Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

Okay, update my total to 4 double redlights this season. In this case, I saw the other guy's red-light so I raised my launch RPM to take a stab at the $100 perfect light bonus (I missed).

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

We used to have that here at Tulsa. I liked to run cars about .5 slower, and just left when their car moved, the slower car was dead meat, and could do nothing about it. Several guys did that. One was killing us until the starter found he was watching him press the button.

Many faster guys take a shot at the tree when the slower car goes red, or just stop sitting on the converter for no reason. If they change it, I think the guys wanting it will be suprised at how little it actually helps them.

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

Ed wrote, "I think the guys wanting it will be suprised at how little it actually helps them."

Ed,
It's not a matter of "helping" anybody.

It's a matter of giving both cars an equal chance to red light... PERIOD. That's all it does.

I fail to see what's wrong with that scenario, or, why anyone who values sportsmanship and fair play could object to it. NOBODY has an advantage with this system. NOBODY.

That's not true with the system now in place.

This double red light system will work effectively to level the playing field, whether it's a race between an AA/SA car and an A/SA car, a AA/SA car and a W/SA car, or a V/SA car and a W/SA car.

It plays no favorites.

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

A racer's "job" is to look for and gain every advantage. He's not looking to level the playing field, but to gain an advantage.

Now we're talking about taking one advantage away. This rule would help about 50% of the racers and hinder about 50% of the racers. What could be more fair?

However I can understand the 50% that it would hinder bitching about "Just leave things the way they were. We don't need any more changes." It's not to their advantage to make things more fair.

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

i think you'd find it comes into play a lot more on evenly et'ed cars (ie h/sa vs e/sa) much more often than in huge spots...
anyway it would be FAIR ...

jack

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

I most always leave first, and don't really care either way. I think the slower cars are not going to gain what they hope to. How about both go red, both loose?

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

When I bracket race, I almost always leave 2nd (so I'm one of those guys who would be losing an advantage), but I think they should change the rule in the interest of fairness. Yes, it cost me more to build my car to be quicker, but I also get the advantage of better visibility judging the stripe. The slower car does have the advantage of the "clean" tree (no distraction of the other car leaving), so if you take away the red-light advantage it leaves us with one significant advantage each.

Regards,

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

Ed,

You mean the "First or Worst" rule changed to the "Too bad!" rule?

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

Looking back at my log book for '89 I found that most of my redlights, about 60% , were from leaving early to catch a slower car that did NOT redlight. I guess the were "anxious redlights".

I believe this is a non-problem....that's my opinion, shoot me.

JimR

Re: Frequency of double redlights
 

The answer is. Under the present rule. What if 2 cars break out do both lose?