Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Kinda fell into a buzz saw, right Chuck?
As to weight adjustment prior to scales, let me give you a scenerio. You have a B/SA and run another B/SA in eliminations. They beat you by .01 (ignore reaction times) and, just before the scales, someone hands them a 25 lb. bar which they put under the seat. They are OK by 5 lbs. Is that legal? Of course not. Adjusting weight after a run for any reason is not in keeping with the spirit of the rules. That being said, I've got a lot of respect for the Sorensons, and I understand why they did it. The AHFS makes little sense. It would take little effort to write a computer program that converts ET to match actual DA at the time of the run rather than to an arbitrary factor. We do it all the time with our weather stations. |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
Good to hear from you. Noticed you put the cuda in "A" . I remember when Darin and I did that and the dam thing went a 10.12 at Pomona. I didn't think it would go that fast. The toughest thing I ever did was sell that car. So far I have survived Prostate Cancer, a stroke, and now a 90% blocked artery. I am glad to still be here. Love to read your reports on the races. Unfortunately Hal did what he did and the information is from 2 very reliable sources. Read the qualifying sheet and you will be able to figure out who the sources are. Say hi to Patsy for me. Dave |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
|
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
You are correct. Gary and I built that car in 1976 after Butch Leal bought our 65 A-990 car. It ran ok but Don Little was the guy who finally figured out how to really make one run. He also was the guy who talked us into running a Six Pack instead of the Hemi. Smartest move we ever made. Dave |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
|
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
I understand and agree with what you are saying. I understand NHRA has been approached in the past to develop and implement a program similar to what you are describing. I haven't anything more about it for a long time. I want to think there is still some sprit left in the interpretation of the rules. However "we" in this sport have deviated so far from the way it was 30+ years ago when I started, that it's hard to define the boundaries of the rules anymore. I still haven't found the rule in the rule book. Chuck RE: Buzz saw - I suppose I did. I guess Dave & I were on a collision course this morning. I hold no grudges. |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Quote:
was testing it to straighten out some things. But I don't think it was 2 or 3 yrs back? |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Because the purpose of weighing a vehicle is to determine "race weight" not "race weight after removing weight".
To determine race weight you would have to fill the radiator back up and of course know how full it was in the first place in order to be accurate. Geez, if you need a written rule on how to interprut that, you must have a sorry program. I only raced Dave's 'Cuda once. Darrin beat me....:rolleyes: |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
. For one thing it doesn't take into consideration exceptional conditions like today in Boise. The conditions were beyond mineshaft.
So Chuck,if one of us East coast guys flys in real good air I guess we can just dump weight to discount the run to avoid a hit? Ed F. |
Re: Sorenson 1.408 under at Boise
Well, did the run count or not?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.