pohlman who worked at the FR warehouse and owned one of the original lightweight cars. Many others gave me insight as well but these two helped fill in many blanks so when I put together the powerpoint it had substance. But even with substance and a pretty solid business plan I wasn't getting noticed. Everyone I put it in front of brushed it aside, I thought Brian could help me edit it for executive speak because he was a drag racer and had influence. Wolfe got back to me within 15 minutes with a note essentially saying "I'm setting up a meeting with you and your boss". 5 minutes after that my boss was at my desk asking why I sent Brian Wolfe a note. But he knew the powerpoint/proposal had been made to him for at least a year so I presume he didn't want to connect the dots to the meetings he was having with Brian Wolfe, and I by accident connected those dots. To be fair the FR director at the time had a clear edict that drag racing was John Force and anything else was not to be considered so it's not a shock my boss wasn't entertaining the idea if his boss was telling him not to. The next NHRA sportman meeting was in Wolfe's office. attendees as I recall were Ronzello, Wolfe, Andy Slankard, Jamie Allison, Rob Deneweth, Larry Ferrin and myself. Prior to this meeting I think they had talked about maybe doing a car but they had no roadmap to it, my powerpoint I believe gave them a direction and basis for discussion. The CJ proposal did include a naturally aspirated 3v engine for 2008 model and a blown 5.4L for the 2010 model. In hindsight the proposal sounds crazy but at the time I believed the only way I could get a program approved was with the 3v engine because we had 50 cars worth of 3v parts in inventory or on order. Prior to the CJ, FR did the FR500S and it was a disaster. I know that's an inflammatory term to use but it's the right term. Half of the 75 FR500S's sold at a loss and they had already ordered parts for 50 more! Bodies, engines, headers, wiring, etc. all insotck or on it's way. Prior to Wolfe throwing his support behind my proposal I believed the only chance to get the car approved was to consume those parts and make a play that would allow them to not scrap those materials. The engine as propose was not a stock 3v but rather a 5.0L based off the Boss5.0 block and CNC heads. In the meeting Wolfe did call this engine out and say it was a bad/dumb idea (Brian has always been blunt with me when he thought I had a bad idea, and he's usually correct). He asked Deneweth or Ronzello the cost of the GT500 engine (which I am sure he already knew) and within a few minutes it was decided that this was the engine we would use. Andy Slankard turned to me and asked if I was ok with that because had I said no I think he would have pushed back. I concurred it was the better decision. I had to hold my poker face because inside I was grinning, this was always the engine I wanted in there but didn't think it would fly. After that it wasn't a slam dunk the car would happen but wheels were slowly turning. This was probably March or April 2008, FR was doing some work but feet were dragging. Mike Pustelny was helping us but the FR management still hadn't bought in. We were working on it enough to keep Wolfe satisfied but I suspect the plan was to slow roll it long enough that we couldn't make timing on a 2008 model and then scrap the program with a shrug and "we tried". Then in May or June Wolfe called me and told me that he was coming over as director. I was told to keep it to myself until it was officially announced. When there was an FR staff meeting called I knew what it was for so I kept my eyes on a few people to see their reactions and saw terror flash across their face when they heard he was coming. There was no more slow rolling this program, it was going to happen! I recall one manager saying something like "we're probably going to have to send the motorcoach to NMRA races now" Wolfe lit a fire, worked the whole group hard, and we delivered a car I'm very proud of to this day. There's so many stories about the hard work and some luck that brought us the success we got. And all the credit to the customers that bought the cars and raced them. Had no one bought-in where would we be? 2009 was a hard year in the performance aftermarket, many businesses were shutting down and FR made money with Wolfe keeping us on track. It might sound a bit arrogant to say but I don't think the CJ would have happened without the lucky timing of the FR500S flop making bodies and plant parts available, Wolfe's leadership coming to FR and me having a plan already in the works. Those 3 things were the lucky alignment IMO. That's not to discount the efforts by anyone else but those were major hurdles that might not have otherwise been overcome in the short time frame we had. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Jesse,
Thanks for sharing the background! It was truly a great team effort and all the right players were there to make it happen. Things like that to be involved with come along but maybe once in a lifetime. Thank you for everything you and your fellow team members did over the years. You are incredibly missed out here! Good luck on all your future success as I’m sure you will have plenty. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Jesse, we all miss you; and I certainly miss talking to you at the races.
