Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Thanks for the Covid Quarantine entertainment. Continue, as I have a giant bowl of popcorn to inhale!
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
When you are not aware or don't know the facts, why even discuss it? It becomes gossip. Add your previous statement that NHRA rescinded the rule because some people "cried"? Your posting gives many the impression that John builds illegal engines when the fact is his engines have undergone many teardowns throughout the years and set many records and always deemed legal. Let's not forget there are others that have been doing the same work on their cylinder heads with other makes and they are considered legal. Is there a bias? By the way, I do not have any involvement in the lawsuit. |
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
A couple posters in this thread seem ridiculously sensitive to this post.
As a completely outside observer but one who follows most topics on the board pretty closely, I don't think anything actually posted by the OP is anything close to out of line. Nobody is saying (that I see) the racers that had Gulius stuff or used similar mods are or were cheaters. The stuff was made illegal via rule change, there was a huge uproar, and NHRA reversed the rule change. If I had stuff that checked legal and was made illegal with a stroke of the pen, I'd complain or cry too. The OP said the same. That doesn't infer anything negative about the complainers, IMO. Now there is a lawsuit that is likely related, and a post was made here. I don't think one needs to know every facet of a topic to make a post about it. |
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
I didn't say I didn't say it, I said I didn't say I said it...
pS |
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
The tech dept has no doubt found many illegal items only to be overridden by the powers that be. Why? More than likely to avoid lawsuits by the competitor towards his engine builder. When push came to shove, the engine builder did not talk to the techman who found the illegal item. The engine builder went straight to the top and confronted the powers that be saying the illegal part had passed tech many times before. Of course those many times before may not have been in tear down but in tech at a points meet probably by a guy who normally teched S/G. Now that some real rules with some teeth in it have been proposed they start rubbing the engine builders the wrong way and all #### breaks loose.
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads.
It would be interesting to know what Mr Gulius motivation to bring a law suit against NHRA. Money, respect. I know he closed his business down supposedly because of this head issue. He is 75 years old. His stuff was always very fast but sometimes didn’t pass tear down. I know of some that got their privilege suspended that were his customers.
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
Too many "John Wayne" wannabes floating around! Sad, very sad! |
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
?????
|
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
It baffles me how this thread keeps going with very little and/or no knowledge about the facts. As I have pointed out previously, to other posters on here, please refrain from making statements you are not educated on. If you would like the facts, although I doubt any of the parties involved will tell you, go get them from the source. If not, your speculative BS is exactly that...BS, and you know who you are! Never heard so many people love the sound of their own voice...keyboard! |
Re: Lawsuit over cylinder heads
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.