Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
The whole problem with this combo is as Glenn stated it doesn’t exist.
So now Glen has a license to go out the number one qualifier anywhere And when class happens go as fast he wants with no penalty. Also now his car is legal FG H stock auto car moves into an 11 1/2 pound break. The aluminum head is only on the Corvette. When NHRA allowed aftermarket aluminum heads there was a 10 hp penalty But he gets to run for one year with this combo. NHRA is allowing a superstock GT combo to run stock eliminator for one year WTF Frank let’s be real Glen didn’t do the aluminum head because it was worse. He just took 40 pounds off the nose of of his car and another 40 pounds of ballast so how is that fair. It’s a superstock GT combo running stock eliminator This needs to be fixed. 10 HP. For aftermarket heads. And it still isn’t Fair. Glen started a thread where are all the class races …..I wonder why lol Tell me I’m wrong |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
[QUOTE=James Perrone;655662.
The aluminum head is only on the Corvette. When NHRA allowed aftermarket aluminum heads there was a 10 hp penalty But he gets to run for one year with this combo. Frank let’s be real Glen didn’t do the aluminum head because it was worse. He just took 40 pounds off the nose of of his car and another 40 pounds of ballast so how is that fair. It’s a superstock GT combo running stock eliminator This needs to be fixed. 10 HP. For aftermarket heads. And it still isn’t Fair. Glen started a thread where are all the class races …..I wonder why lol Tell me I’m wrong[/QUOTE] Jim This combo has been legal for for over 20 years. Glenn had it reviewed now it's gone next season. You think he's not taking it in the tookis? What I stated about my research and advice from very good people is truth, he decided to spend the time & money. You got a problem protest him and meet in the barn take your stuff apart too. This head is no where near as good as the 113, it and the 128 are factory heads not aftermarket don't know where bringing up aftermarket heads comes into this. The iron 083 head originated as a corvette head got a problem with it too? Is the 1LE option package no good? Come on man! Let's talk reality the car was probably the fastest in the country before he bought it. It had the same combination I run and had very good hands in it. When I was the fasted flat top in the country on paper it was probably faster just didn't show it. The truth of the matter is if a couple of guys understood the AHFS and bothered to pay attention the flat top would still be very good the iron dish motor would be better than the aluminum head. If the car was built right the weight off the front due to the aluminum heads is really not that big a deal. This talk of weight off the front is really not an issue if you know how to build a car. Stand by by statement about second under and ladder choices. I was there when you were track champion several years the best I ever did was top 10. Just beat the guy in the final like you know how to do. This stuff is just BS when winning is the goal. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
It’s a corvette motor it the only way to get that motor in 1989 So it’s not legal.. if you couldn’t buy it from the dealer it’s truly BOGUS By the way it’s SOFT as F. Where did Nhra get aHP rating from. ? So Nhra is gonna have to explain why it’s ok for this year. It shouldn’t be a secret... Let’s see him win class at Indy By the way I Always carry Plenty of $$$ money. It’s a super stock combo if it’s in a camaro. FACTS |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
More info on the 73 GTO raced by Mick Leiferman. His brother Dennis, who was a tech at the Pontiac dealership in Madision SD, along with his cousin, Tom Geppert, bought a new 73 455SD Formula Firebird 4 speed and raced it in D/S for several years at Thunder Valley Dragways in SD. They pulled the engine and bought a 73 GTO, installed the engine and an automatic trans and continued to race it in the midwest. Dennis told me that Pontiac never built a SD GTO but NHRA had it in the book so they were going to do it. After two or three years, they sent the car to Mick who raced it for several years before pulling the engine, changing the cam and installing the engine into a light weight Firebird and running S/G. Dennis sold the original Firebird Formula SD in1978 and found it again around 2005 and proceded to restore it. Dennis passed away a few years back but his wife has kept the car at the family farm in Kimball SD.
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Maybe a side bet? We'll see who starts getting death threats first! |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Jim way back when I met Jerry Stein we became friends after a couple years Jim Morgan was buying the Husky Car so he offered me the ride in the Tomata Can. One of the first things he told me "STOCK IS NOT STOCK" and this is gentleman's racing. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Many of us remember the successful blitz that you leveled against Jeff Lee's bogus combination. I applaud your efforts in that situation but there is another more egregious combination right in your neighborhood. That being the Carp/Hoven Hemi. This car is also worthy of your corrective attention. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
I had no way of knowing that. Love to be able to present facts, rather than wondering or assuming. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
The AMC's were allowed to run a replacement, over the counter, intake and carburetor and had been approved by IHRA and later NHRA. The AMC intake and Holley carburetor were part of the AMC factory parts catalog with its own section. At the time, the basis for the allowance was the same premise as the 1971 Boss 351 using a Holley carburetor in lieu of the Motorcraft carburetor. With the Boss 351, due to the overlap of the solid lifter camshaft, the dealer's service departments were having issues addressing driveability and idle issues with the Motorcraft carburetor. Therefore, the factory released a service bulletin with instructions to replace them with a new Holley carburetor that Ford released to address the issue. The AMC deal is similar to what took place as to the use of the Mopar Edelbrock LD intake manifold on SBM's that also had a factory part number that was also rescinded. Instead of being a keyboard warrior and throwing Billy into the fray, since you appear to have a lot of knowledge, why don't you take the initiative yourself and address the Carp/Hoven Hemi with NHRA? By the way, Todd Hoven is one of the many, hard working racers out there, easy to talk too, and you may even be interested in addressing the issue directly with him face to face. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Care to elaborate?
