Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Page XIX of the 2025 NHRA Rulebook
"How to Use This Rulebook" "On the other hand, as to performance equipment, it is the general rule that unless optional performance equipment or performance-related modification is specifically permitted by this Rulebook, it is prohibited. All model, engine, or equipment changes or modifications not specifically addressed in this Rulebook must be submitted in writing to NHRA for consideration prior to competition. Approval will be granted or denied in NHRA?s sole and absolute discretion. The applicant will be notified of approval or rejection in writing from NHRA headquarters." Being that the beam splitter has a definitive purpose, and is not specified as legal in the Stock Eliminator rules, I would deem it illegal. |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 72487 Attachment 72488 Attachment 72489 Attachment 72490over)...bracket, blade, bolts, nuts, and a safety tether for the blade. Then 2 pics of it in use at a bracket race in November 2024. During full throttle attitude and with car at rest in the Winners Circle Photo same day. And use at bracket race Battle of the Brands March 2025. And 1 without it from Oct. 2023 and the actual 6 points I can use to break the 6" high beam at 1,320' depending on last move before the beam. Actually 6 points from front bumper point to tires (bumper, upper spoiler, lower spoiler, lower air dam, tires). Hard brakes to full throttle and all done with 2 feet. With it on only 2 points...bumper on brakes or the beam breaker. Attached not to the body in any manner (as I witnessed of many other body alterations to serve the same exact purpose in both S/SS before taking the step of adding the allowed device. But added by adding 2 1/2 in bolts to the frame member holding the front bumper assembly, equal with the front of the lower front spoiler, at least 2" behind the front bumper, and 10" in front of the lower rearward air dam mfg. attached with 2 bolts and easily removed in 5 mins. The 6 points marked in the 1st photo (class win, without beam breaker), are feet apart from bumper to tires. At this point I would rather leave us all guessing at which point I have total control of using to break the 1,320' beam 6" off the ground with. I only have control of the removal or use of mine, others using other forms and fashions (there are many), must be holding their breath right now. They are out there, and not just a few. People only saw mine because I did not customize or alter the actual body to achieve the same goal. below the radiator support. I used those particular pics as to show the attitude of the car at rest and at full throttle operation. The last move *without it present and attached* determins which point of the car triggers the 6" high beam break point...hard brakes (but not smoking tires), and out of throttle the bumper breaks the beam, Out of throttle light to no brakes, the spoiler breaks the beam, out of it late the lower air dam breaks the beams, dead in it, the tire breaks the beams. Without it on, the track can be 4 different lengths...all my choices. With it on, hard brakes and out of it bumper only. And all other choices 2" back the beam breaker ended all timing. I have not touched the brake pedal but once since I put it on. Ask any of my competitors as many of them know I have broken out against a lot of them (both by tiny amounts and large amounts as wind affects the slower cars by a lot more than faster cars as we are just flat out in the wind longer, far too many and this deep dive has educated me I am far and away better off without the aid of the Still determined by NHRA and their rulebook "beam breaker" as described in G.R. 4.5. |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
2 Attachment(s)
Attachment 72493
Attachment 72494 Without it in Oct. 2023 the 6 points marked w/ yellow numbers 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5's. It can actually go faster on the brakes if chosen very late in the run. And with it recently in March (bracket race). |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
I had a beam breaker on my 01 Corvette in no box bracket racing. If I knew or thought it was legal in Stock, it would've been on my 69 Camaro back then in 2001. The way I understood the rule is
that it was not allowed in Stock. I guess I'll be putting one on if NHRA gives it's blessing. This will be one more reason Stock isn't Stock anylonger! Casey Miles 248H Stock |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Most cars that run an air dam from the factory can take stripe with the nose by hitting the brakes or lifting. Going up against it is a disadvantage and having a car that has it is a disadvantage. When you dont know what takes stripe on your/ opponents car it makes it hard to judge the finish line accurately.
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
SOOOO i am going to suggest 2 new classes/ elims.
A. Competition Stock and Superstock. first to break the beams. But if you go more than 1.3 under then you get penalized like Comp. NOBODY gets a trophy " Walter". Only money or gift card. B. Vintage Stock/Superstock Run off of records after new records are set. 1970 Rulebook - Carbs only. Records verified by teardown by an elected team of 3 current racers in ea.Elim. Rotated periodically, and overseen by NHRA tech officials. Trophys that mean something and contingency $$ Damn i just woke up . I must have been Dreaming |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
So, based on the ruling in Vegas, this is legal, right? I whipped this up in about a half hour here at the shop. I?ll run this by tech at Carolina Dragway at the double D2 National opens this weekend and we?ll all find out for sure.
https://i.postimg.cc/x1XTfrrN/IMG_7170.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/C1QcVfbq/IMG_7173.jpg |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
This has been a most interesting thread. |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Leave it on if it passes tech. Replace rivets with bolts and slot it. Dump hard at the stripe and it will adjust itself!
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
What will it do to the track under hard braking?
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stocck
Could get interesting loading and unloading car from the trailer …..
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
We don't get the spectator draw we want at most races. If we all have
these extenders in a similar as the one show here, and maybe some fabricated from steel, in the evening and late night races we might be able to put on a hell of a spark show. I don't want want to be one that hits the brakes and my extender starts digging into the track and finds an old pipe or cable and has an rapid de-acceleration. J.R. P.S. I can think of 10 safety reasons NOBODY should have these things!! |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Maybe we could put some flashing lights on it(LED of course,so we don't drain the battery). Change the name too. Call it a Lion Tamer.
