Re: Russ linke
Quote:
I'm not being nonchalant about it. Seems like a strange place to cheat since it's so easily checked. I don't see it. He had the wrong gasket, and in my view it's not worth all the brouhaha. Would seem to me that the block and heads got machined when the motor got freshened and nobody checked the cc's. I could be wrong, and that's fine, but again it seems a strange way to cheat if that was objective. |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
People up here throwing rocks meanwhile running around with ten thousand dollar cylinder heads with their chest blowed up because their at the top of the sheet lmao
|
Re: Russ linke
Jack are you sure they were to thick. If they were too thick no problem.
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Opps - my bad ---too thin |
Re: Russ linke
Does this man also enter races as Bubba Linke? Same number 1150 in stock.
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't accuse anyone of breaking the rules. NHRA did.. All I said was there was and is a vested interest in how fast that car goes, in a really popular class lately. I know what I see, and that car was fast last year and it was fast the other day too. You guys can think whatever you want. BTW , I've heard reports of .014 and up to .023 on the gasket. Nobody said anything about head cc's to me. |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
First of all this is not a personal attack on Russ. The fact is everyone seems to be happy NHRA pulled a couple cars into the barn, then they find some critical dimensions out of spec. And now most are saying Russ and Georgie are good old boys etc, honest mistake, have a nice day. I show up with an 850 cfm carb in place of a spec 750, will I get a vacation or will I be praised? I am not bashing Russ or Georgie, I am stating the cars weren’t legal. I know in the past what NHRA did when that happened. All I want to see is what will they do here. More or less set the precedent for the future.
And for those saying no big deal, what is a big deal? Titanium valves, dominator carburetor, nitrous system? Tell me how far I can go before I need to plan a 6 month trip to Hawaii? |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Who knows what the punishment is these days but I believe a precedent was set last year on another incident when it was corrected and the racer was allowed to continue racing who I consider another friend. This sport is expensive enough without people sitting around wishing another competitor to be fined or suspended and that's what appears to be happening here. |
Re: Russ linke
Tuesday is usually the day the penalty’s are listed on the NHRA site.
|
Re: Russ linke
I went to the barn years ago at that race ,was found to be .001 big on bore. next race had to come with motor apart for inspection, every checks good you are good to go. penalty will depend on if they feel it was a simple mistake or flagrant one . john kuzenberger 1872 s/s 1873 stk. p.s i know the linkes for 30 years and do not believe this was intentional
|
Re: Russ linke
I would Bet also if you Pull any random car from Competition, They will find something illegal .
|
Re: Russ linke
I've had a few messages over the last couple days basically asking "so you think this ok and we shouldn't be suspending or fining people?" Well yes and no lol
I don't think it's ok but do we want to do financial harm to someone when there is so little for us in return? I mean let's face it we're not running for squat and class means nothing financially. But it is a class Wally and this time the right person/car ended up with it in the end. My personal opinion says he already lost $330 entry fee so how much more would you want to see? |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
On the other hand I spent that much ( or more ) and didn't get a wally . One last thing - there were three other racers in tear down and not much said about them.Hmmmmm.............. |
Re: Russ linke
Jack it’s a Chevrolet world
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Who is Russ linke”s engine builder?
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
This thread has totally gone off topic
|
Re: Russ linke
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Those who were wanting to see more, so sorry. The precedent is now set. Happy heads up! |
Re: Russ linke
Nowadays you can have the piston at any deck height, as long as you make the min.spec.listed in the NHRA blueprint spec.for that engine.Before you had to have the factory deck which was posted then run a gasket to get the posted min.My motor has a .008 neg.deck,total deck is .030 in the specs.the min.gasket thickness would be .022 to get to .030.Now I can put the piston at zero deck but have to have a min.030 gasket to get to the .030 min.spec.You have to use the gasket thickness to get to the listed min.spec. ...gsa612
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Th e 78 400 Pontiac is +.004 with .043 gasket. The PT Felpro was .048 out of the package.It would compress to around .043. You had to run a + deck back then so we had to shoot for something on the + side, like .001 or .002 to be safe. Wesley never did like that rule, and eventually it was changed to what we have today. The LT1 is .015 down , with a .047 gasket. That means, if you had at a - .013 piston , hypothetically speaking, of course, you'd need a .049 - .050 compressed gasket. The Felpro gasket spec is .047 to .053, so a word to the wise there. Cometics are pretty much as ordered, but not cheap. As much as they cost though, you wouldn't want to toss them around, willy nilly. You'd probably have a good handle on this. There..I should be a politician with this one ;-) |
Re: Russ linke
I say we Tar and Feather him!! Isn’t that what we used to do “back in the day”…..asking for a friend.
Tim Stickles |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
Go ahead and start another thread... |
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Not going to waist my breath.
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
|
Re: Russ linke
Quote:
While I can agree that the car owner, or maybe even the driver, should know what's in their motor, how many actually do.. many of the top competitors are using supposed professional engine builders these days.. most of these builders love to claim they put together the best engines, and make the most power.. it's unfortunate in this case, as I believe that the owner/driver probably had no clue, and absolutely no bad intent.. HOWEVER, I have to give a hat tip to NHRA Tech for finding an infraction that ranged in thickness not easily detected by the human eye.. and at that point, a rule is a rule.. Had it happen to me some years back in Comp, when the engine builder said the motor was 305 cubic inch, but then pumped at 307 cubic inch.. shame on me??.. or shame on the builder??.. we pay them good money, do we have to stand over them and double check their every move too??.. could be the question of the day.. |
Re: Russ linke
Who is the engine builder?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.