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
While attending Mid American Shelby Meeting In Tulsa members of the Ford family were driving some of the Ford Cobra jet cars and enjoying it very much Im sure it wouldn't take much to try and get Jessie back on board with the success he has had in the program.I know all the Cobra jet owners on here would love to see him come back. Please give it some thought Jessie
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
Yes, initially the class created lots of issues while the cars were running against the older cars. Nevertheless, they have their own class, the class has grown and lots of followers. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
To Jeff. John and Bill, thank you for your kind words. I had dinner with Jimmy Ronzello and Robin Lawrence recently and I told them how much I missed the sharing of ideas and general bench racing.
Quote:
I'm sorry you feel this way. I think that's what I told you a decade ago as well when you were sending letters to Brian and I. Your dislike for the new cars is well documented, and you have a right to your opinion but I think there are facts you are choosing to ignore, positive consequences and actions that were the result of the CJ program (as well as the DP and Copo). Ford contingency for older cars would not have existed for the last decade if not for the CJ. Ford posted NHRA contingency for older cars when neither Chevy or Mopar did. Ford posted in IHRA for all Fords. We posted in NMRA & NMCA when the market was crashing and it was on the table to cut. I went to the mat to protect these programs because if they were cut it's unlikely they would ever come back. These programs were kept as part of the larger sportsman drag racing because of the CJ. When possible Ford found ways to pay racers for succeeding in a Ford. When Nick Morris had a strong season with his CJ-powered FGT Mustang we paid him the CJ payouts. When Paul Wong won a class championship we paid him the Ford payout even though some of the races that gave him points were in a brand X. When contingency sponsors were dropping off from Class payouts Ford stuck in there and even went to other sponsors requesting they stay involved. We encouraged all CJ parts suppliers to post contingency and talked several out of withdrawing. I would often write notes on the contingency check stubs congratulating and thanking racers regardless of what model year Ford they ran but those checks wouldn't exist wtihout the CJ program. Ford gave sportsman dinners for all brand sportsman racers for several years. Even when Vegas gouged us huge on pricing we kept our commitment to the racers and held the event and stayed until late in the night when the dessert was freezing. I met Ritchie Paulie at this event and spoke with him several times over the years about his vintage Ford even last year at the CJ 50th party with Don Keen. If Ford hadn't done those dinners I'm not sure NHRA would do the Indy sportsman dinner, nor do I think Skillman would do theirs. Skillman might not even be in racing without the CJ and if they weren't that's one less sponsor for David Rampy, and one less car for Joey Shipp to drive. When we promoted Indy class winners with a 2-page Dragster ad, we always included the non-CJ Ford's. We didn't have to do this and no one above my pay grade weighed in on it. Ford supported adding FS classes to separate the package cars to not hurt the older cars in heads-up races. On behalf of Ford I sought additional classes for vintage cars so we could bring in new sponsors specifically for classic race cars and offered to use my relationships with Year 1, Shelby, Scott Drake, Mother's, and any Ford officially licensed restoration hardware company to try and bring them in as sponsors/contingency sponsors for vintage classes. Unfortunately this didn't happen but the effort was there to reward lifelong Ford racers even if they weren't in the latest iron. CJ brought in new racers that contributed to the companies this community relies on. It helps having new customers spending money to keep businesses afloat and profitable, especially during down times. Ford offered X-plan pricing to all drag racers with a sanctioning body membership regardless of what they raced. I gave out about 30 per year on average. Several racers on this board took advantage of this and on a Super Duty it saves thousands (as much as $7k if memory serves)! Without an active CJ program I doubt this continues because there will be no one to administer it. Ford promoted the CJ and by extension NHRA racing whenever possible. It was all over our website, e-blasts, and marketing materials. WHen our racers won we included them on our email newsletter and on Facebook feeds. We ran an ad celebrating the 8-second club as racers broke that barrier in their Ford's. There was nothing stealth about our effort. Ford enjoyed, and as far as I know continues to have a productive working relationship with NHRA, that doesn't sound like deception to me. Losing the CJ will likely be