Re: Index Change Rumor
How about this: Leave the indexes the way they are. And have NO AFS for any CLASS elimination or HEADS UP at all. (HOWEVER!). 1.20 under is MANDATORY complete tear down, at that race immediately at the conclusion of class eliminations. If found to be good then add a certain percentage hp to that combo? I this would kinda put all parties involved responsible and accountable.
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
Too many 1.20 under runs lately..Raise the trigger ..then no more goodies for five years. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Hey Barry Parker, I’m one of the younger generation guys racing stock and super stock, I don’t have a 100,000 dollar race car, I run M/SA, about as lower class as you can get in these days, we work very hard in our stuff, and to me 25k is a good chunk of change, I think your outlook on us younger guys is a little jaded, remember when we raced each other at Lebanon valley this year and you beat me which gave you a bye to the final, and you told me you were all done cause you were just testing, I told you that you had a bye to the final, and your response to me was “I don’t need the money” well here’s my opinion on that, that’s what test and tune is for! so if you weren’t planning going more rounds in a gamblers race where some of us could have used that money to either buy more fuel, tires or whatever, could have been a better outcome then just giving up and taking others out of the race.
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Hoo boy, Barry, just when I was starting to agree with you this Stickles kid drops a bomb on ya. Jeez, if you really DID say that to the kid, why didn't you just go all Torrance on him too. You couldn't have made him feel any worse!
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Mr.Stickles, the next time you race Barry, make sure YOU send him packing.
Mike A114 |
Re: Index Change Rumor
agreed, if he knew he would not run any more, why not just go red? some of us actually want to race and win and can use that $...
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Or you could just use the AHFS at Indy like it was intended..
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
Now lets set the record straight on the race you are talking about. It was a Saturday. The ASRA had a run off of the top 16 members that day and a members race on Sunday. And yes I'm a member and planned on racing on Sunday's race. I went on Saturday to do some testing. I heard that they were putting on a gamblers race for those that were not in the top 16. I don't get out to race much so thought I would join to get some practice. I believe we raced in the 3 round. I won. There was no bye the next round was the final. It was getting close to the end of the day and they wanted to hot lap the cars that were left. I had made the decision after that round not to run my car after making several test runs and then going a few rounds. If I remember the difference in money was 75 dollars. In my head I weighted it out and didn't think it was worth it to take a chance on cooking a trany or hurting parts. You said something to me and I said I didn't need the money. We were talking about 75 dollars. Don't know you well so I didn't think I needed to go into why I wasn't going to race the next round. Again I won the round with you so it was my choice. If it was the Sunday ASRA race that would have been different. If the seventy dollars was that important I wish you would have told me before the round. So I'm a littler confused why you are mad at me. Is it that I beat you or that I thought the seventy dollars wasn't worth me taking a chance on hurting any parts. It's just not a cheap class to run no matter what car you have. BP |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Have any of the SRAC reps polled any of the racers in their respective division about this rumored change?
Shouldn't all of the racers have some input, rather than it just being thrust upon us? Has the NHRA informed the reps about possible changes? If so, have the reps had any input? I'm not saying the idea is good or bad, but as racers who must live with any rule changes I would think our input would be valuable. If the reps do know about the change and haven't spoken to many of the racers, is that who we really want to represent us? |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
If it was the Sunday ASRA race that would have been different. If the seventy dollars was that important I wish you would have told me before the round.
Barry, your missing the point, no it wasn’t for $75 dollars actually, is was a few hundred bucks I believe, I can verify with Greg Sutherland since he won, but that’s not the point, if you aren’t concerned with whatever the win money was, because clearly you have that much money, then clearly you could have afforded the test and tune class that was operating that day and not messed up a perfectly good gamblers race because the difference was $25 to enter the gamblers compared to $75 or whatever the test and tune fee was. But yes you beat me, it was your choice to not continue, but for a younger guy like me having fun and enjoying time with my family racing, after your comment took the wind out of my sail and quite frankly the rest of the actual race. Oh and for the record, I appreciate your offer on the free speed secrets, but you can keep them, we are plenty fast. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
The conversion to full Stock from PS for my Impala is $15k. That is to be somewhat competitive, reliable and safe. For me it is also the time and maintenance. I love the S/SS association races. They bring the cost to fun ratio closer in line with local bracket racing. For long distances meets....couple nights at a motel ! Do not have to worry about fuel checks or tear down. In the North East most races are within a few hours to a day of driving. Anything South or West are days of driving. I remember at 75&80 and other tracks S/SS was every week end. It would help if all the XHRA’s would collaborate with each other. Use / Rent each other’s tracks and personnel. Make setting local and National Records exciting. Map where one race does not compete with another. Work with S/SS associations to fill in race dates. Maybe Get them involved with Divisional Points Get a marketing company to advertise S/SS for the public for all tracks. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
For the record I do believe Barry said he is NOT a fan of lowering the indexes, but would like to see NHRA do something about the AFHS.
Barry I think you may be wrong in thinking that no new or young people want to get into stock. My son joined the ranks this year, and I have another one behind him. You are correct stock is not cheap anymore, however lowering the indexes won't help. Stock needs to stay as a entry level class. We need to keep it affordable for new and young people to come join us and Learn. Let's show them what it takes to work on a car and let them want to get faster for the heads up races. If we just keep changing indexes and rules just to suite the faster cars we will have NO future. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
IMHO pure stock was a good class. Pretty much stock eliminator before the valve spring change. With adherence to those rules anybody can afford to race. And the challenge of building a good car within the rules was there for anyone. Hence the term "entry level". Super stock is there for anyone who wants to really push it. Stock today, one way or another, is what the racers asked for which brings us to today's reality of the class. Not exactly my idea of progress.