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
"the installation of a ?beam breaker? in front of the body is restricted to extending no farther forward than the body or bumper" 1700/STY/781L :) |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
We had one on our bracket Camaro & need to put it on the new front-end. It was there for a couple reasons & maybe more.
The way I had the car set-up I had the option of tripping the finish line with the beam breaker or the front tires. I need to get another one made for the car. This time I will have it electronically controlled to stow it away for loading or other options. As you can somewhat see both cars were equipped with one in the pic. 1700/STY/781L :) https://i.imgur.com/sh8Mqkv.jpeg |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
His car in the photo is way out in front of your tires. And he already broke the stripe beam. Ty for confirming the photo view. |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
I did not in any way customize the body in any manner (others have though to achieve the same purpose my investigation revealed), and I am getting famous for all the wrong reasons. As the recently deemed legal ruling showed. Mine is coming off in 5 mins today. Will go back on maybe for brackets (mainly 1/8th mile as it allows for a full throttle consistency of beam break), maybe in Stock if the rule is not changed. Who knows...but it just may trigger a few to look around at some other front ends in the classes....some are going to be as shocked as I was. It helped me a lot less than the theory (or math), behind it, it is really not a performance advantage. The faster mph cars will see more than the lower mph cars. Competition adjusted to it as it was right out there to see and adjust to. As expected it was deemed legal, but in the end controversial and it gave the competition something to look at while they missed all the variations I saw in use before I attached it. I would much rather race against Mr. Pauley's version any day as I would see that straight edge coming up beside me and know where his front end will break the beam. It would certainly take out all the guesswork of where I needed to be come the line...or not to be any longer, once that straight edge reached it if in front of me. Getting you to look (and question the rule), may have just been half the reasoning of using the not so much of an aid in reality. Now back to guessing which part of my car will break the beam first (all of us). Points 1, 1.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. (Bumper point, bumper slope rearward below the point, lower part of lower spoiler, upper part of sloped lower spoiler, lower further back air dam, or tires?) Spanning 29". (All 6 points can be set into that beam break zone based on last move at the line). With it on there was only 2 points bumper and beam breaker 4" apart. Bumper and Body are 2 different rule sections. As is Ground Clearance. My bet is there is a silent majority praying the rule stays, and a minority whose eyes are now opened. I was not shocked it was deemed legal, just that others did not question it sooner. Or approach me and ask why. At least now I know why during a top end ( fluids warm up), I was asked to stop & roll up my driver's side window for a second right across from the tech trailer. He calmly said ok I looked, you can go now. He no doubt has seen for years all variations of what I have seen. They can be ugly for sure. They can also be effective. But they are not a performance advantage. I can go quicker on the brakes with or without it. A deep dive into the numbers showed me it actually gave my competitors an advantage. The same one Mr. Puley's would give me. A target to guage off of. Grabbing my jack now. It may reappear, it may not...we shall see. My educated guess is (from the deep dive the controversy forced), fewer breakouts after better lights. I could certainly use more win lights and less controversy. Couldn't we all? The slow guy is not going away, And he is not changing because he was deemed legal either under the current rule set, just changing his strategy because the deep dive says there may be a better way to turn on more win lights. Again, we shall see. Don't hate the player...hate the game. Actually I love this game. And I would not trade it for anything in the world at my advanced age. Dang...you would think it was a heavy flywheel pulled out from under the driver's seat after a pass. I saw that done in the mid 80's by a Stock racer at O.C..I.R. while standing on a return road while talking to a tech guy (long before I ever entered Stock as a category), and he saw it also and said excuse me, duty calls...now that was blatant cheating, and the guy was caught in the act and immediately punished. It has been a bit of work anyway to keep it in the starting line approach area after my dry hop, up in the 3" clearance area which means "do not hit the brakes" and make the nose dip at all upon approach to the pre-stage beam or you get that pre-flash of the pre-stage beam, which will have someone waiting for you, or seeking you out later for "the talk" and warning. The fun part was when it happened once to both a competitor and I at almost the same exact time (the double wink of pre-stage beams), and we had both hit the brakes at same point in a bracket race staging up, causing both front ends to dip (both upper blue rainbows blinked almost simultaneously), and the starter let us both continue to stage up tire to tire (but I saw the look at both of us), and neithe r 1 if us were warned when returning. One fewer thing to distract or worry about, means more time to get the actual job done again. Getting better R.T.'s and win stripes by lesser marginal fractions. |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stocck
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
What in the hell is Stock Eliminator turning into?
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
I would ask for clarification on this subject at tech. Cgl/Gary's beam breaker isn't mounted to the body/bumper. 1700/STY/781L :) |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
1700/STY/781L :) |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
No, they never were legal
It took someone trying to get an advantage in reading the general regulations It?s called a crutch?. Like that deep staging stuff a crutch |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Well...
After pondering on this a bit... I feel even though the pecker extender is not in the spirit of Stock/SuperStock... I think I'm less offended by the pecker extender than the automated shifters... Personally, I don't think either should be legal in Stock/SuperStock... Or Comp... |
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Quote:
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
Still legal in Factory Stock Showdown? How many even noticed them in the recent event pics posted from the other eastern 4 lane dragstrip?
|
Re: And you thought air/ electrical shifters in stockers was
I believe the A in the class designation stands for Automatic. It does not say how the automatic shift is initiated. Internal, air, electronic, cable, push button, etc.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.