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Secondly, Mr. Nees freely showed documents that proved the Lee car to be bogus and, indeed, some of the documents that had been submitted by Mr. Lee to NHRA were supposedly less than Kosher. Thirdly, Todd is a nice guy but that doesn't stop him from driving a car that was never manufactured by Chrysler. Mr. Nees has also expressed his reservations, on this forum, about the Carp/Hoven car. So in the end I'm only discussing information that has already been presented here. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Would you please provide me with a link to my "expressed reservations"? |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man conversation over. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
The documents Billy provided were the same ones other Chrysler provided IHRA and then provided by Chrysler to NHRA. They were part of AMC's OEM parts catalog Group 19. They were dealer, over the counter, dealer installed parts and AMC has not been the only brand that has done so. However, you can continue with your fetish with the word "Bogus". http://www.planethoustonamx.com/main/group-19.htm |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
I guess I will clarify. Classracer‘s version of CNN is reporting false information.
I run the crossram combination which is the A990 superstock version of the car. Which accepted by NHRA and was absolutely built. He thinks I am running the single four barrel. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
This is much better than the football game.
Philadelphia Eagles 0 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 24 Please proceed with this joust. It's far more entertaining for sure. Also due to be a route like the game. 31-0 All Philadelphia teams suck. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Hey, who ever you are Or what ever a "gumple' is... The Prove Your Car here or We" can petition NHRA really gets under my skin. I didn't approve of appointing you the master speaker for me or for my representation in this forum. You do not speak for me so your "We" in that statement should be changed to "I". So who ever you are and this Gumple BS your hiding behind, Please leave me out of "We"... If you have a problem with a combination GTFO here and talk to the powers that be at NHRA. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Adger, "Let it Be" and let him "Ramble On" as of two of everyone's favorite bands sang.
Without a offensive line you have nothing. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Buda bing just like that.
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Dallas Cowboys are out. There goes the NFC East.
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Oh yea, There goes Gumple down the drain.
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
As I stated earlier, do your research before making accusations and trying to appear as a saviour and hero to all racers. You have failed miserably. Also, I strongly believe you owe Mr. Jeff Lee and apology due to the fact he never submitted bogus documents to NHRA. To put a car in the classification, it requires verification directly from the OEM. Below is a picture of the letter Mr. Dale Aldo submitted to NHRA requesting the approval of the AMC parts, the same way as many other components have been introduced by letter requests through the OEM. By the way, you have gone silent. Are you back in your closet or still in your basement being a keyboard warrior? |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Todd offered a clarification above and I will take this opportunity to do the same. The A990 car was certainly built and classified by NHRA as a Super Stock only car. It was NEVER built as a Stock Eliminator car. It is a car with a great heritage but it has no business running in Stock. The fact that this car was accepted in Stock by some inept NHRA employees does not make it right. It is a Super Stock car masqurading as a Stocker. Finally, my old Gumple heritage is very conservative but we are not greedy nor do we espouse fake news. We may not be dead on the mark every time but we attempt to be honest. Anybody who cries fake news when challenged is a suspect for gaslighting. As mentioned above (and,after having made my thoughts known) I will not be returning to this thread but there other issues that I will post about in the future. Now, to find a couple Tylenols and go to work, yeah it's a holiday. Go 49ers!!!! |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
Welcome to the 21ST Century! And OBTW, "the fact that this car was accepted in Stock by some inept NHRA employees" might not make it right but it does make it legal. |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
The NHRA put a few combos in stock that were SS only. The Hemi race cars, Ford Thunderbolts, ZL1 Camaros. Might be a few more that I don’t know of as well.
Next time you accuse someone of running a combo that is bogus,then tell him he is stealing round wins from other competitors, and threaten to file petitions about it, at least do some research on the driver car combo. You had pretty strong words about my car owner/good friend and myself that proved to be Inaccurate and slanderous. Maybe a retraction is in order? But the fact that you don’t use a real name and remain anonymous so I doubt that will be the case. In fact after that little tirade about us I would say that your credibility is completely shot Not that you ever had any anyway. As the famous Ed O’Brien used to say have a nice day. Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
https://youtu.be/xsis4EQeDCE |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Thanks NHRA. That was a drag race! Two stick beasts…wow
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Well Ken? Think it is time to ask for a signature? That would curb this nonsense.
Todd, you must have spanked up on him pretty bad for this abuse! LMAOI!! Like my buddy Eric says; Shut up and stage! |
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Quote:
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
I'd like to leave it as it is. It keeps life interesting. If it gets out of control, Ken can suspend or ban the poster.
|
Re: Pontiac 455 hp reduction
Mr. Gumple?,
You seem like an intelligent man and modestly knowledgeable about Class Racing. This is a tough group to share your controversial opinions with especially since you're new to the forum, hardly an expert and most importantly the active racers here have no idea who you are. Tell us about yourself and be welcomed to post your ideas. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.