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Racing of any kind is not and never has been cheap. It is for most of us a secondary part of life. A hobby, a fascination, an addiction, a secondary source of income, a part of the business you are in, etc. Most it is not the primary source of income but something we do with our spare money or whatever.
Race fuel, slicks, engines and transmissions set up for any type of racing, safety equipment, support vehicle and trailer, entry fees, hotels, gas, tolls, and time off work it gets expensive real quick. Racing is a luxury that many can't afford, racing at the National Event level is a privilege. Know this going in and it is much easier to accept. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
I am not for lowering the index's in stock. I think you would lose some racers that are on the lower end of the qualifying sheet.
For us personally It would be a good thing to have the index lowered, but for the class as a whole, not so much. Lowering the index's would only help the minority. Just my 2 cents |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Ha Barry. My post was not meant to be negative towards you. I agree most new racers are second or third generation racers. This may be in part because that was the only way they where exposed to the sport. I dont think NHRA does anything to promote Stock/or super stock. Also i see a lot of negative comments on this forum and in person when someone says they want to get into stock.
I agree the system is broken. Yes it is a performance based category Maybe NHRA should raise the trigger to . 1.15 Under for a review, and 1.25 on automatic hits. Also maybe not post the averages twice a year. Make it more difficult for people to play the game. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Tim just for your info even though it's none of your business I paid for test and tune long before they started the gamblers race. The gamblers race was as you said was 25 dollars to enter. Less than 20 joined how much did you think it was going to pay. At several of the ASRA meets I see cars all the time running test and tune and the ASAR race. Is there a rule against it? I'm not missing your point your missing mine. You my friend have no say in how and when I race my car and I have none in yours!! You act like you are new to Stock but you are second generation and have been at the races for years with your dad. When we ran in the third round if you told me that if I beat you it was going to ruin your weekend and take the wind out of your sails would you have wanted me to take a dive. Would you have felt better knowing that you really didn't win that round. Not me. I'm sorry you were so upset. Instead of complaining to everyone there why didn't you come over and tell me how you felt. I would have told you why I decided not to race in the final. The right I had the choice to make by beating you. As I said I just didn't think it was worth me beating on my car anymore. My choice not yours. Greg won 200 when Marc gave me the money I believe it was 125. I will buy a participation trophy and keep it in my trailer so if we race again and if you loose I will give it to you. Than maybe you will feel better. This sport is a tough one. Your going to need to handle a loss better and understand you can only control how you race not others. Again if it was the main ASRA on Sunday I would have gone up for the final. BP
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
[QUOTE=Jim Whitehead;602689]Ha Barry. My post was not meant to be negative towards you. I agree most new racers are second or third generation racers. This may be in part because that was the only way they where exposed to the sport. I dont think NHRA does anything to promote Stock/or super stock. Also i see a lot of negative comments on this forum and in person when someone says they want to get into stock.
I agree the system is broken. Yes it is a performance based category Maybe NHRA should raise the trigger to . 1.15 Under for a review, and 1.25 on automatic hits. Also maybe not post the averages twice a year. Make it more difficult for people to play the game.[/QUOTE Jim I didn't take it as negative. You hit the nail on the head NHRA has done nothing to show they want the average guy or girl to race Stock. I know Billy said they want new blood in the sport but I would have to question what class they want them in. If they think giving us all the after market parts driving the cost to build a competitive stocker up. Lowering the quota's at National Events to where you have to go to 6 or more grade point races. Having chased off so many paying manufactures. We all could go on. Now if that is their business plan for growing our end of the sport maybe it's time they take another look at it. BP |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
Only use the 2-3 fastest numbers a year from each racer eng/car combo towards the average. That could make the averages a little more accurate. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
Barry, I said my peace, but you can’t seem to let it go, I wasn’t that upset about it, to tell the truth it was more your pompous attitude about it that bothered me more, I wasn’t upset about the 200 dollars, and no I wouldn’t have asked you to take a dive, I don’t operate that way, and I wouldn’t expect you to either, again, it was more how you went about it. I can take a loss just fine, and yes I have been around for a while and I respect my elders, but when something like that happens to you, I’m sure you would have lost a little respect for that person also, just my opinion. Believe me, if I couldn’t afford this game, I wouldn’t be doing it. But I can, and I can have my own opinion on what happened, had I known maybe I would have dialed different and not beat up on my stuff trying to win a round, maybe you could have been upfront and say hey after this pass I’m done. Maybe next time just be upfront to your competition that’s all, and your right it’s none of my business either way! |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Lower all the indexes by 3 tenths, change to a 1 lb weight break to create more heads up runs. Give all carb combos 15hp back, the performance base has to return back or it will stay just mostly a bracket race.
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
It shows that people are think and contributing in the arena of ideas. Top four runs per half year.Throw out the fastest . Average the three remaining. Over .95 under, horsepower added. No lowering the average for hp off. Write a letter , comparing and using examples to make your case. Glendora tech has to get off their a**es and make a judgement. It's not that hard , for anyone who's been around this for a while. I know that a few of us would do it for them..half price! |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
All of this has come about from the guys that have been protecting their combo for years don't want to get hit by the AHFS. They want to be able to run all out and not get hit with HP. This is just a ploy by the fast guys to get their way and not pay. None of this is going to help the class get more participation or new blood. It wont help get more heads up races. Most likely it will backfire like everything NHRA has done recently with regard to our classes. Take a look at Comp Eliminator. That class is almost non existent due to similar things that the fast guys want to do to stock and super stock. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.