followed by losses for all Ford racers from sponsors, to contingency, to parts availability, to NHRA rules. So when you say many of you want the CJ gone, you're also wishing less help and support for at least some of your fellow racers. As for whistle blowers I assume you are implying someone in Ford shared your view on the program and spoke with you about it. I am aware of a single individual who was vocal about his disdain for the program, he called the CJ owners the "haves". He was included on the 2010 model discussions. After that he was not part of the CJ team and was not directly involved with the program through the 2016 model, the last one I was there for. When I consulted him it was generally to get the perspective of someone with an opinion similar to yours. So while I wouldn't be surprised if you an he discussed something, I would be very surprised if during my tenure he knew details on the inner workings of the program or NHRA negotiations to share with you and I doubt anyone else from the CJ team communicated with you. The decisions around sportsman drag racing and the CJ program were done with the intention of growing the sport and community around production based racing, with Ford profiting from all ships rising. This isn't to say that in hindsight Ford and their representative (me), always did the right thing. I made mistakes and sometimes I didn't agree with the direction I was told to take. And sometimes older cars did not benefit. When you're trying to make something new and desirable by default something else becomes less desirable. And there were times sitting in the NHRA tech trailer I knew doing the right thing for Ford and the new race cars meant that older race cars would be less desirable. This was part of the job, and in racing not everyone gets a trophy. I know there were times when despite my desire to help older car racers my resources were focused on selling new cars so I'm sure there are some older car customers that felt Ford didn't do enough for them and for that I'm sorry. But there was never an agenda of maliciousness toward non-CJ's and the objectives of the program were to bring more to sportsman racing, not less. Losing the CJ will likely mean less from Ford for all Ford racers, and to a degree all sportsman racers. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Jesse, well written and spoken!
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
I don't know this Jesse Kershaw guy... but I believe we could hang out.
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Ford lost a fine representative of the company when Jesse left....
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
It was announced yesterday that the Ford GT program is dead after 2019.
Is the Cobrajet program next to fall? |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
Ford will stop providing support for both Chip Ganassi Racing Team USA and Team UK at the end of this year, ending its official involvement in IMSA and FIA World Endurance Championship. While the factory-backed Ford GT will be no longer, the car may still compete in IMSA and WEC through customer teams. Ford is hoping to sell the remaining Ford GT race car chassis to interested IMSA or WEC teams, it said. The automaker’s goal is to have four cars racing next year – preferably two in IMSA and two in the WEC. “We’ve talked, at some level, just looking to find the best way to keep the cars on track in the future with some level of involvement from us,” Ford Performance’s head of motorsport, Mark Rushbrook told Sportscar365 in an interview. “The cars are meant to be on track. They’re meant to be raced and that’s our preference, in trying to optimize where and how they get raced.” The automaker would provide some level of support for customer Ford GT teams, however, due to the complexity of the vehicle. “With these cars, they are of a higher pedigree that you can’t just sell them to anybody and they can just go race them,” Rushbrook added. “You can’t just push the button and go. There’s a lot of knowledge that needs to go along with it to make sure they’re raced competitively.” |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Ford said from the very start that the GT program would not be a long term factory backed effort. It sounds like they want the team owners to take over running the program with limited factory support. Probably a deal more like what they currently do in NASCAR.
The GT street car program was originally not supposed to last as long as it has either. |
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Quote:
|
Re: 2019 Cobra Jet program in jeopardy ?
Reading Jesse Kershaw's posts is a fascinating inside glimpse of what it takes to develop a package car. I would LOVE to get the same description of what happened inside Mopar. Why DID Geoff Turk leave the brand he raced for decades (at the pinnacle of performance) and jump into a CJ? I bet the story their is even more brutal than what Mr. Kershaw is relaying...
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.